Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) vs vivo X100 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 2, 2023 November 21, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 110.53 cm³ 109.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.07 "/g
Weight 202 g 221 g
Height 162.8 mm 164.1 mm
Width 73.8 mm 75.3 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne
  • White
  • Sunset Orange
  • Startrail Blue
  • Asteroid Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 89.8 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 452 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 117.47 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.23 mAh/cm³ 49.1 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5400 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 9300 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)
GPU Adreno 710 Immortalis-G720 MC12

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)vivo X100 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2164.1 x 75.3 x 8.9Vivo is slightly larger and heavier.
Weight (g)202221Vivo is noticeably heavier in hand.
BuildUnspecifiedUnspecifiedBuild quality and material differences cannot be determined.
StylusYesNoMoto G offers note-taking and drawing capabilities.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzLTPO AMOLED, 120HzVivo offers significantly better contrast, colors, and potentially power efficiency due to LTPO.
Display Size6.6"6.78"Vivo has a slightly larger screen.
Resolution1080 x 24001260 x 2800Vivo has a sharper display with higher pixel density.
Peak BrightnessUnspecified3000 nitsVivo will be significantly more visible in direct sunlight. Missing Moto brightness limits comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1Dimensity 9300Vivo offers significantly more powerful CPU and GPU, leading to smoother multitasking and gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.25 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-X4 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A720)Vivo's CPU architecture is more modern and powerful.
GPUAdreno 710Immortalis-G720 MC12Vivo offers a substantial improvement in graphics performance.
RAM8GB (as tested)16GB (as tested)Vivo's larger RAM allows for more apps to run in the background without reloading.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8850MP, f/1.75, 1" sensorVivo utilizes a much larger sensor, capturing more light and detail, especially in low light.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.250MP, f/2.0Vivo significantly upgrades the ultrawide in resolution and quality.
TelephotoNo50MP, f/2.5,Vivo offers optical zoom capability, absent in the Moto.
Video4K@30fps8K@30fpsVivo can record higher resolution videos.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5400 mAhVivo has a slightly larger battery. Real-world battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging SpeedUnspecifiedUnspecifiedCharging speed comparison is not possible with available data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Integrated Stylus: Offers convenient note-taking and sketching.
  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable.

vivo X100 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: Significantly faster processor and more RAM for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • High-Quality Display: Brighter, more vibrant AMOLED with higher resolution and LTPO for potentially better battery life.
  • Advanced Camera System: Larger main sensor, higher resolution ultrawide and telephoto lens, improved low-light performance, and 8K video recording.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Budget-conscious users who prioritize note-taking, casual gaming, and basic smartphone functionality. Students or individuals who frequently need a stylus for handwriting or drawing.

vivo X100 Pro: Users who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and a cutting-edge camera system. Mobile photographers, videographers, and gamers would appreciate its capabilities.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G is significantly cheaper.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Stylus use vs. high-performance needs.
  3. How important is camera quality? The Vivo offers a vastly superior camera experience.

At the end, write what you would choose and explain why!

I would choose the vivo X100 Pro. While significantly more expensive, the substantial upgrades in performance, display, and camera outweigh the price difference for me. I prioritize a smooth user experience, a vibrant display for media consumption, and a capable camera for capturing high-quality photos and videos. The integrated stylus of the Moto G, while useful for some, is not a feature I personally require. The Vivo's powerful Dimensity 9300 processor and ample RAM will ensure a future-proof device capable of handling demanding tasks for years to come. The superior camera system with its large sensor and versatile lenses is a major selling point. While the Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) offers excellent value for its price, the vivo X100 Pro provides a significant leap in overall quality and user experience that aligns better with my personal needs and priorities.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.