Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) vs vivo iQOO 12 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 2, 2023 November 14, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 110.53 cm³ 100.33 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.42 "/g
Weight 202 g 198.5 g
Height 162.8 mm 163.2 mm
Width 73.8 mm 75.9 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne
  • Black
  • Red
  • White (BMW M branding)

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.78 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1260 x 2800
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 453 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 144 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A 1400 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 3000 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.77 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.23 mAh/cm³ 49.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 710 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)vivo iQOO 12Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2163.2 x 75.9 x 8.1iQOO 12 is slightly larger but thinner.
Weight (g)202198.5Negligible weight difference.
Build(Missing)(Missing)Material differences could impact durability and premium feel; information needed for accurate comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzLTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144HziQOO 12 offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, smoother scrolling, and potentially better power efficiency due to LTPO.
Size (inches)6.66.78iQOO 12 has a slightly larger display.
Resolution1080 x 24001260 x 2800iQOO 12 has a sharper display with higher pixel density.
Peak Brightness (nits)(Missing)3000Missing peak brightness for Moto makes comparison incomplete. iQOO 12's high brightness ensures excellent outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1Snapdragon 8 Gen 3iQOO 12 boasts significantly faster CPU and GPU performance, enabling smoother multitasking and high-end gaming.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)iQOO 12's more powerful CPU architecture delivers noticeable performance gains in demanding applications.
RAM8GB12/16GBiQOO 12 offers more RAM, improving multitasking and app responsiveness.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8850MP, f/1.69iQOO 12's wider aperture may allow for better low-light performance. Sensor model difference (OV50A vs OV50H) suggests potential variations in image quality.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.250MP, f/2.0iQOO 12 has a dramatically superior ultrawide camera with much higher resolution and a wider aperture.
Telephoto(Missing)64MP, f/2.6, 3x Optical ZoomiQOO 12 offers optical zoom for capturing distant subjects without quality loss.
Video4K@30fps8K@30fpsiQOO 12 supports higher resolution video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhSimilar battery capacity. Actual battery life depends on usage and optimization.
Charging Speed(Missing)(Missing)Charging speed comparison impossible without data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Stylus Support: (Assumed due to name) Offers precise input for note-taking and drawing.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Positioned in the "medium price" range, it likely costs less than the iQOO 12.

vivo iQOO 12 Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a substantial performance advantage for demanding tasks and gaming.
  • Higher Quality Display: The LTPO AMOLED panel delivers better colors, contrast, and refresh rate.
  • More Versatile Camera System: Includes a high-resolution ultrawide and a telephoto lens with optical zoom.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Ideal for budget-conscious users who prioritize note-taking, casual gaming, and general smartphone usage.

vivo iQOO 12: Suitable for power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts who demand top-tier performance, a premium display, and a versatile camera system.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G Stylus is likely more affordable.
  2. What are your primary use cases? Note-taking vs. gaming/photography.
  3. How important is performance and display quality? The iQOO 12 excels in these areas.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Limited Budget, Note-Taker: Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)
  • Power User, Mobile Gamer: vivo iQOO 12
  • Balanced User, Good Value: More information needed on pricing; potentially the Moto G Stylus if price difference is significant.

My Choice: vivo iQOO 12

While missing some specifics like pricing and build materials make a definitive conclusion slightly challenging, the vivo iQOO 12 is the clear winner based on the available data. The substantial performance upgrade with the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3, the superior AMOLED display with higher resolution and refresh rate, and the significantly more versatile camera system outweigh the potential price difference and the Moto G Stylus' assumed stylus functionality. For my use case, which prioritizes performance, a great screen, and a good camera, the iQOO 12 is the better choice. I am willing to pay a premium for these features. However, if budget is extremely tight and note-taking is a primary need, the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) might be a more suitable option.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.