Motorola Moto G13 vs Xiaomi Poco F5 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 May 1, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 95.45 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.54 "/g 3.69 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 181 g
Height 162.7 mm 161.1 mm
Width 74.7 mm 75 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Rose Gold
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Blue Lavender
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 88.9 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits 1000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 112.39 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 52.38 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 725

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G13Xiaomi Poco F5Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2161.1 x 75 x 7.9Poco F5 is slightly smaller and thinner. Negligible difference in real-world usage.
Weight (g)183.5181Negligible weight difference.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and materials cannot be compared due to missing information.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCDAMOLEDPoco F5 offers significantly better contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors due to AMOLED technology.
Display Size (inches)6.56.67Poco F5 has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution720 x 16001080 x 2400Poco F5 has a much sharper display with higher pixel density (395 vs 270 ppi), resulting in clearer text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Poco F5 offers smoother scrolling and animations thanks to the higher refresh rate.
Peak Brightness (nits)4001000Poco F5 is much brighter, making it easier to use outdoors in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4nm)Poco F5 boasts significantly more powerful CPU and GPU, resulting in much faster performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510)Poco F5's CPU architecture is significantly more modern and powerful.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Adreno 725Poco F5's GPU offers significantly better graphics performance.
RAM4GB8GB/12GBPoco F5 offers more RAM, enabling better multitasking and smoother performance.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5064Poco F5 has a higher resolution main camera.
Video Recording1080p@30fps4K@30fpsPoco F5 can record videos at a much higher resolution.
FeaturesOISPoco F5 offers Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) for smoother videos and better low-light photos.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both phones have the same battery capacity.
Fast Charging (W)2067Poco F5 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Poco F5 Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset provides a substantial leap in processing power compared to the Helio G85. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and a superior gaming experience.
  • Superior Display: The AMOLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate offers vibrant colors, deep blacks, and smooth scrolling, providing a far more enjoyable viewing experience.
  • Faster Charging: 67W fast charging significantly reduces downtime compared to the 20W charging on the Moto G13.
  • Higher Resolution Camera with OIS: The 64MP main camera and the inclusion of OIS enable better image quality, particularly in low-light conditions and video recording.

Moto G13 Advantages:

  • Potentially Lower Price: While prices fluctuate, the Moto G13 is generally positioned in a lower price bracket.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G13: Suitable for budget-conscious users who primarily use their phones for basic tasks like calling, texting, web browsing, and social media. Not recommended for demanding tasks like gaming or heavy multitasking.

Poco F5: Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a high-quality display, and fast charging. Well-suited for mobile gamers, content creators, and users who multitask heavily.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Poco F5 is significantly more expensive.
  2. What are your primary phone usage patterns? For basic tasks, the Moto G13 might suffice. For demanding tasks, the Poco F5 is a better choice.
  3. How important is display quality and performance to you? The Poco F5 offers a significantly better experience in these areas.

My Choice: Xiaomi Poco F5

The Poco F5 offers a substantial upgrade in performance, display quality, and charging speed, making it a much more compelling device overall. While the Moto G13 might be suitable for extremely budget-conscious users with basic needs, the Poco F5 provides a significantly better user experience for a wider range of tasks. The superior AMOLED display, powerful chipset, faster charging, and better camera make the Poco F5 the clear winner, even with the higher price tag. The long-term value proposition of the Poco F5, due to its superior performance and features, outweighs the price difference for most users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.