Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G vs Samsung Galaxy A13 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 14, 2021 December 3, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 123.48 cm³ 110.74 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.13 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 217.5 g 195 g
Height 169.5 mm 164.5 mm
Width 77.5 mm 76.5 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Emerald
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85 % 81.1 %
Pixel Density 387 PPI 270 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 40.49 mAh/cm³ 45.15 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 700 (7 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 11
Maximum OS Version 12 14

Comparison Summary

Here’s a structured, user-focused comparison of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G and Samsung Galaxy A13 5G, grounded in real-world usability and technical trade-offs:


1. Specifications Breakdown

Design & Build

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5GSamsung Galaxy A13 5GReal-World Implications
Dimensions169.5 × 77.5 × 9.4 mm164.5 × 76.5 × 8.8 mmMoto is taller/thicker; A13 is more pocketable.
Weight217.5g195gA13 is 22.5g lighter—better for one-handed use.
Screen ProtectionUnknownGorilla Glass 3A13 has better scratch resistance.
Fingerprint SensorRear-mountedSide-mountedA13’s placement is more convenient.

Key Insight: The A13 wins for portability and durability, but the Moto’s larger size accommodates its stylus.


Display

FeatureMoto G Stylus 5GGalaxy A13 5GReal-World Implications
Size6.8"6.5"Moto’s screen is better for media/notes.
Resolution1080x2400 (387 PPI)720x1600 (270 PPI)Moto’s display is much sharper.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzA13 feels smoother in scrolling/gaming.
Panel TypeIPS LCDPLS LCDMoto has slightly better color accuracy.

Key Insight: The Moto’s higher resolution is great for detail-heavy tasks (e.g., sketching with the stylus), but the A13’s 90Hz refresh rate offers smoother motion.


Performance

FeatureMoto G Stylus 5GGalaxy A13 5GReal-World Implications
ChipsetSnapdragon 480 5G (8nm)Dimensity 700 (7nm)A13’s chip is more efficient and powerful.
AnTuTu Score171,000389,300A13 is 2.3x faster—better for multitasking/gaming.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G57 MC2A13 handles games like Genshin Impact better.

Key Insight: The A13 is the clear winner for performance, especially for gamers or power users.


Camera

FeatureMoto G Stylus 5GGalaxy A13 5GReal-World Implications
Main Camera48MP (f/1.7)50MP (f/1.8)Similar daylight performance; Moto’s wider aperture helps in low light.
Ultra-Wide16MP (f/2.2)❌ NoneMoto wins for landscape/group shots.
Selfie20MP (f/2.0)5MP (f/1.9)Moto’s selfies are far more detailed.
Video1080p@60fps, 120fps slow-mo1080p@30fpsMoto offers smoother video and slow-motion.

Key Insight: The Moto’s versatile camera system (ultra-wide, better selfies, slow-mo) makes it better for creatives.


Battery & Charging

FeatureMoto G Stylus 5GGalaxy A13 5GReal-World Implications
Capacity4000mAh5000mAhA13 lasts longer (25%+ more battery).
Charging Speed10W15WA13 charges faster (but both are slow).

Key Insight: The A13’s battery life is superior, but the Moto’s smaller battery may struggle with stylus use.


2. Key Insights

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G Strengths:

  • Best for creatives: Stylus support, sharper display, and ultra-wide camera.
  • Better selfies: 20MP vs. 5MP.
  • More versatile cameras: Ultra-wide and slow-motion video.

Samsung Galaxy A13 5G Strengths:

  • Faster performance: 2.3x higher benchmark score.
  • Longer battery life: 5000mAh vs. 4000mAh.
  • Smoother display: 90Hz refresh rate.

Trade-Offs:

  • Moto’s stylus is niche but useful; A13’s performance is broadly beneficial.
  • A13’s 720p display feels outdated next to Moto’s 1080p screen.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Choose the Moto G Stylus 5G if you:

  • Use a stylus for notes/drawing.
  • Prioritize camera versatility (ultra-wide, selfies).
  • Prefer a sharper screen for media.

Choose the Galaxy A13 5G if you:

  • Want better battery life and faster performance.
  • Prefer a lighter, more compact phone.
  • Value smoother animations (90Hz).

4. Buying Decision Framework

Ask yourself:

  1. Do I need a stylus or better cameras? → Moto.
  2. Is battery life or performance my priority? → A13.
  3. Do I prefer a sharper screen (Moto) or smoother motion (A13)?

Scenario-Based Picks:

  • Student/Artist: Moto (stylus, better display).
  • Gamer/Heavy User: A13 (performance, battery).
  • Budget-Conscious: A13 (better value for most users).

Final Verdict: Which Would I Choose?

I’d pick the Samsung Galaxy A13 5G. Here’s why:

  • The Dimensity 700’s performance gap is massive (2.3x faster), making everyday use smoother.
  • 5000mAh battery ensures all-day endurance.
  • 90Hz display feels more modern than the Moto’s 60Hz panel.

While the Moto’s stylus and cameras are appealing, the A13 delivers better overall value for most users. Unless you need the stylus, the A13 is the smarter buy.

Exception: If you’re a creative professional or prioritize media consumption, the Moto’s sharper screen and stylus might justify its trade-offs.


Would you prioritize the stylus or performance? Let me know your use case—I’m happy to refine the recommendation!

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.