Motorola Moto G23 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 184.3 g 189 g
Height 162.7 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G23ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6ZTE is slightly larger and thicker. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)184.3189ZTE is slightly heavier, but the difference is minimal.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6ZTE offers a marginally larger screen.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical resolution; sharpness will be similar on both.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Both are entry-level chipsets; Helio G85 generally performs slightly better in benchmarks. Expect minor differences in daily tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G23 has slightly faster CPU cores, potentially resulting in quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1G57 architecture is newer; however, specific performance depends on implementation and clock speeds. Missing GPU frequency for ZTE makes direct comparison difficult.
RAM (GB)4/88ZTE offers 8GB in the compared variant, providing better multitasking and potentially smoother performance with demanding apps. Moto G23 also has an 8GB variant not included in this price comparison.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is identical, but image quality depends on sensor size, aperture, and processing.
Secondary Cameras5MP Wide, 2MP Macro0.3MP (unknown purpose)Moto G23 offers more usable secondary cameras. ZTE's 0.3MP camera is likely of very limited use.
Selfie Camera (MP)168Moto G23 has a higher resolution selfie camera, likely resulting in better quality selfies.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity suggests similar battery life, though actual usage will vary.
Fast Charging30W22.5WMoto G23 offers faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Slightly better CPU performance: Faster cores potentially lead to smoother multitasking and quicker app loading.
  • More versatile camera system: Usable wide and macro cameras compared to ZTE's practically unusable secondary camera.
  • Higher resolution selfie camera: Better quality selfies.
  • Faster charging: Less downtime.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Larger RAM in the compared variant: 8GB RAM enables smoother multitasking and better performance with demanding applications. Note the Moto G23 has an 8GB variant but not at the price point compared here.
  • Potentially newer GPU Architecture: Mali-G57 is newer than the G52, but without clock speed comparison for the ZTE, actual performance differences are unknown.
  • Lower Price: Offers a larger storage option (256GB) at a lower price than the Moto G23 (128GB).

Trade-offs:

  • Moto G23 sacrifices RAM capacity in this price comparison for a slightly better processor and camera system.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G compromises on camera quality and charging speed for a lower price and larger storage capacity.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G23: Users who prioritize a versatile camera system, slightly better performance, and faster charging, and are willing to pay slightly more for it. Suitable for:

  • Casual photography
  • Moderate gaming
  • Everyday tasks

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Budget-conscious users who need ample storage and prioritize price over camera quality and slightly faster performance. Suitable for:

  • Basic communication and web browsing
  • Storing large files (music, videos)
  • Light app usage

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE Blade A75 4G offers significantly more storage for a lower price.
  2. How important is camera quality to you? The Moto G23 has a more versatile and higher quality camera system.
  3. What are your performance needs? Moto G23 provides a slight edge in processing power, while the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers more RAM in the variant compared.

My Choice:

I would choose the Motorola Moto G23 (8GB/128GB variant), even if it's slightly more expensive than the ZTE Blade A75 4G 4GB/256GB. While the ZTE offers a compelling price-to-storage ratio, the significantly better camera system, faster processor, and faster charging of the Moto G23 are more important to me. The slightly diminished RAM in the 4GB Moto G23 compared to the 8GB ZTE is less appealing, so I'd opt for the 8GB/128GB Moto G23 if within budget. A good camera and a responsive phone are higher priorities for me than a massive amount of storage, which can be supplemented with cloud solutions if needed.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.