Motorola Moto G04s vs Realme C61 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Realme C61
Realme C61
Realme

General

Launch Date April 29, 2024 July 25, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 97.45 cm³ 100.09 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.67 "/g 3.59 "/g
Weight 178.8 g 188 g
Height 163.5 mm 167.3 mm
Width 74.5 mm 76.7 mm
Thickness 8 mm 7.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Sunrise Orange
  • Sea Green
  • Concord Black
  • Satin Blue
  • Dark Green
  • Sparkle Gold

Display

Screen Size 6.56 " 6.74 "
Resolution 720 x 1612 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 84.9 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 269 PPI 260 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 450 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 560 nits
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 116.19 mAh/in² 110.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 51.31 mAh/cm³ 49.96 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Unisoc T606 (12 nm) Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Mali-G57 MP1 Mali-G57

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G04s vs. Realme C61: A Holistic Technological Analysis

By Michael Chen, Technology Researcher

This analysis transcends a simple spec comparison, delving into the strategic technological implications of the Motorola Moto G04s and Realme C61. By mapping specifications to broader industry trends, we aim to provide actionable insights into the evolving mobile landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

Feature CategorySpecificationMotorola Moto G04sRealme C61Technological Context
Innovation PotentialChipsetUnisoc T606 (12 nm)Unisoc Tiger T612 (12 nm)Both utilize Unisoc chipsets, indicating a growing trend of budget-friendly processors challenging established players like Qualcomm and MediaTek. Slight performance differences likely exist, but real-world impact needs further investigation.
OSAndroid 14Android 14Both devices leverage the latest Android OS, ensuring access to current features and security updates. Long-term OS support will be a key differentiator.
NFCTrueFalseThe presence of NFC in the Moto G04s highlights its potential for mobile payments and data transfer, aligning with the growing trend of contactless interactions. Realme C61's lack of NFC could limit its utility in certain markets.
Ecosystem IntegrationStorage Options128GB/4GB RAM256GB/6GB RAMRealme C61 offers significantly more storage, catering to the increasing demand for media consumption and app usage on mobile devices. RAM difference could impact multitasking performance.
USBUSB Type-C 2.0USB Type-CBoth adopt the industry standard USB-C, but specifying the generation (2.0 vs. potentially higher in the C61) is crucial for data transfer speed analysis.
Performance MetricsCPUOcta-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.8 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Realme C61 boasts slightly higher clock speeds, potentially translating to marginal performance gains in everyday tasks. Benchmarking is necessary to quantify the difference.
GPUMali-G57 MP1Mali-G57Subtle GPU variations may exist; detailed graphical benchmark comparisons are needed to assess gaming and visual processing capabilities.
User Experience IndicatorsDisplay6.56" IPS LCD, 90Hz6.74" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (typ)Realme C61 offers a larger display and specifies brightness levels, indicating a potential advantage in outdoor visibility. Both feature 90Hz refresh rates for smoother scrolling and animations.
Battery5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacities suggest comparable battery life. However, optimization at the OS and chipset level will ultimately determine real-world performance. Fast charging capabilities (not specified) would be a significant differentiator.
Dimensions/Weight163.5 x 74.5 x 8mm, 178.8g167.3 x 76.7 x 7.8mm, 188gRealme C61 is larger and heavier, potentially impacting one-handed usability. Moto G04s might offer a more compact feel.

2. Strategic Technological Insights

Both devices represent the increasing democratization of technology, bringing features like 90Hz displays and large batteries to the budget segment. However, subtle differences hint at distinct strategic priorities:

  • Realme C61: Focuses on maximizing specifications within a low price point, prioritizing storage and potentially a brighter display.
  • Moto G04s: Emphasizes a balanced approach, including NFC for broader ecosystem integration, potentially sacrificing some performance for a more compact form factor.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

  • Realme C61: Targets users prioritizing media consumption and storage capacity, potentially appealing to a younger demographic or those in emerging markets with limited data access.
  • Moto G04s: Caters to users seeking a more well-rounded experience, including contactless payment options and a potentially more compact design, suitable for a broader range of users.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

Beyond immediate specifications, consider:

  • Long-term Software Updates: The duration of OS and security updates will significantly impact the device's lifespan and security.
  • Camera Performance: While not provided, camera quality is crucial. Independent reviews should be consulted.
  • Fast Charging: This feature significantly impacts daily usability. Research charging speeds and technologies.
  • Build Quality & Durability: Real-world reviews will shed light on long-term durability and build quality.

Conclusion:

Choosing between these devices depends on individual priorities. The Realme C61 offers a spec-heavy approach, while the Moto G04s prioritizes balanced features and NFC. This analysis provides a framework for informed decision-making, emphasizing the importance of understanding broader technological trends and long-term implications beyond initial specifications. Further research, including benchmark tests and user reviews, is recommended before making a final purchase decision.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.