Motorola Moto G32 vs Samsung Galaxy A05s - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 October 18, 2023
Release Year 2022 2023

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 115.02 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.45 "/g
Weight 184 g 194 g
Height 161.8 mm 168 mm
Width 73.8 mm 77.8 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Silver
  • Black
  • Violet
  • Light Green

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 393 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 43.47 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 13
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G32 and the Samsung Galaxy A05s, dissecting their specifications and translating them into real-world implications for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Samsung Galaxy A05sReal-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5168 x 77.8 x 8.8A05s is slightly larger and heavier; G32 might feel more compact in hand.
Weight (g)184194A05s is noticeably heavier, potentially impacting one-handed use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.7A05s offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive media consumption.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution; sharpness should be comparable on both devices. A05s might have slightly less sharp visuals due to the larger panel size.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzPLS LCD, 90HzBoth are LCD panels with a 90Hz refresh rate, providing smooth scrolling and animations. PLS LCD generally boasts better colors and viewing angles than IPS LCD
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680Snapdragon 680Identical chipsets; performance should be similar for everyday tasks and light gaming.
CPUOcta-coreOcta-coreSimilar CPU configurations; multitasking and app loading times should be comparable.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 610Same GPU; gaming performance will be largely identical.
RAM6GB (as reviewed)4GB (as reviewed)The reviewed G32 variant offers more RAM, potentially leading to smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding apps.
Camera
Rear Camera50MP Main + 8MP UW + 2MP Macro50MP Main + 2MP Depth + 2MP MacroThe G32 has a slight edge with an 8MP ultrawide lens versus a 2MP depth sensor on the A05s. Both have dedicated macro lenses, though image quality is often questionable in this price range.
Front Camera16MP13MPG32 boasts a higher resolution front camera, potentially capturing more detailed selfies.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsA05s can record 1080p video at 60fps, resulting in smoother footage.
Battery Life
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhIdentical battery capacities; expected battery life should be similar, though real-world usage will vary.
Charging30W Fast Charging25W Fast ChargingG32 offers slightly faster charging.
Other
OSAndroid 12Android 13A05s ships with a newer Android version out of the box.
SensorsMore comprehensive sensor suiteFewer sensorsG32 includes a gyroscope and compass, absent in the A05s, potentially benefiting certain apps and games.

2. Key Insights

Both phones share the Snapdragon 680, ensuring comparable performance for everyday tasks. However, the G32 we reviewed boasts 6GB of RAM compared to the A05s's 4GB, giving it a potential edge in multitasking.

The G32's camera system seems more versatile with its 8MP ultrawide lens. While both offer 50MP main sensors, megapixels don't tell the whole story; real-world image quality will depend on factors like software processing.

While battery capacities are identical, the G32 supports slightly faster 30W charging. The A05s ships with the more recent Android 13, though Motorola's update track record has improved in recent years. The G32 also has a slight advantage in sensor variety with the inclusion of a gyroscope and compass.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G32: Suitable for users who prioritize a slightly more compact form factor, smoother multitasking (due to the 6GB RAM in our reviewed model), a more versatile camera system with an ultrawide lens, and slightly faster charging.
  • Samsung Galaxy A05s: Ideal for those seeking a larger display for media consumption and who value having the latest Android version out of the box. Its lower price point might also make it more appealing to budget-conscious buyers.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The A05s generally comes at a lower price point.
  2. Is a larger screen crucial? If yes, the A05s is the better choice.
  3. Do you heavily multitask or use demanding apps? The G32's extra RAM might provide a smoother experience.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G32

While the price difference between specific variants can fluctuate, if all other factors are equal, I'd lean towards the Motorola Moto G32. The extra RAM in the 6GB model I reviewed would provide a tangible benefit in day-to-day performance, ensuring smoother multitasking and better handling of demanding applications. The inclusion of an ultrawide lens, while perhaps not a deal-breaker, enhances photographic versatility. The slightly faster charging and more comprehensive sensor suite are added bonuses. While Android 13 on the A05s is attractive, Motorola's update track record has significantly improved recently, lessening the long-term OS advantage. Ultimately, the G32 offers a more well-rounded package for my usage pattern, which prioritizes performance and a slightly more compact form factor. The marginally higher price, if applicable, would be a worthwhile trade-off for these benefits.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.