Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date May 30, 2024 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2024 2024

Physical

Volume 100.95 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.53 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 190 g 189 g
Height 162.6 mm 164.1 mm
Width 74.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 8.3 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Caramel Latte
  • Scarlet Wave
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 89.1 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness 1200 nits N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 49.53 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 14 13
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Holistic Technological Analysis

This analysis delves beyond a simple specification comparison to provide a research-driven understanding of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) and ZTE Blade A75 4G within the broader mobile technology landscape.

1. Comprehensive Specification Mapping

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024)ZTE Blade A75 4GTechnological ContextInnovation PotentialEcosystem IntegrationPerformance MetricsUser Experience Indicators
Price RangeMediumLowReflects market segmentation and target audience.
Display6.7" P-OLED, 120Hz, 1200 nits (peak), 1080x24006.6" IPS LCD, 90Hz, 720x1612P-OLED signifies a shift towards superior display technology with power efficiency and vibrant colors.HighModerateHighHigh
ProcessorQualcomm Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm)Unisoc T606 (12nm)Node size (nm) indicates manufacturing process advancement; smaller nodes generally mean better efficiency.ModerateModerateModerateModerate
RAM/Storage8GB/256GB4GB/256GBImpacts multitasking, application performance, and user data storage capacity.ModerateModerate
OSAndroid 14 (upgradable to 15)Android 13OS version and upgrade path indicate software support and feature availability.ModerateHighModerateHigh
Connectivity5G4GRepresents different network access generations, impacting data speeds and latency.HighHighHighHigh
Battery5000mAh5000mAhBattery capacity influences usage time between charges.ComparableComparable
Stylus SupportYesNoDifferentiating feature for note-taking, drawing, and precise interaction.HighModerateHigh
SensorsAccelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer, Fingerprint (under display)Accelerometer, proximity, Fingerprint ($1-mounted)Sensor variety enhances user interaction and device functionality.ModerateModerateModerate

2. Strategic Technological Insights

  • Display Technology Disparity: The Moto G Stylus's P-OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate positions it in a higher tier, offering superior visual quality and smoother user experience compared to the Blade A75's IPS LCD with 90Hz. This reflects a broader trend of OLED adoption in mid-range devices.
  • Performance Gap: The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 in the Moto G Stylus promises significantly better performance and power efficiency compared to the Unisoc T606 in the Blade A75. This difference will be noticeable in demanding tasks and gaming.
  • 5G as a Differentiator: The Moto G Stylus's 5G capability is a crucial differentiator, providing access to faster download and upload speeds, lower latency, and future-proof connectivity.

3. User Ecosystem Alignment

  • Moto G Stylus: Aligns with users seeking a productivity-focused device with a stylus, good performance, and future-proof connectivity. It fits into a mid-range ecosystem with access to a wider range of applications and services.
  • ZTE Blade A75: Caters to budget-conscious users prioritizing basic functionality and long battery life. It operates within a more limited ecosystem, potentially with fewer software updates and feature enhancements.

4. Future-Oriented Decision Framework

  • Long-Term Value: The Moto G Stylus, with its superior processor, display, 5G connectivity, and Android updates, offers better long-term value and a smoother user experience over time.
  • Technological Advancement: The Moto G Stylus aligns more closely with ongoing trends in mobile technology, making it a more future-proof choice.
  • Price-Performance Ratio: While the Blade A75 offers a lower price point, the Moto G Stylus provides significantly more value for the moderate price increase, particularly in terms of performance, display, and connectivity.

Conclusion: The Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) represents a significant step up in terms of performance, display technology, and future-proofing compared to the ZTE Blade A75 4G. While the Blade A75 offers an attractive price for basic functionality, the Moto G Stylus provides a more compelling overall package for users seeking a richer and more sustainable mobile experience. The stylus further differentiates the Moto G, catering to a specific niche of users who value handwriting and precise on-screen interaction.

Michael Chen
Michael Chen

Technology Research Specialist focused on mobile innovation and strategic technology analysis.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology research
  • Consumer technology trend analysis
  • Strategic device evaluation
  • Technological innovation insights

Professional Vision Bridging technical analysis with forward-looking technological understanding, transforming complex research into meaningful insights.