Motorola Moto G04s vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Detailed Comparison
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G04s | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 163.5 x 74.5 x 8 mm | 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm (Folded) | Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more compact when folded, enhancing portability. However, it's thicker when unfolded. |
| Weight | 178.8 g | 189 g | Negligible weight difference in practical use. |
| Foldable | No | Yes | Razr 50 Ultra's folding design offers unique portability and a smaller footprint when closed. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.56" | 6.9" (Main), ~3.6" (Cover) | Razr offers a larger main display for immersive content but G04s provides a more traditional smartphone experience. The cover display on the Razr allows for quick interactions without unfolding. |
| Type | IPS LCD | Foldable LTPO AMOLED | Razr's AMOLED offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO. G04s's LCD might be visible in brighter sunlight. |
| Resolution | 720 x 1612 | 1080 x 2640 | Razr boasts significantly sharper visuals due to higher resolution and pixel density. |
| Refresh Rate | 90Hz | 165Hz | Razr provides a noticeably smoother scrolling and gaming experience with its higher refresh rate. |
| Peak Brightness | Not specified | 3000 nits | Razr's exceptional brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility, while G04s's unspecified brightness might be a limitation in direct sunlight. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Unisoc T606 (12 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) | Razr dramatically outperforms G04s in processing power, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and superior gaming capabilities. |
| CPU | Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz A75 & 6x1.6 GHz A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz X2 & 3x2.8 GHz A710 & 4x2.0 GHz A510) | Razr's CPU architecture provides a significant performance advantage for demanding tasks. |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MP1 | Adreno 730 | Razr offers significantly better graphics performance for gaming and visually intensive applications. |
| RAM | 4GB | 12GB | Razr's larger RAM allows for seamless multitasking and keeps more apps open in the background without performance slowdown. |
| Storage | 128GB | 256GB | Razr offers double the storage capacity of the G04s. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 3800 mAh | G04s has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. However, Razr's LTPO display and more efficient chipset could mitigate this difference. Real-world usage will vary. |
| Camera | Specifications for camera sensors, aperture, and other details are missing for both phones, preventing a detailed comparison. | ||
| Video Recording | 1080p@30fps | Up to 8K@30fps | Razr offers significantly higher video resolution and frame rate options, resulting in superior video quality. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Moto G04s Advantages:
- Potentially Longer Battery Life: Larger battery capacity suggests longer usage time, but real-world performance depends on usage patterns.
- Lower Price: Likely more affordable given the lower-end specifications.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:
- Significantly More Powerful: Superior chipset, CPU, GPU, and RAM provide a vastly smoother and faster user experience.
- Higher Quality Display: Foldable AMOLED with higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness delivers a premium visual experience.
- More Versatile Form Factor: Foldable design offers unique portability and a larger screen when needed.
- Superior Video Recording: Significantly higher resolution and frame rate options.
- Larger Storage Capacity: Double the storage compared to the G04s.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Moto G04s: Budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality, long battery life, and affordability. Suitable for:
- Casual users primarily focused on calling, texting, and web browsing.
- Users with limited budgets who prioritize battery life over performance.
Razr 50 Ultra: Users who value cutting-edge technology, premium design, top-tier performance, and are willing to pay a premium. Suitable for:
- Power users demanding seamless multitasking and high performance for gaming and demanding applications.
- Users who prioritize portability and a unique form factor.
- Content creators who require high-quality video recording capabilities.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more expensive.
- What are your primary smartphone usage patterns? Basic tasks vs. demanding applications and multitasking.
- Do you value portability and a unique design over raw performance and battery life? A foldable phone offers a different experience.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Limited Budget, Basic Usage: Moto G04s
- Demanding User, High Budget: Razr 50 Ultra
- Prioritize Portability and Style, Moderate Budget: Consider the Razr 50 Ultra if the foldable form factor is a high priority.
Note: The lack of complete camera specifications limits a comprehensive camera comparison. The "medium price" designation for both phones requires clarification as their specifications suggest they likely fall into different price segments.
