Motorola Moto G24 Power vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 7, 2024 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 109.63 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.33 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 197 g 213 g
Height 163.5 mm 161.1 mm
Width 74.5 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Glacier Blue
  • Ink Blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 537 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 139.43 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 54.73 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 6000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G24 PowerSamsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions163.5 x 74.5 x 9 mm161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2 mmThe A55 is slightly shorter, narrower, and thinner.
Weight197g213gThe G24 Power is noticeably lighter.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDAMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency in dark mode.
Display Size6.56"6.6"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 1612 (HD+)1080 x 2340 (FHD+)A55 has a significantly sharper display with more detail.
Refresh Rate90Hz120HzA55 offers smoother scrolling and animations.
Peak Brightness537 nits1000 nits (HBM)The A55 will be much more visible in direct sunlight. Missing specific typical brightness for A55 limits full comparison.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55's 4nm chipset will likely offer significantly better performance and power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.7 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55 boasts faster and more powerful CPU cores for demanding tasks and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Xclipse 530A55's GPU should provide a better gaming and graphics-intensive application experience.
RAM8GB8GB/12GBMore RAM options on the A55 can improve multitasking.
Storage128GB256GBA55 provides double the storage.
Battery
Capacity6000 mAh5000 mAhG24 Power has a larger battery, likely resulting in longer battery life.
Camera
Rear CameraNot specifiedNot specifiedCamera quality cannot be compared without detailed specifications.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fpsA55 offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording.
Other
OSAndroid 14Android 14 (up to Android 18)A55 has longer guaranteed software updates.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTGA55 supports USB On-The-Go for connecting peripherals.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G24 Power Advantages:

  • Longer Battery Life: The massive 6000mAh battery should provide significantly longer usage time.
  • Lighter Weight: Noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower Price: Belongs to a lower price range, offering potentially better value for budget-conscious users.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, 120Hz refresh rate, and higher brightness provide a drastically better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: A more powerful processor, GPU, and RAM options translate to smoother operation, better multitasking, and enhanced gaming capabilities.
  • More Storage: Double the base storage capacity compared to the G24 Power.
  • Longer Software Support: Guaranteed updates up to Android 18.
  • Higher Quality Video Recording: Supports 4K video recording.

Trade-offs:

  • Battery Life vs. Performance: G24 Power prioritizes battery life, while the A55 favors performance.
  • Price vs. Features: A55 offers significantly better features but at a higher price point.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G24 Power: Ideal for users who prioritize battery life above all else, light users who primarily use their phone for basic tasks, and budget-conscious buyers.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Suitable for users who value a premium display and performance, gamers, multitaskers, and those who desire a longer software update cycle.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The G24 Power is a budget-friendly option, while the A55 is a mid-range device.
  2. What is your primary use case? For basic tasks and long battery life, the G24 Power is sufficient. For demanding tasks, gaming, and media consumption, the A55 is superior.
  3. How important is software update longevity? The A55 offers longer term software support.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Motorola Moto G24 Power excels in battery life, the Samsung Galaxy A55 offers a significantly better overall user experience. The superior display, performance, longer software support, and enhanced video recording capabilities outweigh the advantage of a larger battery for my personal needs. I prioritize a smooth and responsive experience with a high-quality display, and I am willing to pay the premium for the A55. The difference in battery capacity can likely be managed with charging habits, while the difference in performance and display quality will be noticeable every time I use the phone.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.