Motorola Moto G23 vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 May 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 104.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 184.3 g 195 g
Height 162.7 mm 162.1 mm
Width 74.7 mm 77.6 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Black
  • Lime Green
  • Blue gradient
  • Dark red

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 82.4 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 47.89 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G23Samsung Galaxy A24 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3A24 slightly wider and heavier
Weight (g)184.3195G23 noticeably lighter for one-handed use
Display
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDAMOLED offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency in dark mode
Size (inches)6.56.5Same screen size
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2340A24 significantly sharper and more detailed due to higher resolution
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations
Peak Brightness (nits)400 (peak)1000 (peak)A24 far more visible in direct sunlight
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm)G99 more power-efficient and offers better performance due to smaller node size
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz A76 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)A24 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, leading to smoother multitasking and faster app loading
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MC2A24 has a more powerful GPU, better for gaming and graphics-intensive tasks
RAM4GB (reviewed model)6GB (reviewed model)More RAM in A24 allows for better multitasking and less frequent app closures
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPComparable resolution, but sensor quality and image processing differ (details not provided)
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30fps with EISA24 has Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS) for smoother video recording
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Same battery capacity
Fast Charging30W25WG23 charges slightly faster

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Lighter and potentially more comfortable for extended use.
  • Slightly faster charging.

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Advantages:

  • Significantly better display: AMOLED technology, higher resolution, and much higher peak brightness result in a vastly superior visual experience.
  • More powerful and efficient processor: Leading to smoother performance in demanding tasks and potentially better battery life due to the 6nm process.
  • More RAM: Enables better multitasking.
  • Video Stabilization: EIS ensures smoother video recording.

Trade-offs:

  • The A24 is slightly heavier and wider.
  • The G23 has a lower price point (based on provided data).

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G23: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality, lightweight design, and fast charging. Best for:

  • Calling, texting, and light web browsing.
  • Users sensitive to phone weight.

Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: Users prioritizing display quality, performance, and overall user experience. Best for:

  • Media consumption (videos, photos).
  • Mobile gaming.
  • Demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The G23 is likely cheaper.
  2. What is most important to you: display quality, performance, or battery life? A24 excels in display and performance. Both have similar battery capacity but different processors, so real-world battery performance might vary.
  3. Do you frequently use your phone for media consumption or gaming? If so, the A24's superior display and performance are significant advantages.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G

While the Motorola Moto G23 offers a lighter design and slightly faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy A24 4G provides a significantly better overall user experience. The AMOLED display with its higher resolution and brightness is a major differentiator. Coupled with the more powerful and efficient processor and extra RAM, the A24 will provide smoother performance for everyday tasks, gaming, and media consumption. These advantages outweigh the slight increase in weight and the slower charging speed for me. The improved user experience justifies the likely higher price. A good display is crucial for enjoyable daily use, and the performance difference would be noticeable over time.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.