Motorola Moto G32 vs Motorola Razr 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola Razr 50
Motorola

General

Launch Date August 16, 2022 June 25, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 101.5 cm³ 92.54 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.66 "/g
Weight 184 g 188.4 g
Height 161.8 mm 171.3 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 7.3 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Mineral Grey
  • Satin Silver
  • Rose Gold
  • Koala Grey (Steel Wool)
  • Beach Sand (Pumice Stone)
  • Spritz Orange (Arabesque)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.9 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2640
Aspect Ratio 20:9 22:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.4 % 84.9 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 413 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 88.22 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.26 mAh/cm³ 45.39 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300X (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G32 vs. Motorola Razr 50: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G32 and the Motorola Razr 50, two phones occupying different niches within the Motorola ecosystem. We'll go beyond the spec sheet to understand what these numbers really mean for you.

1. Specifications Breakdown

FeatureMotorola Moto G32Motorola Razr 50Real-World Implications
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.8 x 73.8 x 8.5171.3 x 74 x 7.3Razr 50 is taller and slightly narrower when unfolded, significantly more compact when folded. G32 is thinner overall.
Weight (g)184188.4Negligible weight difference in practical use.
FoldableNoYesRazr 50's foldable design offers unparalleled portability, but introduces potential durability concerns and a crease on the main display.
Display
TypeIPS LCD, 90HzFoldable LTPO AMOLED, 120HzRazr 50 boasts superior contrast, vibrant colors, smoother scrolling, and potential for battery savings due to LTPO. G32 is a standard LCD.
Size (inches)6.56.9Razr 50 offers a larger screen area for immersive content consumption when unfolded.
Resolution (px)1080 x 24001080 x 2640Similar pixel density, resulting in sharp visuals on both. Razr 50 slightly taller aspect ratio.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 680 4GDimensity 7300XRazr 50's newer and more powerful processor offers significantly better performance in demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.4 GHz & 4x1.9 GHz)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz & 4x2.0 GHz)Razr 50's faster CPU cores enable quicker app launches, smoother multitasking, and improved responsiveness.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G615 MC2Razr 50's GPU provides a substantial boost in graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications.
RAM6GB12GBRazr 50's doubled RAM allows for seamless multitasking and keeps more apps running in the background without performance slowdown.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPBoth have similar main camera resolution, but image quality will depend on sensor size, processing, and lens quality (not fully specified).
Selfie Camera16MP32MPRazr 50 offers a higher resolution selfie camera for sharper self-portraits.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsRazr 50 can record significantly higher resolution videos.
Battery Life
Capacity (mAh)50004200G32 has a larger battery capacity, suggesting potentially longer battery life. However, Razr 50's LTPO display might offset this difference.
Charging30W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingSimilar charging speeds.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance Powerhouse: The Razr 50, with its Dimensity 7300X chipset and ample RAM, is a clear winner in performance. Expect a smooth, lag-free experience even with demanding tasks. The G32, while sufficient for everyday use, will show its limitations with heavy gaming or multitasking.
  • Display Delight: The Razr 50's foldable AMOLED display offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and a buttery smooth 120Hz refresh rate. The G32's LCD is respectable but lacks the visual punch and responsiveness of the Razr 50.
  • Portability vs. Practicality: The Razr 50's foldable design makes it incredibly pocketable. However, the folding mechanism introduces a crease and potential durability concerns. The G32 is a more traditional slab phone, prioritizing simplicity and robustness.
  • Battery Life Balancing Act: While the G32 boasts a larger battery, the Razr 50's more efficient processor and LTPO display could potentially level the playing field in real-world usage.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G32: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and reliability. Suitable for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming.
  • Moto Razr 50: Perfect for users who value cutting-edge technology, a premium display, and top-tier performance in a compact form factor. Excellent for power users, content creators, and those who want a device that turns heads.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? The G32 is significantly more affordable.
  2. Is top-tier performance a priority? If yes, the Razr 50 is the clear choice.
  3. How important is portability? The Razr 50's foldable design wins here, but consider the trade-offs of a crease and potential durability concerns.

My Choice: The Motorola Razr 50

While the Moto G32 offers excellent value, I would choose the Razr 50. The combination of a stunning foldable AMOLED display, blazing-fast performance, and a compact form factor is incredibly appealing. I'm willing to pay a premium for the latest technology and the unique experience a foldable phone offers. The significant performance upgrade, superior display, and the sheer coolness factor of a folding phone outweigh the price difference and battery capacity concerns for me. I'm confident the Razr 50's overall user experience would be more enjoyable and future-proof.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.