Motorola Moto G22 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 4, 2022 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 104.55 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 185 g 222 g
Height 164 mm 162.3 mm
Width 75 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Cosmic Black
  • Mint Green
  • Iceberg Blue
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.82 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G22 vs. Samsung Galaxy M35: A User-Centered Comparison

Let's dive beyond the specs and explore these phones as complete user experiences. We'll uncover how design choices translate into real-world usability for diverse individuals.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMotorola Moto G22Samsung Galaxy M35User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android, likely clean and simpleSamsung One UI, feature-rich, potentially complexOne UI offers customization but might overwhelm new users. Stock Android provides a streamlined experience.
Interaction Flow90Hz refresh rate, smooth but not exceptional120Hz refresh rate, noticeably smoother transitionsM35 offers a more fluid, premium feel in daily use. Scrolling and animations are visibly smoother.
Accessibility FeaturesStandard Android accessibility optionsOne UI includes enhanced accessibility features (e.g., one-handed mode)M35 potentially more accessible for users with specific needs.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (185g), thinner (8.5mm)Heavier (222g), thicker (9.1mm)G22 significantly more comfortable for extended use, reducing hand fatigue.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using their phone for note-taking, research, and entertainment.

  • G22 Story: The student appreciates the G22's lightweight design during long lectures. The clean Android interface allows for focused note-taking without distractions. However, the lower resolution display makes reading research articles less enjoyable, and the slower processor can lead to occasional lags when multitasking.
  • M35 Story: The student enjoys the vibrant AMOLED display of the M35, making online research and multimedia consumption immersive. The powerful processor handles multitasking with ease, and the 120Hz refresh rate enhances the overall experience. However, the phone's weight becomes noticeable after extended use.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

  • For a senior user: The G22's lighter weight and simpler interface might be preferable, reducing the learning curve and physical strain.
  • For a young professional: The M35's powerful performance, stunning display, and advanced features would be more appealing for demanding tasks and entertainment.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Prioritize:

  • Ease of Use and Comfort: Choose the G22.
  • Performance and Visual Experience: Choose the M35.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Motorola Moto G22 offers a compelling case with its lightweight design and user-friendly interface, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy M35. The significantly improved performance, vibrant AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate, and advanced camera features (including optical image stabilization) create a more engaging and future-proof user experience. The added weight might be a minor drawback, but the overall benefits in terms of speed, visuals, and longevity outweigh this concern for me. As a technology communicator, I value devices that not only function well but also deliver a delightful and immersive user experience, and the M35 excels in this regard. The superior screen, smoother performance, and enhanced camera capabilities create a more compelling narrative of technological advancement and user empowerment.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.