Motorola Moto G24 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 6, 2024 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.45 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 181 g 193 g
Height 163.5 mm 168.4 mm
Width 74.5 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Ice Green
  • Blueberry
  • Pink Lavender
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 537 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.31 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G24 vs. Xiaomi Redmi A3x: A Holistic Comparative Analysis

As a technology researcher, my analysis transcends a simple spec-by-spec comparison. I aim to provide a holistic understanding of these devices within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureMotorola Moto G24Xiaomi Redmi A3xTechnological ContextCategory
ModelMoto G24Redmi A3xBrand positioning and target market.Ecosystem Integration
Launch Date2024-02-062024-05-24Indicates potential access to newer software features and updates at launch.Ecosystem Integration
Price RangeLowLowDictates target audience and expected feature set.User Ecosystem Alignment
Display Size6.56"6.71"Impacts user experience, media consumption, and one-handed usability. Larger displays are trending.User Experience Indicators
Display TypeIPS LCD, 90Hz, 537 nits (peak)IPS LCD, 90Hz, 500 nitsLCD technology provides cost-effectiveness; 90Hz offers smoother visuals; peak brightness matters in outdoor visibility.Performance Metrics
Resolution720x1612720x1650Affects image sharpness; both offer similar HD+ resolution.Performance Metrics
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Unisoc T603 (22nm)Impacts processing power, efficiency, and gaming capabilities. Helio G85 generally offers better performance.Performance Metrics
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHzCore configuration and clock speed determine processing power. G24's configuration is superior.Performance Metrics
GPUMali-G52 MC2IMG PowerVR GE8322Graphical processing unit; influences gaming and UI smoothness. Mali-G52 MC2 offers better performancePerformance Metrics
RAM8GB4GBImpacts multitasking and overall system responsiveness. 8GB ensures smoother performance.Performance Metrics
Storage128GB128GBSufficient storage for average users.User Experience Indicators
Battery5000mAh5000mAhBattery capacity indicates potential usage time. Both offer similar capacities.Performance Metrics
OSAndroid 14Android 14Latest Android version ensures access to new features and security updates.Ecosystem Integration
NFCYesNoEnables contactless payments and data transfer. G24's inclusion is a significant advantage for many users.User Experience Indicators

2. Strategic Technological Insights

Both devices cater to the budget-conscious consumer, prioritizing essential features over cutting-edge technology. However, the Moto G24 demonstrates a clear performance advantage with its more powerful Helio G85 chipset and higher RAM capacity. The Redmi A3x, while offering a larger display, compromises on processing power.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

Both devices operate within the Android ecosystem, ensuring access to a vast app library and services. However, the Moto G24's inclusion of NFC significantly broadens its usability for contactless transactions, a feature increasingly crucial for modern consumers.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

While both devices satisfy basic user needs, the Moto G24 exhibits greater future-proofing. Its superior processing power will likely handle future software updates and demanding applications more effectively, ensuring a longer lifespan of optimal performance. The absence of NFC in the Redmi A3x limits its long-term utility in an increasingly contactless world.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G24

I would choose the Motorola Moto G24. While the Redmi A3x offers a slightly larger display, the G24's superior performance, driven by the Helio G85 chipset and 8GB of RAM, is crucial for a smooth and responsive user experience. The inclusion of NFC further enhances its practicality for daily use. In a budget segment, prioritizing core performance and essential features like NFC over marginally larger screen size offers greater long-term value and a better overall user experience. The G24's advantages in processing power and NFC represent a more substantial and lasting benefit compared to the A3x's slightly larger display.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.