Motorola Moto G23 vs Honor 200 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 May 31, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 100.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.41 "/g
Weight 184.3 g 199 g
Height 162.7 mm 163.3 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75.2 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Steel Blue
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Black
  • Pink
  • Moonlight White
  • Ocean Cyan

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.78 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1224 x 2700
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 90.8 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 437 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits 4000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 113.12 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 51.64 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8635 Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 735

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G23Honor 200 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2163.3 x 75.2 x 8.2Virtually identical in size and thickness.
Weight (g)184.3199Honor 200 Pro is noticeably heavier. May impact one-handed use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDOLEDOLED offers deeper blacks, better contrast, and potentially improved power efficiency.
Display Size (inches)6.56.78Honor 200 Pro has a larger display, better for media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16001224 x 2700Honor 200 Pro has significantly higher resolution, resulting in sharper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Honor 200 Pro's higher refresh rate provides smoother animations and scrolling.
Peak Brightness (nits)400 (peak)4000 (peak)Honor 200 Pro will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8s Gen 3 (4nm)Honor 200 Pro has a vastly more powerful and efficient processor, enabling smoother multitasking and demanding gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520)Significant performance difference; Honor 200 Pro offers flagship-level processing power.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 735Honor 200 Pro will offer significantly better gaming and graphics performance.
RAM (GB)4/812/16Honor 200 Pro offers much more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures in the background.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Resolution similar, but sensor details lacking for Moto G23, preventing in-depth comparison.
Other Cameras5MP Wide, 2MP Macro, 16MP Selfie12MP Wide, 50MP Telephoto, 50MP SelfieHonor 200 Pro offers a more versatile camera system with a telephoto lens and high-resolution selfie camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsHonor 200 Pro can record higher resolution video.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005200Similar battery capacities.
Fast Charging30W100W/66W WirelessHonor 200 Pro charges significantly faster, both wired and wirelessly.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G23 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While prices fluctuate, the Moto G23 is likely significantly cheaper.
  • Lighter Weight: Easier for one-handed use.

Honor 200 Pro Advantages:

  • Significantly Higher Performance: Smoother operation, better for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Superior Display: Sharper, brighter, and smoother with OLED technology and 120Hz refresh rate.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens for optical zoom and a higher resolution selfie camera.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces downtime.
  • More Future-Proof: Newer Android version with longer support window, 5G connectivity.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Honor 200 Pro is significantly more expensive.
  • Weight: The Honor 200 Pro is heavier.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G23: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, social media, web browsing. Not recommended for demanding tasks or gaming.

Honor 200 Pro: Users who value performance, a high-quality display, versatile camera, and fast charging. Suitable for demanding tasks, gaming, media consumption, and photography enthusiasts.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The price difference is significant.
  2. What are your primary smartphone uses? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications, gaming, photography.
  3. How important are display quality and performance?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Basic Use: Motorola Moto G23
  • Balanced Budget, Moderate Use: Consider other mid-range options with better performance than the G23.
  • Performance and Features Prioritized: Honor 200 Pro

My Choice: Honor 200 Pro

While significantly more expensive, the Honor 200 Pro offers a vastly superior user experience in almost every aspect. The performance difference alone would make a significant impact on daily use, and the improvements in display, camera, and charging speed are substantial. The Moto G23 is a budget device with limitations that would impact user experience in the long run. For me, the investment in the Honor 200 Pro is justified by the significantly better features and longevity. If budget is a primary concern, I would explore other mid-range options that offer a better balance between price and performance than the Moto G23.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.