Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 2, 2023 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 110.53 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 202 g 189 g
Height 162.8 mm 164.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.23 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)ZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6Moto is slightly smaller and thinner.
Weight (g)202189ZTE is noticeably lighter.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and material differences are unknown.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.6Same size.
Resolution (px)1080 x 2400720 x 1612Moto has a significantly sharper display (399 ppi vs 267 ppi), resulting in crisper text and images.
Refresh Rate (Hz)12090Moto's higher refresh rate delivers smoother scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology, implying similar color accuracy and viewing angles. However, specific panel quality can vary.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Moto's processor is significantly more powerful, enabling smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The 4nm process also suggests better power efficiency.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)Moto's CPU has faster cores, translating to a more responsive user experience.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G57 MP1Moto's GPU is more powerful, improving gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM (GB)88 (version dependent)RAM is comparable in the 8GB versions, enabling good multitasking. ZTE offers a 4GB version, which might limit performance.
Storage256GB (version dependent)256GB (version dependent)Storage is comparable in the 256GB versions. ZTE offers a 128GB version as well.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is similar, but sensor quality and image processing are unknown, making a direct comparison difficult.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps1080p@30fpsMoto offers higher resolution and frame rate video recording capabilities.
Front Camera (MP)168Moto has a higher resolution front camera.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Similar battery capacity, though real-world battery life depends on optimization and usage.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Significantly better performance: The Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 outperforms the Unisoc T606, offering a smoother and more responsive experience.
  • Sharper and smoother display: The higher resolution and refresh rate make for a more enjoyable visual experience.
  • Superior video recording: 4K recording and higher frame rates provide more detailed and smoother videos.
  • More comprehensive 5G band support: Offers broader compatibility with different 5G networks globally. Stylus functionality for note-taking and drawing.

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Lighter weight: More comfortable for extended use.
  • Lower price: Offers a more budget-friendly option.
  • Dual SIM: Supports two SIM cards simultaneously for users with multiple numbers.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Ideal for users who prioritize performance, a good display, and 5G connectivity. Suitable for gaming, media consumption, and multitasking. The stylus makes it a good choice for students or note-takers.

ZTE Blade A75 4G: Best suited for budget-conscious users who prioritize basic functionality and long battery life. Suitable for light usage like calling, texting, and web browsing. The dual SIM is beneficial for travelers or those with multiple phone numbers.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The ZTE is significantly cheaper.
  2. What level of performance do you need? The Moto offers a much better performance experience.
  3. What are your primary use cases? The Moto is better for gaming and media consumption, while the ZTE is sufficient for basic tasks. Stylus support on the Moto may be crucial for some.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)

While the ZTE Blade A75 4G is a more budget-friendly option, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) offers a significantly better overall package. The superior processor, display, and camera, along with 5G connectivity and stylus functionality, justify the higher price for most users. The performance difference will be noticeable in daily use, and the sharper display provides a much more enjoyable viewing experience. The ZTE's only significant advantages are its lighter weight and lower price, which might not be enough to outweigh the Moto's superior features for many users. Ultimately, the Moto provides a more future-proof and satisfying smartphone experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.