Motorola Moto G23 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 184.3 g 213 g
Height 162.7 mm 161.1 mm
Width 74.7 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G23Samsung Galaxy A55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2161.1 x 77.4 x 8.2A55 slightly wider but shorter. Negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight (g)184.3213G23 noticeably lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build MaterialsMissingMissingCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDA55 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.56.6Slight size difference, A55 offers marginally larger screen real estate.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340A55 significantly sharper and more detailed due to higher resolution (390 ppi vs 270 ppi). Impacts clarity of text, images, and videos.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120A55 provides smoother scrolling and animations due to higher refresh rate. Noticeable in gaming and UI navigation.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Exynos 1480 (4nm)A55 significantly more powerful due to newer and more efficient chipset built on a smaller process node. Expect faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)A55 boasts faster and more powerful CPU cores, leading to significant performance gains in demanding tasks.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Xclipse 530A55 has a more powerful GPU. Improved graphics rendering in games and visually demanding applications.
RAM4GB8GB/12GBA55 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance with multiple apps open.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPSimilar megapixel count, but A55 utilizes a superior Sony IMX906 sensor with larger pixel size (1.00 µm vs 0.64 µm) and pixel binning for better low-light performance.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA55 capable of recording significantly higher resolution video.
Front Camera16MP32MPA55 offers a higher resolution front camera for sharper selfies.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacities, but real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and display efficiency. A55's more efficient processor may contribute to longer battery life.
Fast Charging30W25WG23 slightly faster charging speed, but the difference might be negligible in practice.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Potentially Faster Charging: Though marginal, it could be advantageous for quick top-ups.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.

Samsung Galaxy A55 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology with higher resolution and refresh rate provides a significantly better viewing experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: Newer chipset, faster CPU and GPU, and more RAM translate to a smoother and more responsive user experience.
  • Better Camera System: Improved sensor, 4K video recording, and better low-light performance.
  • Longer Software Support: Expected to receive more OS updates than the G23.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G23: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, lightweight design, and long battery life. Suitable for:

  • Casual users primarily using social media, browsing, and making calls.
  • Users who prefer a lighter phone.

Samsung Galaxy A55: Users who value a premium display, smooth performance, good camera quality, and longer software support. Suitable for:

  • Mobile gamers.
  • Users who consume a lot of media (videos, photos).
  • Users who prioritize performance for multitasking and demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The G23 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the G23 suffices. For demanding tasks and media consumption, the A55 is better.
  3. How important is display quality and performance to you? The A55 significantly outperforms the G23 in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget: Choose the Moto G23.
  • Balanced Needs: Consider the Galaxy A55 if the price difference is justifiable for the significantly improved features.
  • Performance and Display Focused: Choose the Galaxy A55.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A55

While the Moto G23 offers a budget-friendly option, the Samsung Galaxy A55 provides a significantly better overall experience due to its superior display, performance, camera, and longer software support. The higher resolution, 120Hz AMOLED screen, powerful Exynos 1480 chipset, and improved camera system justify the higher price for most users. The longer software update commitment from Samsung also ensures a longer lifespan for the device. The weight difference, while noticeable, is not a significant deterrent for me compared to the significant advantages offered by the A55.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.