Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A24 4G: In-Depth Comparison
1. Specification Breakdown
Design & Build
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dimensions | 169.5 x 77.5 x 9.4 mm | 162.1 x 77.6 x 8.3 mm | Moto G is taller and thicker, making it bulkier. A24 is more compact. |
| Weight | 217.5g | 195g | A24 is significantly lighter, better for one-handed use. |
| Build Quality | Plastic body | Plastic body | Both are budget phones with similar build materials. |
Display
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Screen Size | 6.8" IPS LCD | 6.5" AMOLED | Moto G has a larger screen, but A24 has better contrast and colors. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 (387 PPI) | 1080 x 2340 (396 PPI) | Nearly identical sharpness, but A24 has deeper blacks. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | A24 offers smoother scrolling and animations. |
| Brightness | No data (likely ~500 nits) | 1000 nits (peak) | A24 is much better in sunlight. |
Performance
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chipset | Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm) | Helio G99 (6nm) | A24 has a more efficient and powerful chipset. |
| AnTuTu Score | 171,000 | 411,900 | A24 is 2.4x faster in benchmarks. |
| RAM Options | 4GB | 4/6/8GB | A24 offers more RAM, better for multitasking. |
| Storage | 128GB (non-expandable) | 128GB (non-expandable) | No difference. |
Camera
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Main Camera | 48MP (f/1.7) | 50MP (f/1.8) | Similar performance, but A24 has slightly better detail. |
| Ultrawide Camera | 16MP (f/2.2) | 5MP (f/2.2) | Moto G has a much better ultrawide. |
| Selfie Camera | 20MP (f/2.0) | 13MP (f/2.2) | Moto G has a higher-res selfie camera. |
| Extra Features | ToF sensor, macro lens | OIS (better stabilization) | A24 has better video stability. |
Battery & Charging
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G | Samsung Galaxy A24 4G | Real-World Implications |
|---|---|---|---|
| Capacity | 4000mAh | 5000mAh | A24 lasts 25% longer on a charge. |
| Charging Speed | 10W (slow) | 25W (faster) | A24 charges 2.5x faster. |
| Battery Tech | Li-Ion | Li-Polymer | Li-Polymer is slightly more efficient. |
2. Key Insights
Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G Strengths
✔ Better ultrawide camera (16MP vs 5MP)
✔ Higher-res selfie camera (20MP vs 13MP)
✔ Includes stylus support (for note-taking)
✔ 5G connectivity (faster network speeds)
Samsung Galaxy A24 4G Strengths
✔ Faster performance (Helio G99 vs Snapdragon 480)
✔ Better battery life (5000mAh vs 4000mAh)
✔ Superior display (AMOLED vs LCD, 90Hz refresh rate)
✔ Faster charging (25W vs 10W)
Trade-Offs
- Moto G is bulkier (217.5g vs 195g).
- A24 lacks 5G, but has a better processor.
- Moto G has a stylus, but A24 has a better screen and battery.
3. User Recommendations
Who Should Buy the Moto G Stylus 5G?
✔ Note-takers & artists (stylus support)
✔ 5G users (if network speed is a priority)
✔ Selfie lovers (20MP front camera)
Who Should Buy the Galaxy A24 4G?
✔ Gamers & power users (faster processor)
✔ Battery-conscious users (5000mAh + 25W charging)
✔ Media consumers (AMOLED + 90Hz display)
4. Buying Decision Framework
3 Key Questions to Ask
- Do you need a stylus? → Moto G Stylus 5G
- Do you want better battery & performance? → Galaxy A24 4G
- Do you prefer a better display & faster charging? → Galaxy A24 4G
Final Verdict
Winner: Samsung Galaxy A24 4G
- Better performance, battery, and display make it the best overall choice for most users.
- Moto G Stylus 5G is only better if you need 5G or a stylus.
Why I’d Choose the A24:
The faster processor, AMOLED screen, and 5000mAh battery make it a better daily driver for most people. The Moto G’s stylus is niche, and its slower charging & weaker chipset hold it back. Unless you absolutely need 5G or a stylus, the A24 is the smarter buy.
