Motorola Moto G14 vs Xiaomi Poco C65 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 8, 2023 November 6, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 95.35 cm³ 106.14 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.51 "/g
Weight 177 g 192 g
Height 161.5 mm 168 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78 mm
Thickness 8 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sky Blue
  • Steel Gray
  • Butter Cream
  • Pale Lilac
  • Black
  • Blue
  • Purple

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 600 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.44 mAh/cm³ 47.11 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G52 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G14Xiaomi Poco C65Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)161.5 x 73.8 x 8168 x 78 x 8.1Poco C65 is larger and slightly thicker. Moto G14 might be more comfortable for one-handed use.
Weight (g)177192Poco C65 is noticeably heavier, potentially impacting long-term comfort.
Build MaterialN/AN/AMissing information prevents comparison.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Poco C65 offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer similar display technology, expecting comparable color accuracy and viewing angles.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Moto G14 has a significantly sharper display (405 ppi vs 260 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)N/A90Poco C65's 90Hz refresh rate provides smoother scrolling and animations, leading to a more fluid user experience.
Brightness (nits)N/A450 (typ), 600(HBM)Poco C65's specified brightness suggests better outdoor visibility. Missing Moto G14 data prevents full comparison.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc T616Mediatek Helio G85Both chipsets are budget-oriented. Performance differences likely negligible for everyday tasks, though benchmarks would provide clearer details.
CPU2x2.0 GHz A75, 6x1.8 GHz A552x2.0 GHz A75, 6x1.8 GHz A55Similar CPU configurations suggest comparable performance for general tasks.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 generally offers better gaming performance than the G52. Moto G14 may have a slight edge in graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM8GB8GBBoth have the same RAM, suggesting similar multitasking capabilities.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer identical storage capacity.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacities suggest similar potential battery life, though real-world usage varies.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 13Both run the latest Android version.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments and data transfer.
SensorsAccelerometer, Gyro, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Compass, FingerprintMoto G14 includes a gyroscope sensor, beneficial for certain games and AR applications. Poco C65 has a compass.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Moto G14 Advantages:

  • Sharper Display: Higher resolution leads to a significantly clearer and more detailed visual experience.
  • Potentially Better GPU: Mali-G57 MP1 might offer a slight advantage in gaming and graphics performance.
  • Lighter and More Compact: Easier to handle and carry for extended periods.
  • Gyroscope Sensor: Enables features like motion-based gaming and AR applications.

Poco C65 Advantages:

  • Higher Refresh Rate: Smoother scrolling and animations result in a more fluid and responsive user interface.
  • Larger Display: More immersive experience for media consumption and gaming.
  • Higher Brightness: Potentially better visibility in bright outdoor conditions.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G14: Suitable for users prioritizing a sharp display, comfortable one-handed use, and potentially better gaming performance. Recommended for:

  • Users who consume lots of text and images
  • Casual mobile gamers
  • Users who prefer a compact and lightweight phone

Poco C65: Suitable for users who value a large, smooth display and good outdoor visibility. Ideal for:

  • Media consumption (videos, movies)
  • Users sensitive to screen smoothness
  • Users who prioritize a large screen over sharpness

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Display Priority: Do you prefer a sharper display or a larger display with a higher refresh rate?
  2. Size and Weight: How important is one-handed usability and overall comfort?
  3. Outdoor Usage: How often do you use your phone in bright sunlight?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Focus on Media Consumption: Poco C65 offers a larger and smoother display for an immersive experience.
  • Sharp Display for Reading and Browsing: Moto G14's higher resolution screen is better for text and image clarity.
  • Compact Phone for Easy Handling: Moto G14 is lighter and smaller, making it more comfortable for one-handed use.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G14

Reasoning: While the Poco C65 offers a smoother and larger display, the significantly sharper resolution of the Moto G14 is more appealing to me. I prioritize clear text and image quality for web browsing, reading, and general use. The lighter and more compact form factor is also a plus for daily comfort. The potential performance advantage in gaming with the Mali-G57 GPU is another factor, though minor. While the 90Hz refresh rate is desirable, the significant difference in resolution would likely impact my daily usage more than the smoother scrolling. Finally, while lacking specific brightness data for the Moto G14 is a limitation, the combination of factors leans me towards prioritizing the sharper display and more compact design.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.