1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G24 | Samsung Galaxy A35 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm | 161.7 x 78 x 8.2 mm | Moto G24 is slightly taller and thinner, Galaxy A35 slightly wider and thicker. Negligible difference in hand feel for most users. |
| Weight | 181 g | 209 g | Moto G24 is noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use. |
| Build Materials | Not specified | Not specified | Cannot compare build quality and durability without more information. |
| Display | |||
| Display Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz | Galaxy A35 offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and smoother scrolling due to AMOLED technology and higher refresh rate. |
| Size | 6.56" | 6.6" | Negligible size difference. |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 (HD+) | 1080 x 2340 (FHD+) | Galaxy A35 has significantly sharper and more detailed visuals due to higher resolution. |
| Peak Brightness | 537 nits | 1000 nits (HBM) | Galaxy A35 will be much more readable in direct sunlight. Moto G24's lower brightness may be problematic outdoors. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm) | Exynos 1380 (5nm) | Galaxy A35's 5nm Exynos chip offers significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the 12nm Helio G85. Expect smoother multitasking and gaming on the A35. |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.7 GHz A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz A78 & 4x2.0 GHz A55) | Galaxy A35 has a more powerful CPU architecture, leading to faster app loading and smoother performance. |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MP5 | Galaxy A35 has a more powerful GPU, resulting in significantly better gaming performance and graphics rendering. |
| RAM | 8GB | 8GB | Both phones have the same amount of RAM, enabling comparable multitasking capabilities. |
| Storage | 128GB | 128GB/256GB | Galaxy A35 offers a 256GB storage option, providing more space for apps, photos, and videos. |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Camera | Not specified | Not specified | Cannot compare camera quality without detailed sensor specifications. |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps | Galaxy A35 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with 4K resolution and 60fps at 1080p, resulting in smoother and more detailed videos. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh | Similar battery capacity suggests comparable battery life, though actual usage will depend on other factors like display and chipset efficiency. |
| Charging | Not specified | Not specified | Cannot compare charging speeds without more information. |
| Other | |||
| OS | Android 14 | Android 14 (up to 18) | Galaxy A35 will receive longer software updates, ensuring security and new features for a longer period. |
| NFC | Yes | Yes | Both support contactless payments. |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0 | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Galaxy A35 supports USB OTG, allowing connection to peripherals like USB drives and keyboards. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Moto G24 Advantages:
- Lighter: More comfortable for extended use.
- Lower Price: Expected given the lower specifications.
Galaxy A35 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED with higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness.
- Significantly Better Performance: More powerful chipset and GPU for smoother multitasking and gaming.
- Better Video Recording: 4K resolution and 60fps recording.
- Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates for a longer period.
- More Storage Options: Availability of a 256GB variant.
- USB OTG: Expanded connectivity options.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Moto G24: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality (calling, texting, web browsing) and a lightweight design. Ideal for users who are not heavy gamers or multimedia consumers.
Galaxy A35: Users who value a premium display, smooth performance, better camera capabilities, and longer software support. Suitable for gaming, multimedia consumption, and multitasking.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions:
- What is your budget? The Moto G24 is a budget option, while the Galaxy A35 is a mid-range device.
- What are your primary use cases? Basic communication vs. gaming, multimedia, multitasking.
- How important are display quality and performance? The Galaxy A35 significantly outperforms the Moto G24 in these areas.
My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A35
While the Moto G24 offers a lower price point and lighter weight, the Samsung Galaxy A35 provides a significantly superior overall user experience. The AMOLED display, powerful processor, better camera, longer software support, and extra storage outweigh the price difference for me. The performance gap between the Helio G85 and Exynos 1380 is substantial, making the A35 a much more future-proof choice. The superior display alone drastically improves daily interaction with the phone. I value performance, longevity, and a quality screen, making the Galaxy A35 the clear winner for my needs.
