Motorola Moto G13 vs Honor Magic V3 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 24, 2023 July 19, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 99.66 cm³ 98.98 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.54 "/g 3.5 "/g
Weight 183.5 g 226 g
Height 162.7 mm 156.6 mm
Width 74.7 mm 145.3 mm
Thickness 8.2 mm 4.35 mm
Foldable Design No Yes
Available Colors
  • Rose Gold
  • Matte Charcoal
  • Blue Lavender
  • Red
  • Snow
  • Velvet Black
  • Tundra Green

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 7.92 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 2156 x 2344
Aspect Ratio 20:9 16:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.9 % 88.6 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 400 nits 1800 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 82.10 mAh/in²
Battery Density 50.17 mAh/cm³ 52.03 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5150 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Mali-G52 MC2 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G13Honor Magic V3Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.7 x 74.7 x 8.2156.6 x 145.3 x 4.35 (folded)Magic V3 significantly more compact when folded, but wider and heavier when unfolded due to its foldable nature. G13 is a traditional slab phone design.
Weight (g)183.5226G13 noticeably lighter for one-handed use. Magic V3's weight is expected for a foldable phone.
FoldableNoYesMagic V3 offers a larger screen in a pocketable size and flexible usage modes (tablet, laptop). G13 is more traditional.
Display
TypeIPS LCDFoldable LTPO AMOLEDMagic V3 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Size (inches)6.57.92 (unfolded)Magic V3 provides a significantly larger screen real estate for multitasking and media consumption.
Resolution720 x 16002156 x 2344 (unfolded)Much sharper and more detailed visuals on the Magic V3. G13's resolution is low for its size.
Refresh Rate (Hz)90120Smoother animations and scrolling on the Magic V3.
Peak Brightness (nits)4001800Magic V3 dramatically brighter and more visible in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetMediatek Helio G85 (12nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)Magic V3 vastly more powerful for demanding tasks, gaming, and multitasking. G13 suitable for basic use.
CPUOcta-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)Significant performance difference; Magic V3's CPU handles complex tasks with ease.
RAM4GB12GB/16GBMagic V3 allows for more apps to run in the background without performance slowdown.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Resolution similar, but sensor and processing likely differ significantly, impacting image quality.
Video Recording1080p@30fpsUp to 4K@60fps with OIS, EISMagic V3 capable of much higher resolution and smoother video recording with stabilization.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005150Similar battery capacities, but Magic V3's larger, higher resolution display and powerful processor could lead to faster battery drain.
Fast Charging20W66WMagic V3 charges significantly faster.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G13 Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.
  • Lighter Weight: More comfortable for extended use and one-handed operation.

Honor Magic V3 Advantages:

  • Significantly More Powerful: Superior performance for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Foldable Design: Offers versatility and a larger screen when needed.
  • Higher Quality Display: Brighter, sharper, and more vibrant visuals.
  • Faster Charging: Significantly reduces downtime.
  • Superior Camera Capabilities: Higher resolution video recording with stabilization.

Trade-offs:

  • Price: The Magic V3's advanced features come at a premium price.
  • Weight and Size: The foldable design makes the Magic V3 heavier and bulkier when unfolded.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G13: Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality: calling, texting, web browsing, social media. Not recommended for demanding tasks or mobile gaming.

Honor Magic V3: Suitable for power users, multitaskers, content creators, and mobile gamers who value cutting-edge technology, top-tier performance, and a versatile foldable design.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The G13 is a budget option, while the Magic V3 is a premium device.
  2. What are your primary smartphone use cases? Basic use vs. demanding tasks/gaming/content creation.
  3. Do you value portability and a large screen? The foldable Magic V3 offers both, but with added weight.

My Choice: Honor Magic V3

While the Motorola Moto G13 offers excellent value for its price, the Honor Magic V3 is the clear winner for me. The foldable design, combined with the vastly superior performance, stunning display, and advanced camera capabilities, makes it a compelling device. The higher price is justified by the significant jump in technology and user experience. I prioritize performance, a great display, and future-proof features, and the Magic V3 delivers on all fronts. The added versatility of the foldable screen outweighs the increased weight for my usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.