Motorola Moto G23 vs Xiaomi Redmi A3x - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 106.65 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.48 "/g
Weight 184.3 g 193 g
Height 162.7 mm 168.4 mm
Width 74.7 mm 76.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Midnight Black
  • Olive Green
  • Moonlight White (Starry White)
  • Aurora Green (Ocean Green)

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.71 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1650
Aspect Ratio 20:9 21:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 82.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 268 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.05 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 46.88 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Unisoc T603 (22 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core 1.8 GHz
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 8

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G23Xiaomi Redmi A3xPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2168.4 x 76.3 x 8.3Redmi A3x is slightly larger and heavier. May be less comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)184.3193Redmi A3x is noticeably heavier, potentially impacting long-term comfort.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.71Redmi A3x offers a slightly larger screen, providing marginally more immersive content consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1650Negligible real-world difference in sharpness due to similar pixel density.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar display technology; expect comparable color accuracy and viewing angles. However, Redmi A3x boasts 500 nits vs 400 nits peak brightness.
Performance
ChipsetHelio G85 (12nm)Unisoc T603 (22nm)Moto G23 likely offers better performance due to a more powerful chipset and more efficient fabrication process.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core 1.8 GHzMoto G23's CPU configuration suggests better multi-core performance and efficiency. Specific core details for Redmi A3x are lacking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1While G57 is a newer architecture, the MC2 in the G23 likely offers superior performance due to being a multi-core variant.
RAM4GB4GB (in 128GB Model) / 3GB (in 64GB Model)Both offer decent RAM for multitasking, but Redmi A3x's 3GB RAM option will likely struggle with demanding tasks and background processes.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Redmi A3x ships with a newer Android version, offering potential features and security updates. Moto G23's max Android version is unknown, a significant downside.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)508Moto G23's significantly higher resolution main camera suggests dramatically better image quality and detail.
Selfie Camera (MP)165Moto G23's higher resolution selfie camera will likely produce better quality self-portraits.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity suggests comparable battery life.
Fast Charging (W)3010Moto G23 supports significantly faster charging, reducing downtime.
Other
NFCYesNoMoto G23 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
PriceMediumLowRedmi A3x is significantly cheaper.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: More powerful processor and GPU.
  • Higher resolution cameras: Notably better image quality.
  • Faster charging: Less downtime.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments.
  • Potentially longer software support: While unknown, Motorola traditionally offers better support than Redmi devices in the A series

Xiaomi Redmi A3x Advantages:

  • Lower price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Slightly larger display: More immersive content viewing.
  • Newer Android version (at launch): Access to newer features and security updates out of the box.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G23: Users who prioritize performance, camera quality, faster charging, and NFC functionality. Suitable for gaming, photography, and general use.

Xiaomi Redmi A3x: Budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, browsing, and social media. Not recommended for demanding applications or photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? If price is a major constraint, the Redmi A3x is the more affordable option.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For demanding tasks, gaming, or photography, the Moto G23 is significantly better equipped.
  3. How important are features like NFC and fast charging? If these are essential, the Moto G23 is the clear choice.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G23

While the Redmi A3x offers a lower price, the Moto G23 provides significantly better value due to its superior performance, camera system, faster charging, and NFC functionality. The slightly larger screen of the A3x isn't a compelling enough advantage to offset the substantial performance gap and lack of key features. The unknown maximum Android OS version for the Moto G23 is a concern, but even without further updates, the overall package is more robust. The price difference is justifiable considering the long-term usability and overall better user experience offered by the Moto G23. For most users beyond the extremely budget-conscious, the Moto G23 is the better investment.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.