Motorola Moto G13 vs Realme C61 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C61
Realme C61
Realme

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 July 25, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 100.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.54 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 188 g
Height 162.7 mm 167.3 mm
Width 74.7 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Rose Gold
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Blue Lavender
  • Dark Green
  • Sparkle Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 560 nits
Peak Brightness 400 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 49.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G13Realme C61Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8Realme C61 is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)183.5188Negligible weight difference in real-world usage.
Display
Size (inches)6.56.74Realme C61 offers a slightly larger screen for media consumption.
Resolution (px)720 x 1600720 x 1600Identical resolution; sharpness will be similar, though slightly lower PPI on the C61 due to larger size.
Refresh Rate (Hz)9090Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 90Hz refresh rate.
Panel TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar color accuracy and viewing angles expected.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85Unisoc Tiger T612Both are entry-level chipsets; Helio G85 generally performs slightly better in benchmarks.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz A75 & 6x1.8 GHz A55)Moto G13 has a slight CPU clock speed advantage, potentially resulting in faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUMali-G52 MC2Mali-G57Mali-G57 is a newer generation GPU; potentially better gaming performance on the Realme C61, although specific benchmarks are needed for a definitive comparison.
RAM (GB)46 (in the compared variant)Realme C61's 6GB RAM enables better multitasking and app switching.
OSAndroid 13Android 14Realme C61 ships with a newer Android version, offering potential feature and security advantages.
Camera
Rear Camera (MP)50MP Main, 2MP Depth, 2MP Macro32MP Main, 2MP DepthMoto G13 boasts a higher resolution main sensor potentially capturing more detail. Real-world image quality depends on factors beyond resolution.
Front Camera (MP)8MP5MPMoto G13 has a higher resolution selfie camera.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity; similar battery life expected depending on usage.
Fast Charging (W)20W45WRealme C61 offers significantly faster charging.
Other
NFCYesNoMoto G13 supports contactless payments and data transfer via NFC.
Price RangeMediumLowRealme C61 is generally more affordable.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G13 Advantages:

  • Slightly better CPU Performance: The slightly higher clock speed on the G13's CPU might provide a minor performance edge in day-to-day tasks.
  • Higher Resolution Main Camera: The 50MP sensor could potentially capture more detail than the C61's 32MP sensor.
  • NFC: Enables contactless payments and other NFC functionalities.

Realme C61 Advantages:

  • Larger Display: Offers a more immersive experience for media consumption.
  • More RAM: 6GB RAM ensures smoother multitasking and handles more demanding applications better.
  • Faster Charging: 45W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Lower Price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.
  • Newer OS: Android 14 might offer feature and security benefits.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G13: Suitable for users who prioritize a slightly better camera, NFC functionality, and a smoother overall experience for everyday tasks.

Realme C61: Ideal for budget-conscious users who value a large display, fast charging, and ample RAM for multitasking, and don't require NFC. Good for media consumption and running multiple apps.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is NFC essential? If contactless payments are a must-have, the Moto G13 is the clear choice.
  2. What's your budget? The Realme C61 offers excellent value for its price.
  3. What's your primary use case? For media consumption and multitasking, the C61's larger display and extra RAM are beneficial. For general use and slightly better photos, the G13 might be preferable.

My Choice:

I would choose the Realme C61. While the Moto G13 offers NFC and potentially a slightly better camera, the C61's combination of a larger display, more RAM (in this 6GB variant), significantly faster charging, newer Android OS, and lower price makes it a more compelling overall package for me. I prioritize performance and value, and the C61 delivers in those areas. I can live without NFC, and the differences in camera quality likely won't be significant in everyday use for me. The 45W fast charging is a major convenience, and the larger display enhances media consumption. Ultimately, the C61 offers more of what I value in a smartphone at a lower price point.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.