Motorola Moto G13 vs Realme Note 50 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 January 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 102.59 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.54 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 186 g
Height 162.7 mm 167.2 mm
Width 74.7 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Rose Gold
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Blue Lavender
  • Midnight Black
  • Sky Blue

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits 560 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 48.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G13Realme Note 50Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2167.2 x 76.7 x 8Realme Note 50 is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)183.5186Negligible weight difference in practical use.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Realme Note 50 offers a slightly larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (pixels)720 x 1600720 x 1600Same resolution, but Realme's larger display results in a lower pixel density (260 ppi vs 270 ppi), potentially making text and images slightly less sharp.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, expecting similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85Unisoc Tiger T612Helio G85 generally benchmarks higher than the Tiger T612, suggesting better performance in demanding tasks and gaming for the Moto G13.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto G13 has slightly faster CPU cores, potentially leading to quicker app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57 MP1Mali-G52 MC2 is generally considered more powerful than the Mali-G57 MP1 found in the Realme Note 50, giving the Moto G13 an edge in graphics performance.
RAM (GB)43/4 (version dependent)4GB RAM on the Moto G13 will generally provide smoother multitasking compared to the 3GB RAM version of the Realme Note 50.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5013Moto G13 boasts significantly higher resolution for the main camera, likely resulting in more detailed photos.
Front Camera (MP)85Moto G13 has a higher resolution front camera, potentially offering better selfie quality.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Both have the same battery capacity, but real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage.
Fast Charging (W)2010Moto G13 supports faster charging, reducing downtime.
Other
NFCYesNoMoto G13 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Price RangeMediumLowRealme Note 50 is positioned as a more budget-friendly option.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G13 Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Helio G85 chipset and more powerful GPU should provide a smoother experience, especially in gaming and demanding applications.
  • Better Camera System: The 50MP main camera and 8MP selfie camera offer higher resolution and potentially better image quality.
  • Faster Charging: 20W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the Realme's 10W.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other convenient features.

Realme Note 50 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Offers a slightly more immersive experience for media consumption.
  • Lower Price: More budget-friendly option for price-sensitive buyers.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G13: Users who prioritize performance, camera quality, and convenient features like NFC, and are willing to pay a slightly higher price. Suitable for:

  • Mobile Gamers: The more powerful GPU can handle games better.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: The higher resolution cameras will produce more detailed images.
  • Users who rely on contactless payments.

Realme Note 50: Budget-conscious users who prioritize a large display for media consumption and basic smartphone functionality. Suitable for:

  • Casual Users: Primarily using the phone for social media, browsing, and communication.
  • Media Consumers: The larger screen is beneficial for watching videos.
  • Users on a tight budget.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Realme Note 50 is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Gaming and photography benefit from the Moto G13's superior hardware, while media consumption favors the Realme Note 50's larger display.
  3. How important are features like NFC and faster charging? These are key advantages of the Moto G13.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G13

While the Realme Note 50 offers a larger display and lower price, the Motorola Moto G13 provides a significantly better overall package. The performance difference due to the chipset and GPU is crucial for a smooth user experience in the long run. The superior camera system, faster charging, and NFC functionality add considerable value. The slightly higher price is justified by these tangible benefits. While the Realme Note 50 is a decent budget option, the Moto G13 offers better long-term value and a more satisfying user experience for a broader range of users.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.