Motorola Moto G14 vs Oppo Reno11 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date August 8, 2023 January 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 95.35 cm³ 95.32 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.68 "/g
Weight 177 g 182 g
Height 161.5 mm 162.4 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74.3 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sky Blue
  • Steel Gray
  • Butter Cream
  • Pale Lilac
  • Wave Green
  • Rock Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.6 % 89.5 %
Pixel Density 405 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 52.44 mAh/cm³ 52.45 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Unisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G14Oppo Reno11Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions161.5 x 73.8 x 8 mm162.4 x 74.3 x 7.9 mmVirtually identical in size; negligible difference in hand feel.
Weight177g182gThe Moto G14 is slightly lighter, potentially more comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsNot specifiedNot specifiedCannot compare build quality and durability without more information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+The Reno11's AMOLED display offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors. HDR10+ support further enhances visual quality for compatible content.
Size6.5"6.7"Slightly larger screen on the Reno11 provides more immersive viewing experience.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Nearly identical resolutions; no discernible difference in sharpness.
Refresh RateNot specified120HzThe Reno11's 120Hz refresh rate delivers significantly smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid and responsive user experience.
Peak BrightnessNot specified950 nitsThe Reno11's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in direct sunlight. Lack of data for the Moto G14 prevents direct comparison.
Performance
ChipsetUnisoc Tiger T616 (12 nm)Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)The Dimensity 7050, built on a smaller process node, should offer better performance and power efficiency compared to the Tiger T616.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Reno11 boasts faster and more powerful CPU cores, translating to smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G68 MC4The Reno11's GPU is more powerful, enabling smoother gaming and better graphics performance.
RAM8GB12GBMore RAM on the Reno11 allows for more apps to run in the background without impacting performance.
Storage256GB256GBBoth offer the same storage capacity.
Camera
Video Capabilities1080p@30fps4K@30fps, up to 960fps slow-motionThe Reno11 offers significantly better video recording capabilities, including 4K resolution and high frame rate slow-motion. Details about camera sensors and image quality are missing for both phones.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, but real-world usage may vary depending on other factors like display and processor efficiency.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G14 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: Being in the "low price" range, it likely offers better affordability.
  • Slightly Lighter: Might be more comfortable for extended use.

Oppo Reno11 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with 120Hz refresh rate and HDR10+ provides a significantly better visual experience.
  • Significantly Better Performance: More powerful chipset, CPU, and GPU deliver smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and enhanced gaming capabilities.
  • More RAM: Enables smoother multitasking and prevents performance slowdowns.
  • Superior Video Recording: 4K recording and high frame rate slow-motion offer much better video quality and creative options.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G14: Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and affordability. Suitable for calling, texting, web browsing, and light media consumption.

Oppo Reno11: Users who value a premium multimedia experience, smooth performance, and advanced features like high refresh rate display and 4K video recording. Suitable for demanding tasks like gaming, video editing, and content creation.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G14 is a budget option, while the Reno11 is a mid-range device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and multimedia consumption.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Reno11 offers a significant upgrade in these areas.

My Choice: Oppo Reno11

While the Moto G14 might be a good budget option, the Oppo Reno11 offers a significantly better overall experience due to its superior display, performance, and camera capabilities. The 120Hz AMOLED screen, powerful processor, and 4K video recording are compelling features that justify the higher price for me. The smoother user experience, better multitasking capabilities, and enhanced visual quality are worth the investment. While I acknowledge the Moto G14's potential price advantage, the Reno11's superior features would provide a more enjoyable and future-proof smartphone experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.