1. Specifications Comparison
Design
| Feature | Motorola Moto G30 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | The Moto G30 is taller and thicker, while the A35 is wider. The A35 will likely feel more substantial in the hand due to width, while the G30 will feel bulkier. |
| Weight | 200g | 209g | The A35 is slightly heavier (9g), which might be noticeable during extended use. |
Display
| Feature | Motorola Moto G30 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Size | 6.5" | 6.6" | Minimal difference in screen size, both offer an immersive viewing experience. |
| Resolution | 720 x 1600 | 1080 x 2340 | The A35 has significantly sharper and clearer visuals due to its higher resolution. Text and images will appear less pixelated. |
| PPI | 269 | 390 | The A35 offers much better pixel density, resulting in a noticeably sharper display. Details are more pronounced. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | The A35 offers superior blacks, higher contrast, more vibrant colors, and better power efficiency for dark themes. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 120Hz | The A35 provides smoother animations, making scrolling and gaming feel more fluid. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both phones have identical peak brightness. Note: The value for brightness is 0 nits for both phones, which is unusual and might be a data entry error. The correct value is missing. |
Performance
| Feature | Motorola Moto G30 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) | The A35's chipset is significantly more powerful, providing a faster, smoother experience across all tasks, especially gaming and multitasking. |
| AnTuTu Score | 170,968 | 578,500 | The A35 has a drastically higher score, indicating much better overall performance, including faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming. |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G68 MP5 | The A35's GPU is more powerful, enabling smoother gameplay and better graphics performance. |
Camera
| Feature | Motorola Moto G30 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Standard Camera | 64.4MP, f/1.7, 0.70 µm pixel size | 50MP, f/1.8, 1/1.96" sensor, 0.80 µm pixel size | The G30 has higher resolution, but the A35 has a larger sensor with bigger pixels, which generally results in better low-light performance and image quality. |
| Selfie Camera | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixel size | 13MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixel size | Both have similar selfie camera specs, suggesting comparable performance. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12 µm pixel size | 8MP, f/2.2, pixel size missing | Both have similar wide-angle camera specs, so performance should be similar.Note: Pixel size is missing for Samsung Galaxy A35. |
| Portrait Mode (Depth) | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75 µm pixel size | None | The G30 has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait mode, while the A35 relies on software. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75 µm pixel size | 5MP, f/2.4, 1.12 µm pixel size | The A35’s macro lens offers more detail, resulting in better close-up shots. |
| Video | 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | The A35 supports much higher 4K video recording, along with stabilization which results in more professional-looking videos. |
| DXOMark | Not Tested | Mobile: 104, Photo: 107, Video: 110 | A35's camera performance is rated by DXOMark and shows good overall performance, whereas G30 is not tested, limiting comparable evaluation. |
Battery
| Feature | Motorola Moto G30 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Both have the same battery capacity, offering comparable endurance. |
| Charging | 15W Fast Charging | 25W Fast Charging | The A35 charges faster, reducing downtime for users. |
| Features | Non-removable | Non-removable | Both have non-removable batteries. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Moto G30 Advantages:
- Slightly Lighter: 9 grams lighter may be preferable for users who want a lighter device.
- Dedicated Depth Sensor: Provides a hardware advantage for portrait mode, potentially offering better background blur effects.
- Laser autofocus (LAF): This feature may result in a quicker focus in certain situations.
- Phase Detection autofocus (PDAF): Often results in better performance in fast-moving scenes.
Samsung Galaxy A35 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED screen with higher resolution, pixel density, and refresh rate offers a much better viewing experience with vibrant colors, deeper blacks, and smoother visuals.
- Significantly Better Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset delivers much faster performance for all tasks, including gaming, and overall responsiveness.
- Better Video Quality: The A35 can record 4K video with EIS, while the Moto G30 is limited to 1080p.
- Faster Charging: 25W charging means less time plugged in.
- More Advanced Software: Comes with a newer Android version, with more updates.
- Advanced Connectivity: Supports Wi-Fi 6, and newer Bluetooth version with additional profiles.
- Better Audio: Offers Stereo speakers, Dolby Atmos and Hi-Res audio.
- Better Build Quality: Uses Gorilla Glass Victus for better screen protection.
Trade-offs:
- The A35 is slightly heavier and wider than the G30, which might be a concern for some users.
- The G30 provides a dedicated depth sensor, where A35 relies on software for portrait mode, which may produce slightly inferior results.
- The G30 has Laser Auto Focus which is missing from the A35.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola Moto G30 Ideal User:
- Users on a tight budget who prioritize battery life over performance and display quality.
- Those who prefer a lighter device.
- Users who take a lot of portrait photos and value a dedicated depth sensor.
- Those who want PDAF and LAF in their camera.
- Users who need a basic phone for calls, texts, and occasional web browsing.
Use Cases:
- Basic social media browsing and communication.
- Long periods of use without access to charging.
- Users that would prefer a lighter phone.
- Capturing portrait photos
Samsung Galaxy A35 Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize a high-quality display for media consumption and gaming.
- Those who want a smooth and responsive experience for daily tasks and gaming.
- Users who value better camera quality, especially video capabilities.
- Those who want faster charging and future-proof connectivity features.
- Users who appreciate better audio quality.
Use Cases:
- Gaming, streaming videos, and watching content.
- Multitasking, browsing, and social media use.
- Capturing high-quality video footage.
- Listening to music and watching movies.
- Users who want a more future-proof phone.
- Users who value audio quality and good screen protection.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The Moto G30 is likely cheaper, but the A35 offers significantly better performance and features for a higher price.
- How important is display quality and performance? If you value visual fidelity and smooth performance, the A35 is the clear winner.
- What kind of photos do you take? If portrait photography with depth information is your priority, the G30 is a consideration, but the A35 offers a superior main camera.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User: If your budget is very limited, the Moto G30 will provide a basic smartphone experience, but consider saving for the A35 if possible due to its better overall quality.
- Scenario 2: Media and Gaming Lover: The Samsung Galaxy A35 is the obvious choice, providing a much better display and more processing power for a smoother experience.
- Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast (Basic): While the Moto G30 has its merits, the Samsung Galaxy A35 has superior all-around camera quality, particularly for video, and would be a better all-rounder.
- Scenario 4: Basic Smartphone User: If you only need a phone for calls, texts, and very light browsing, the Moto G30 is sufficient, but the A35 would still provide a better and smoother experience.
My Choice
I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A35. While the Moto G30 is a functional device, the A35 offers significant improvements in almost every aspect that matters to me. The much better display quality (AMOLED, higher resolution, 120Hz), superior performance from the Exynos chipset, better camera system, faster charging, and more modern connectivity features of the A35 make it a far more compelling option. Even though the Moto G30 has a dedicated depth sensor, the A35 offers better all-around camera quality, especially for video, plus it has OIS and EIS, which would make it a better camera system overall. While it is likely more expensive, the overall user experience and value it provides outweigh the extra cost.
