Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) vs. Motorola Razr 50 Ultra
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) | Motorola Razr 50 Ultra | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 162.6 x 74.8 x 8.3 mm | 171.4 x 74 x 7.1 mm (folded) | Razr 50 Ultra is significantly more compact when folded, enhancing portability. However, it's taller unfolded. |
| Weight | 190g | 189g | Negligible weight difference. |
| Foldable | No | Yes | Razr's foldable design offers unique portability and a larger screen in a smaller form factor. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.9" | Razr offers a slightly larger main screen. |
| Type | P-OLED, 120Hz | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 165Hz | Razr's LTPO panel allows for dynamic refresh rate adjustment, saving battery. Higher refresh rate results in smoother animations and scrolling. |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 | 1080 x 2640 | Similar pixel density due to Razr's larger screen size. |
| Peak Brightness | 1200 nits | 3000 nits | Razr's significantly higher brightness ensures better outdoor visibility. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 | Razr uses a flagship chipset, offering significantly better performance for demanding tasks and gaming. |
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.8 GHz Cortex-A720 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A520) | Razr's CPU has a more powerful core configuration, resulting in faster processing speeds. |
| GPU | Adreno 710 | Adreno 735 | Razr's superior GPU provides a much better gaming and graphics-intensive application experience. |
| RAM | 8GB | 12GB | Razr offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and handling demanding applications. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000 mAh | 4000 mAh | Moto G Stylus has a larger battery capacity, potentially offering longer battery life. Razr's foldable design and powerful processor could drain the battery faster. |
| Other | |||
| Stylus | Yes (Integrated) | No | Moto G Stylus offers note-taking and drawing capabilities. |
| OS Updates | Up to Android 15 | Up to Android 17 | Razr will receive longer software support and updates. |
| Price Range | Medium | High (Presumed based on specs) | Significant price difference likely exists, with the Razr being more expensive. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) Advantages:
- Longer Battery Life (Potential): Larger battery capacity suggests potentially longer usage time.
- Integrated Stylus: Unique feature for note-taking, sketching, and precise screen interaction.
- Lower Price: Expected to be more affordable.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra Advantages:
- Foldable Design: Offers unparalleled portability and a larger screen in a compact form factor.
- Flagship Performance: Significantly faster processor and GPU for demanding tasks and gaming.
- Brighter Display: Superior outdoor visibility.
- Longer Software Support: Will receive OS updates for a longer period.
- Smoother Display: Higher refresh rate and LTPO technology.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Moto G Stylus 5G (2024): Ideal for budget-conscious users, students, and those who prioritize note-taking or drawing functionality. Excellent for everyday tasks, media consumption, and light gaming.
Motorola Razr 50 Ultra: Suitable for users who value cutting-edge technology, portability, and top-tier performance. Perfect for power users, multitaskers, and those who desire a unique, stylish device.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Budget: How much are you willing to spend?
- Performance Needs: Do you require top-tier processing power for demanding tasks and gaming?
- Portability vs. Battery Life: Is ultimate portability more important than potentially longer battery life?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Limited Budget, Note-Taker: Moto G Stylus 5G (2024) is the clear choice.
- Power User, Values Latest Technology: Motorola Razr 50 Ultra is the better option.
- Moderate User, Wants Portability: Razr 50 Ultra if budget allows; otherwise, consider smaller, non-folding alternatives for portability.
