Motorola Moto G30 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 17, 2021 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 113.8 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 200 g 189 g
Height 165.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 75.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black (Dark Pearl)
  • Pastel Sky
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.94 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 610 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Moto G30 vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G30ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mmZTE Blade A75 4G is slightly more compact and thinner, potentially feeling better in the hand for some users.
Weight200g189gZTE Blade A75 4G is lighter by 11g, which can be noticeable during extended use and make it more comfortable for longer usage.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Negligible size difference. Both offer a similar viewing experience.
Resolution720 x 1600720 x 1612Both have similar HD+ resolutions, suitable for standard use and media consumption but not as sharp as higher resolution displays.
PPI269267Similar pixel density, meaning sharpness will be nearly identical to the naked eye.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer similar color reproduction and viewing angles typical of IPS LCD displays.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth have a 90Hz refresh rate which means smoother scrolling and animations compared to standard 60Hz displays.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness is not specified.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)The Unisoc T606 in the ZTE Blade A75 4G appears to offer better performance according to benchmark scores, potentially leading to snappier everyday use and better app performance.
AnTuTu Score170,968240,000ZTE Blade A75 4G has a significantly higher benchmark score indicating better overall performance.
GPUAdreno 610Mali-G57 MP1Different GPUs, with the Mali-G57 MP1 in the ZTE Blade A75 4G generally showing better performance in benchmarks.
Camera
Main Camera64.4MP, f/1.750MP, f/1.8Motorola's higher resolution and wider aperture can result in more detailed photos and better low-light performance, but it also depends on sensor quality.
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.28MPMotorola Moto G30 has higher resolution selfie camera for detailed photos.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2Not presentMotorola Moto G30 includes a wide-angle lens for capturing more in a frame.
Portrait Lens2MP, f/2.4Not presentMotorola Moto G30 includes a dedicated depth sensor for better portrait mode photos.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4Not presentMotorola Moto G30 has a macro lens to capture close-up shots.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps1080p@30fpsBoth record at 1080p, but the Motorola Moto G30 offers 60fps recording for smoother videos, and has slo-mo capabilities. The ZTE does not have slow motion.
Camera FeaturesQuad Camera, Laser AF, RAWDual Camera, Digital Image StabilizationMotorola Moto G30 has more camera features and lens versatility. ZTE has digital stabilization.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery sizes, expecting similar battery life for average usage.
Charging15W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingZTE Blade A75 4G has faster charging, meaning less time plugged in to charge the phone.
Battery TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerLi-Polymer is generally more durable, with a slight safety advantage over Li-Ion.
Software
OSAndroid 11 (upgradeable to 12)Android 13ZTE Blade A75 4G ships with a newer version of Android out of the box.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac802.11 a/b/g/n/acBoth phones support similar Wi-Fi standards. The ZTE also has WiFi Display for screen casting to a display.
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.0 LEBoth have similar Bluetooth connectivity
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoZTE Blade A75 4G supports more satellite systems (Beidou) for better location accuracy.
SIMDual SIMDual SIMBoth support Dual Nano-SIM cards.
Storage & RAM
Internal Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBZTE Blade A75 4G offers more storage options with 128/256GB vs 64/128 GB.
RAM4GB/6GB4GB/8GBZTE Blade A75 4G has a higher RAM option with 8GB vs 4GB/6GB in the G30, which means better performance for multitasking.
Expandable StorageNot supportedNot supportedNeither phone offers expandable storage.
Audio
AudioBasic FeaturesDTS / DTS XZTE Blade A75 4G has enhanced audio features for better audio output experience.
Security
FeaturesRear-mounted fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprint sensors are generally more ergonomic than rear-mounted ones.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownUnknownNo information provided about the screen protection.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, GyroscopeBoth have similar sensor packages for basic phone functions.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G30 Advantages:

  • More Camera Versatility: Offers a dedicated wide-angle, macro, and depth sensor giving more options to the user when shooting photos.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: 64.4MP sensor may result in more detailed photos in ideal conditions.
  • Higher Resolution Front Camera: 13MP selfie camera for more detailed self-portraits.
  • 60 fps video: Allows for smoother video.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly higher benchmark scores, indicating better real-world performance and smoother operation in apps.
  • Faster Charging: 22.5W charging allows faster top ups, which is a convenience in everyday use.
  • More RAM: With an 8GB option, allows better multitasking.
  • More Storage: 256GB internal storage is available as an option, allowing users more space for apps, media and files.
  • Newer Android Version: Comes with Android 13 out of the box, providing the latest features and security updates.
  • Better Audio: Comes with DTS/DTS X for better audio output.
  • More GPS systems Provides better GPS for more accurate location tracking.
  • Side-mounted fingerprint sensor is typically easier to access and more ergonomic compared to the rear-mounted sensor on the Motorola.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Motorola Moto G30: Trades performance and charging speed for more camera versatility, which may appeal to photography enthusiasts on a budget.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Trades the additional camera lenses and modes for performance, faster charging and a better audio experience, which may appeal to people who want a good all-around phone that runs smoothly.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G30 Ideal User:

  • Users who prioritize camera versatility and multiple lens options on a budget.
  • Those who want a budget phone with some good camera features
  • Users who take a lot of photos using different camera modes.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Ideal User:

  • Users who want a smooth experience with good overall performance.
  • Users who want a phone that charges relatively fast.
  • Users who prioritize audio performance
  • Users who want the latest version of Android.
  • Users who store a lot of files, as there is a 256GB variant.

Use Cases:

  • Motorola Moto G30: Great for users who want to experiment with different camera modes, and take various types of photos.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Good for everyday use, browsing, watching videos, and some light gaming, especially for users who value speed and responsiveness.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The ZTE Blade A75 4G offers better performance and more RAM and storage, so it provides a better value for users who prioritize performance over camera options.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is camera versatility to you? If you need wide angle, macro, and depth sensors, the Moto G30 is the better option, while the ZTE offers a single, main camera.
  2. How much do you prioritize overall performance and charging speed? The ZTE Blade A75 4G will provide a faster experience and quicker charging.
  3. How much internal storage do you need? The ZTE offers more options at 256 GB, which is important if you need a lot of space for files, photos and videos.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Photography Enthusiast on a Budget: Choose the Motorola Moto G30 for its versatile camera setup.
  • Everyday User Prioritizing Performance: Choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G for its better performance, fast charging, better audio, and newer Android version.
  • User who stores a lot of files: Choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G for its 256GB storage.

My Choice

I would choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G. While the Motorola Moto G30 offers a more versatile camera system, the performance difference indicated by the AnTuTu benchmark is quite substantial, which means the A75 4G will provide a much smoother user experience. The faster charging is also very important for me, and the slightly better audio is a bonus. While I do enjoy taking photos, I think the increase in performance, faster charging and extra storage would be more beneficial in my daily usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.