Motorola Moto G22 vs Samsung Galaxy A55 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date March 4, 2022 March 15, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 104.55 cm³ 102.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.51 "/g 3.1 "/g
Weight 185 g 213 g
Height 164 mm 161.1 mm
Width 75 mm 77.4 mm
Thickness 8.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Pearl White
  • Cosmic Black
  • Mint Green
  • Iceberg Blue
  • Navy
  • Iceblue
  • Lilac
  • Lemon

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 82.9 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 268 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 47.82 mAh/cm³ 48.9 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765V/CB Helio G37 (12 nm) Exynos 1480 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53) Octa-core (4x2.75 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU PowerVR GE8320 Xclipse 530

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 14
Maximum OS Version 18

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G22 vs. Samsung Galaxy A55: A User-Centered Comparison

As a technology communications specialist, my goal is to help you understand these phones not just as lists of specs, but as tools that fit into your life. Let's move beyond the numbers and explore the real-world experience of using the Moto G22 and the Galaxy A55.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMoto G22Galaxy A55User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStock Android (likely)One UIOne UI offers more customization and features but can feel overwhelming to some. Stock Android is cleaner and simpler.
Interaction Flow90Hz Refresh Rate120Hz Refresh RateA55's smoother scrolling and animations provide a more premium feel. While 90Hz is good, 120Hz is noticeably better.
Display QualityIPS LCDAMOLEDThe A55's AMOLED screen offers vibrant colors and deeper blacks, making media consumption more enjoyable.
Design ErgonomicsLighter (185g)Heavier (213g)The G22 is more comfortable for extended use, especially one-handed. The A55's extra weight might be noticeable.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Capturing Memories on a Sunny Day:

Imagine you're at a park, trying to capture the vibrant colors of spring. The G22's 50MP camera might sound impressive, but the A55's larger sensor and superior image processing will likely produce more detailed and dynamic photos. Plus, the A55's wider aperture (f/1.8) allows for better low-light performance, capturing those magical golden hour moments with greater clarity. The A55 also offers a wide-angle lens, letting you capture more of the scene without stepping back.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User Profile: A Senior Citizen:

For a senior citizen, the G22's lighter weight and simpler interface could be advantageous. Stock Android is generally easier to navigate, and the phone's overall ease of use might be preferred over the feature-rich but potentially complex One UI. However, the A55's brighter AMOLED screen and larger text options could be beneficial for those with visual impairments.

User Profile: A Young Creative Professional:

The A55's powerful processor, higher resolution display, and superior camera features cater to a young creative professional's needs for content creation and multitasking. The faster charging speed also aligns with a busy lifestyle.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Choosing between these phones hinges on your priorities:

  • Prioritize Simplicity and Affordability: Moto G22
  • Prioritize Performance and Premium Features: Samsung Galaxy A55

My Choice:

As Sophia Rodriguez, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy A55. While the Moto G22 offers commendable simplicity and lightness, the A55's significant advantages in performance, display quality, and camera capabilities make it a more compelling overall package. The superior user experience offered by the vibrant AMOLED display, smoother 120Hz refresh rate, and faster processor outweighs the G22's advantages in weight and simplicity for me. The A55's future-proof features and longer software support also contribute to its long-term value. While the heavier weight is a consideration, the substantial upgrade in user experience justifies the trade-off. Ultimately, the A55 feels like a device designed for a richer, more engaging mobile experience, which aligns with my focus on user-centered technology.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.