Motorola Moto G14 vs Samsung Galaxy M35 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 8, 2023 May 24, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.35 cm³ 116.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 2.97 "/g
Weight 177 g 222 g
Height 161.5 mm 162.3 mm
Width 73.8 mm 78.6 mm
Thickness 8 mm 9.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sky Blue
  • Steel Gray
  • Butter Cream
  • Pale Lilac
  • Gray
  • Light Blue
  • Dark Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 83.8 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 390 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1000 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 137.74 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.44 mAh/cm³ 51.69 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 6000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) Exynos 1380 (5 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G68 MP5

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G14Samsung Galaxy M35Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.5 x 73.8 x 8 mm162.3 x 78.6 x 9.1 mmThe Galaxy M35 is slightly larger and thicker.
Weight177 g222 gThe Moto G14 is noticeably lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.5"6.6"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
TypeIPS LCDSuper AMOLEDThe Galaxy M35's AMOLED display offers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2340Virtually identical pixel density, resulting in similar sharpness.
Refresh RateNot specified120 HzThe 120Hz refresh rate on the M35 will provide a significantly smoother and more responsive user experience, especially for gaming and scrolling.
Brightness (Peak)Not specified1000 nits (HBM)The M35's higher peak brightness will ensure better visibility in direct sunlight. The lack of data for the G14 prevents a complete comparison.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)Exynos 1380 (5 nm)The Exynos 1380, built on a smaller process node, should offer significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the Unisoc T616.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The M35 has faster and more powerful CPU cores, leading to smoother multitasking and app performance.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G68 MP5The M35's GPU is significantly more powerful, enabling better gaming performance and smoother graphics rendering.
RAM8GB8GBBoth phones have the same amount of RAM.
Storage256GB256GBBoth phones offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps, 720p@480fps (all with EIS)The Galaxy M35 offers significantly better video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution, higher frame rates, and Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS). Lack of detailed camera specs limits further analysis.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh6000 mAhThe Galaxy M35 boasts a larger battery capacity, potentially translating to longer battery life.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14The M35 ships with a newer version of Android, potentially offering more features and longer software support.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-C 2.0, OTGThe M35 supports On-The-Go (OTG) for connecting peripherals like flash drives.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G14 Advantages:

  • Lighter and potentially more affordable: Its lower weight enhances one-handed usability and portability. Belonging to a lower price range makes it potentially more budget-friendly.

Samsung Galaxy M35 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Exynos 1380 chipset and more powerful GPU provide a significantly smoother and faster user experience.
  • Better Display: The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and fluid animations.
  • Enhanced Camera: The capability to record 4K video and higher frame rates makes it a better choice for content creation.
  • Larger Battery: The 6000mAh battery potentially provides longer usage time.
  • Newer OS: Android 14 may offer features and security updates not available on Android 13.

Trade-offs:

  • The Galaxy M35's superior performance and features come at the cost of a higher price and a heavier, slightly larger device. The Moto G14 prioritizes affordability and portability over cutting-edge performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G14: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality, lightweight design, and affordability. Suitable for:

  • Casual users primarily focused on calling, texting, and light web browsing.
  • Users seeking a secondary phone.
  • Students or seniors on a budget.

Samsung Galaxy M35: Users who demand smooth performance, a vibrant display, a capable camera, and long battery life. Suitable for:

  • Mobile gamers.
  • Content creators who shoot photos and videos.
  • Users who consume a lot of media on their phones.
  • Users who multitask heavily.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G14 is expected to be significantly more affordable.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? Casual users may find the Moto G14 sufficient, while power users will appreciate the M35's performance.
  3. Do you prioritize portability and comfort or performance and features? The G14 is lighter and easier to handle, while the M35 offers a more premium experience.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy M35

While the Motorola Moto G14 offers excellent value for its anticipated price, the Samsung Galaxy M35 is the superior device overall. The significantly faster processor, smoother 120Hz AMOLED display, enhanced camera capabilities, and larger battery make it a more compelling choice for my needs. I prioritize a fluid user experience, long battery life, and a great display, and I'm willing to pay a premium for these features. The slightly larger size and weight are acceptable trade-offs for the substantial performance gains. The newer Android OS also suggests longer-term software support, which is a crucial factor in my decision.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.