Motorola Moto G13 vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.54 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 189 g
Height 162.7 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Rose Gold
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Blue Lavender
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G13ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6ZTE is slightly larger and thicker. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Weight (g)183.5189ZTE is slightly heavier. Negligible difference in everyday use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.6ZTE offers a marginally larger screen.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1612Virtually identical resolution; both are HD+ but not as sharp as FHD+ displays.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar display technology; expect decent color accuracy but lower contrast compared to AMOLED.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85Unisoc T606Both are entry-level chipsets; Helio G85 generally performs slightly better in benchmarks. Expect comparable performance for everyday tasks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55)Moto G13 has slightly faster CPU cores, potentially leading to quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1G57 is a newer generation GPU architecture, but with a single core, its performance might be similar to the G52 MC2 in real-world usage. It's difficult to definitively determine the better GPU without benchmarks.
RAM (GB)48 (as tested)ZTE offers more RAM in the tested variant, enabling better multitasking and app switching.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Similar megapixel count; image quality will depend on sensor and software processing. More information needed on sensor specifics for both phones to draw accurate comparisons.
Other Cameras2MP Macro, 2MP Depth0.3MP unspecified, likely a depth sensorMoto G13 offers a dedicated macro lens, while the ZTE's second rear camera's functionality is unclear.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity; real-world battery life will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.
Fast Charging (W)2022.5ZTE offers slightly faster charging.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G13 Advantages:

  • Slightly faster CPU: Potentially better for demanding apps and multitasking.
  • Dedicated Macro Lens: Offers more versatility in photography.
  • Gyro Sensor: Enables features like image stabilization and some AR applications, absent in the ZTE Blade A75.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • More RAM in tested version: Significantly improves multitasking and app performance.
  • Slightly faster charging: Reduces downtime.
  • Slightly Larger Display: Offers a more immersive viewing experience.
  • Lower Price: Offers better value for budget-conscious users.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G13: Users who prioritize slightly better performance and camera versatility. Suitable for light gaming and everyday tasks.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Users on a tight budget who value multitasking and a larger display. Best for web browsing, social media, and general use. The larger RAM in the tested variant is a significant advantage.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE Blade A75 4G is generally more affordable.
  2. How important is multitasking? The ZTE Blade A75 4G with 8GB RAM offers a significant advantage here.
  3. Do you frequently use your phone for demanding tasks or gaming? The Motorola Moto G13's slightly faster processor might be preferable.

My Choice:

I would choose the ZTE Blade A75 4G (8GB RAM version). While the Moto G13 offers minor performance advantages, the ZTE Blade A75 4G's significantly larger RAM (in the tested configuration) is crucial for a smooth Android experience in the long run. 8GB allows for better multitasking and prevents the phone from slowing down as more apps are used and the OS updates. The slightly larger display and faster charging are also welcome additions. Considering its lower price point, the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers better overall value for the average user. The lack of gyro sensor is a drawback, but not a deal breaker for most users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.