Motorola Moto G30 vs Oppo A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Oppo A55
Oppo A55
Oppo

General

Launch Date March 17, 2021 October 1, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 113.8 cm³ 104.03 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.25 "/g 3.37 "/g
Weight 200 g 193 g
Height 165.2 mm 163.6 mm
Width 75.7 mm 75.7 mm
Thickness 9.1 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Phantom Black (Dark Pearl)
  • Pastel Sky
  • Green
  • Starry Black
  • Rainbow Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.51 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 81.6 % 82.6 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 480 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 550 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 117.98 mAh/in²
Battery Density 43.94 mAh/cm³ 48.06 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Mediatek MT6765G Helio G35 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)
GPU Adreno 610 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0, OTG USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Moto G30 vs. Oppo A55

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G30Oppo A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.2 x 75.7 x 9.1 mm163.6 x 75.7 x 8.4 mmMoto G30 is slightly taller and thicker, which might affect pocketability for some. A55 is more compact and potentially easier to handle.
Weight200g193gA55 is slightly lighter, making it more comfortable for prolonged use. The 7g difference may not be significantly noticeable to all users.
Display
Size6.5"6.51"Negligible difference; both offer a similar viewing experience.
Resolution720x1600720x1600Identical; both offer HD+ clarity which is adequate for typical use, but not as sharp as FHD displays.
PPI269270Virtually the same; both have similar sharpness for text and images.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use standard LCD technology, offering decent colors and viewing angles, but not as vibrant as AMOLED.
Refresh Rate90Hz60HzMoto G30's 90Hz refresh rate results in smoother scrolling and animations, making the user interface feel more responsive. A55 has standard 60hz refresh rate.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth phones have the same peak brightness, which can be insufficient in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 662 (11 nm)Helio G35 (12 nm)Snapdragon 662 is generally more power efficient for everyday tasks. The A55's Helio G35 is an entry-level chip.
AnTuTu Score170,968379,800Oppo A55 scores significantly higher, suggesting superior app performance, multitasking, and gaming capabilities.
GPUAdreno 610PowerVR GE8320Adreno 610 in G30 offers balanced graphics for casual gaming. PowerVR GE8320 in A55 is less capable for demanding games.
Camera
Main Camera64MP, f/1.713MP, f/2.2Moto G30 has significantly higher resolution and a wider aperture, resulting in better image quality, especially in low light.
Selfie Camera13MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.0Moto G30 has higher resolution selfie camera, A55 has wider aperture for better low-light selfies.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2NoneMoto G30 offers an ultrawide lens for versatile photography.
Depth/Macro2MP, f/2.4 / 2MP, f/2.42MP, f/2.4 / 2MP, f/2.4Both phones offer comparable 2MP sensors for macro and portrait shots.
Video1080p@30/60fps, Slow-mo1080p@30fps, Slow-moG30 offers additional 60fps option, A55 has slightly slower frame rate slow-motion footage (120 fps vs 60 fps in Moto G30).
FeaturesQuad cam, PDAF, LAF, RAWTriple cam, PDAF, 4k Video, Digital StabilizationMoto G30 provides more control with RAW and laser autofocus; Oppo A55 offers Digital image stabilization and 4K recording option.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones should offer similar battery life for a full day of moderate use.
Charging15W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingMoto G30 charges faster, reducing downtime.
TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerBattery chemistry difference may have minor implications for longevity.
Software
OSAndroid 11, Max v12Android 11Moto G30 is upgradeable to Android 12, Oppo A55 is not. This means Moto G30 might receive new features and security updates for a longer period.
Connectivity
Wi-FiWi-Fi ac, Dual-BandWi-Fi ac, Dual-Band, Wi-Fi DisplayBoth are very similar but A55 can additionally provide Wi-Fi display capabilities to smart TVs.
Bluetooth5.0, LE, A2DP5.1, LE, A2DP, APT-x, LDAC, SBCA55 has newer Bluetooth 5.1 with more advanced codecs for better audio quality with wireless headphones.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, GalileoA55 offers more satellite systems, potentially for better location accuracy.
SIMDual Nano SIMDual Nano SIMSimilar Dual SIM Support.
Storage
Internal64/128 GB128 GBMoto G30 comes in 64GB and 128GB variants. Oppo A55 comes in 128GB variant.
RAM4/6 GB6/8 GBOppo A55 offers more RAM, leading to better multitasking, especially with the 8GB variant.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone supports microSD card expansion.
Security
FingerprintRear-mountedSide-mountedSide-mounted fingerprint sensors are often more accessible and faster than rear-mounted sensors.
SensorsBiometric, Proximity, MotionBiometric, Proximity, Motion, Gravity, GeomagneticOppo A55 has additional sensors for more accurate motion sensing.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownUnknownBoth phones have similar screen protection technology which is unknown.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G30 Advantages:

  • Smoother Display: 90Hz refresh rate offers a more fluid user experience.
  • Better Main Camera: 64MP main sensor captures more detailed images and has a wider aperture for low-light performance.
  • Additional Camera Features: Includes a wide-angle lens, and offers RAW photo capture, and laser autofocus for faster and more versatile photography.
  • Faster Charging: 15W charging vs. 10W on A55, reducing charging times.
  • Software Updates: Guaranteed upgrade to Android 12, with potential for more software support.

Oppo A55 Advantages:

  • Significantly Better Performance: Higher AnTuTu score indicates better app performance, multitasking, and gaming capabilities.
  • Better Bluetooth: Supports aptX and LDAC codecs, offering superior audio quality on supported wireless headphones.
  • More RAM: 6GB or 8GB RAM options allow for smoother multitasking, especially with the 8GB option.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Often more convenient and faster to access.
  • Additional Sensors: Gravity and geomagnetic sensors add more accurate motion sensing.
  • 4k Video Recording: Offers higher video resolution compared to the 1080p video offered on the G30.

Trade-offs:

  • Moto G30: Better camera system and display with a smoother refresh rate, at the cost of less overall performance and slightly slower charging.
  • Oppo A55: Better performance, Bluetooth audio quality, more RAM, and additional sensors, but with a less versatile camera system, a lower refresh rate display, and slower charging.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G30 Ideal User:

  • Casual Photographers: Users who value a good main camera and a wide-angle lens for everyday photography.
  • Social Media Users: Those who appreciate smoother scrolling and animations on their display.
  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users who prefer a good mix of features at a lower price point.

Use Cases:

  • Taking everyday photos with varied scene options using the ultrawide lens.
  • Browsing social media, and watching videos.
  • Casual mobile gaming that is not demanding on performance.

Oppo A55 Ideal User:

  • Performance-Oriented Users: Those who prioritize smoother app loading, better multitasking, and improved gaming.
  • Audiophiles: Users who prioritize high-quality audio when using wireless headphones.
  • Multitaskers: Users who often switch between multiple apps and need more RAM.

Use Cases:

  • Playing demanding games.
  • Listening to music via wireless headphones.
  • Multitasking between several apps.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. Do you prioritize camera versatility and display smoothness, or overall performance and audio quality?
  2. Are software updates important to you?
  3. How important is it to have the latest Bluetooth audio codecs and how much RAM do you need?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • If you prioritize camera and display smoothness: The Motorola Moto G30 is the better choice due to its better camera system, wide-angle lens, and smoother 90Hz refresh rate display.
  • If you prioritize overall performance and audio quality: The Oppo A55 is the better choice due to its better performing chip, newer Bluetooth and increased RAM options.
  • If your primary usage case involves mobile gaming The Oppo A55 is better due to its superior performance and faster loading time, while the Motorola Moto G30 will perform worse, and not be the ideal gaming device.

My Choice

If I were to choose, I would pick the Oppo A55. While the Motorola Moto G30 has a more appealing camera setup and smoother display, the significant performance boost offered by the Oppo A55 is more important for my usage patterns. I value a device that can handle multitasking efficiently and offers smooth overall performance for daily use. I also tend to use wireless headphones often, and the superior Bluetooth audio codecs provided by the A55 are a big plus. The additional RAM will ensure that the device remains responsive over time. While the camera and display are good on the G30, the performance and audio benefits of the A55 make it the more suitable choice for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.