Motorola Moto G23 vs Motorola Moto G55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 September 6, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 96.6 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.63 "/g
Weight 184.3 g 179 g
Height 162.7 mm 161.6 mm
Width 74.7 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Forest Grey
  • Smoky Green
  • Twilight Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.49 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.3 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 118.71 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 51.76 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G23Motorola Moto G55Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2161.6 x 73.8 x 8.1Virtually identical in size and feel
Weight (g)184.3179Negligible weight difference in daily use
Display
Size (inches)6.56.49Negligible size difference
Resolution (px)720 x 16001080 x 2400G55 significantly sharper and more detailed due to higher resolution (405 ppi vs 270 ppi) impacting clarity of text, images, and videos
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120G55 provides smoother scrolling and animations, beneficial for gaming and general UI responsiveness
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer good color reproduction but may lack deep blacks compared to OLED displays
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7025 (6nm)G55 boasts a more powerful and efficient processor, leading to significantly improved performance in demanding tasks and potentially better battery life
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)G55's faster and more modern CPU cores deliver a noticeable performance boost in multitasking, app loading, and gaming
GPUMali-G52 MC2IMG BXM-8-256G55 has a superior GPU, resulting in smoother gaming and faster graphics rendering
RAM (GB)4/88G55 offers more RAM in the compared variant, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Comparable main camera resolution, image quality depends on sensor and processing which are not fully detailed
Ultrawide (MP)58G55's ultrawide offers slightly higher resolution
Macro (MP)2Not specifiedG23 has a dedicated macro lens, but its practical usefulness depends on implementation quality, missing information on G55 limits comparison
Selfie (MP)1616Comparable selfie camera resolution
Video Recording1080p@30fps1080p@30/60fpsG55 can record smoother 60fps video
Optical StabilizationNoYesG55 will likely produce more stable videos, especially in low light
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity, actual battery life depends on software optimization and chipset efficiency
Fast Charging30W30WBoth offer similar fast charging speeds

2. Key Differences Analysis

Moto G55 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Dimensity 7025 chipset, coupled with more RAM, provides a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Sharper and smoother display: Higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate provide a superior visual experience.
  • Improved camera features: Optical image stabilization and 60fps video recording enhance video quality. Wider ultrawide lens offers a broader field of view. 5G connectivity offers faster data speeds where available.

Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Potentially lower price: Given the older release date and lower specs, the G23 is likely more affordable.
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: While quality is unknown, it offers a feature not explicitly mentioned in the G55 specs.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G23: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, casual social media usage, and light gaming.

Moto G55: Users who value performance, a smooth and sharp display, better camera features, and future-proof connectivity with 5G. Ideal for mobile gaming, content consumption, and demanding tasks.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The G23 is likely cheaper.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Casual use vs demanding tasks/gaming.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The G55 offers a noticeable upgrade in both areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited budget, basic usage: Moto G23
  • Balanced budget, desire for good performance and display: Moto G55

My Choice: Motorola Moto G55

The Moto G55 offers a significantly superior user experience due to its more powerful processor, sharper display with a higher refresh rate, improved camera features (including OIS), and 5G connectivity. While the Moto G23 might be a more budget-friendly option, the performance and display improvements of the G55 justify the likely price difference for most users beyond those with the strictest budget constraints. The enhanced capabilities of the G55 ensure a smoother, faster, and more enjoyable overall smartphone experience making it a more future-proof choice.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.