Motorola Moto G24 vs Apple iPhone 16 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 6, 2024 September 20, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.45 cm³ 82.43 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.62 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 181 g 170 g
Height 163.5 mm 147.6 mm
Width 74.5 mm 71.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Ice Green
  • Blueberry
  • Pink Lavender
  • Black
  • White
  • Pink
  • Teal
  • Ultramarine

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.1 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 1179 x 2556
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 86.4 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 460 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 1000 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 2000 nits
Peak Brightness 537 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 95.70 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.31 mAh/cm³ 43.2 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 3561 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Apple A18 (3 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Apple GPU (5-core graphics)

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort 1
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, DisplayPort

Software

Operating System Android iOS
Initial OS Version 14 18
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureCategoryMotorola Moto G24Apple iPhone 16Practical Impact
DimensionsDesign163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm147.6 x 71.6 x 7.8 mmiPhone 16 is noticeably smaller and slightly thinner, making it more pocketable and easier to handle.
WeightDesign181 g170 gThe iPhone 16 is lighter, further enhancing one-hand usability.
BuildDesignNot specifiedNot specifiedMaterial differences could impact durability and premium feel. This information is missing.
Display TypeDisplayIPS LCD, 90HzSuper Retina XDR OLEDiPhone 16's OLED offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially brighter highlights, resulting in a more vibrant viewing experience.
Display SizeDisplay6.56"6.1"Moto G24 offers a larger screen for media consumption, while the iPhone 16 prioritizes one-handed use.
ResolutionDisplay720 x 1612 (269 ppi)1179 x 2556 (460 ppi)iPhone 16 boasts much sharper text and images due to its higher resolution and pixel density.
Refresh RateDisplay90HzNot specifiedA 90Hz refresh rate on the Moto G24 makes scrolling and animations smoother compared to a standard 60Hz display (assuming iPhone 16 is 60Hz as the spec is missing).
Peak BrightnessDisplay537 nits2000 nits (HBM), 1000 nits (typical)The iPhone 16 should be significantly brighter, especially in direct sunlight, ensuring better outdoor visibility.
ChipsetPerformanceMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Apple A18 (3nm)The A18 in the iPhone 16 is expected to be significantly more powerful, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUPerformanceOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)Hexa-core (2x4.04 GHz + 4x2.20 GHz)iPhone 16's CPU, built on a more advanced process, likely offers superior performance and efficiency.
GPUPerformanceMali-G52 MC2Apple GPU (5-core)iPhone 16 likely provides a substantial advantage in graphics-intensive tasks like gaming and video editing. Apple typically leads in GPU performance.
RAMPerformance8GB8GBBoth phones have the same RAM, which should be sufficient for multitasking, though the iPhone's superior processor might make better use of it.
StoragePerformance128GB256GB/512GBiPhone 16 offers larger storage options for users with extensive media libraries or who download many apps.
Battery CapacityBattery5000 mAh3561 mAhMoto G24 has a larger battery capacity suggesting potentially longer battery life. However, real-world usage depends on software optimization and power efficiency of the chipset.
OSSoftwareAndroid 14iOS 18Different operating systems cater to different user preferences regarding customization, app ecosystems, and privacy features.
Video CapabilitiesCamera1080p@30fps4K@60fps (HDR), 1080p@240fps (HDR)iPhone 16 offers significantly better video recording capabilities with higher resolution, frame rates, and HDR support.
Camera specificsCameraNot specifiedNot specifiedDetailed camera specifications (sensor size, aperture, lens type) are needed for a comprehensive comparison.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G24 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Better for media consumption.
  • Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity suggests better endurance, but real-world performance is unknown.
  • Lower Price: Positioned in the "low price" range, offering greater affordability.

Apple iPhone 16 Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: The A18 chip delivers a vastly superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Quality Display: OLED technology offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and higher brightness.
  • Superior Video Recording: Captures higher resolution and frame rate video with HDR.
  • Premium Design: While materials are not specified, iPhones generally have a more premium build quality.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G24: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large screen for media consumption and basic smartphone functionality. Ideal for casual browsing, social media, and light gaming.

Apple iPhone 16: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and excellent camera capabilities. Ideal for power users, gamers, content creators, and those who value a seamless user experience within the Apple ecosystem.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G24 is significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? The iPhone 16 offers significantly better performance.
  3. Which operating system do you prefer? Android and iOS offer distinct experiences.

My Choice: Apple iPhone 16

While the Motorola Moto G24 offers a larger display and potentially longer battery life at a lower price, the iPhone 16's significant performance advantage, superior display quality, and advanced video capabilities make it a compelling choice for me. I prioritize a smooth and responsive user experience, high-quality visuals, and the ability to capture excellent photos and videos. I am willing to pay a premium for these features. Although the battery capacity is smaller, Apple's chip efficiency often results in competitive battery life despite smaller batteries. The lack of detailed camera specs makes a full judgment impossible, but Apple's track record suggests strong camera performance. Ultimately, the iPhone 16's overall package offers a more compelling value proposition for my needs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.