Motorola Moto G32 vs Nokia G100 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia G100
Nokia G100
Nokia

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 October 1, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 113.73 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.34 "/g
Weight 184 g 195.1 g
Height 161.8 mm 166.6 mm
Width 73.8 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Nordic Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.52 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 80.3 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 269 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 117.62 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 43.97 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 610

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G32 vs. Nokia G100: A Detailed Comparison

Let's dive deep into a comparative analysis of the Motorola Moto G32 and the Nokia G100, dissecting their specifications and uncovering what they truly mean for the everyday user.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Nokia G100Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5166.6 x 76.7 x 8.9G32 is slightly more compact and pocketable.
Weight (g)184195.1G32 feels lighter in hand.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.52Negligible size difference.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2400720 x 1600G32 offers significantly sharper visuals, text, and a more immersive experience.
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzIPS LCDG32's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GSnapdragon 662G32 boasts a newer, more efficient chipset, likely resulting in better performance and battery life.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz & 4x1.8 GHz)G32's CPU has a slight edge in clock speed, potentially offering quicker app loading and multitasking.
RAM4/6/8GB3/4GBG32 offers configurations with more RAM, enabling smoother multitasking and handling of demanding apps.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5013G32's 50MP sensor promises significantly better image quality, especially in low light.
Selfie Camera (MP)168G32 offers a higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have large batteries, but the G32's more efficient processor likely translates to longer real-world usage.
Charging30W Fast Charging15W Fast ChargingG32 charges significantly faster.
Other
NFCYesNoG32 supports contactless payments and data transfer.
OSAndroid 12 (up to 13)Android 12G32 has guaranteed OS updates to Android 13, ensuring longer software support.

2. Key Insights

The Moto G32 clearly outperforms the Nokia G100 in several key areas. Its higher resolution display, faster refresh rate, more powerful and efficient processor, superior camera system, faster-charging capabilities, and inclusion of NFC make it a more compelling device overall. The G32 offers a noticeable upgrade in terms of visual clarity, smoothness, performance, and imaging capabilities. While both phones have large 5000mAh batteries, the G32's processor efficiency suggests it will likely provide longer usage on a single charge.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G32: Suited for users who prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, value a high-quality display for media consumption and gaming, need a capable camera for everyday photography, and require features like NFC for contactless payments. This phone caters to those seeking a well-rounded device without breaking the bank.

  • Nokia G100: Best for users on a tight budget who primarily use their phone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and web browsing. Its large battery is a plus for those who need long-lasting power, but users should be prepared for a less refined overall experience compared to the G32.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  • What is your budget? The Nokia G100 is significantly cheaper, making it a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
  • What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the G100 might suffice. However, for gaming, media consumption, or demanding applications, the G32 is the clear winner.
  • Which features are most important to you? If a sharp display, smooth performance, a good camera, and NFC are priorities, the G32 offers a superior package. If battery life and affordability are paramount, the G100 becomes a stronger contender.

My Choice: I would choose the Motorola Moto G32. While the Nokia G100 offers enticing affordability, the G32's superior display, performance, camera, and feature set make it a much more compelling device for my needs. The significantly improved visual experience, smoother performance powered by the Snapdragon 680, and future-proofed software with the Android 13 update solidify the G32 as the better long-term investment. I appreciate having NFC for convenient mobile payments, and the faster charging ensures minimal downtime. The slight price premium for the G32 is easily justified by the significant uplift in overall user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.