Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) vs Oppo Reno12 Pro - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 2, 2023 June 18, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 110.53 cm³ 89.39 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.72 "/g
Weight 202 g 180 g
Height 162.8 mm 161.5 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74.8 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 7.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne
  • Space Brown
  • Sunset Gold
  • Nebula Silver
  • Manish Malhotra

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 89.4 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.23 mAh/cm³ 55.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7300 Energy (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G615 MC2

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)Oppo Reno12 ProPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2161.5 x 74.8 x 7.4The Oppo is slightly smaller and noticeably thinner.
Weight (g)202180The Oppo is lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use.
BuildMaterial specifications missing for both, limiting comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+The Oppo's AMOLED offers deeper blacks, richer colors, and HDR support for superior visual quality.
Size (inches)6.66.7Negligible difference in screen size.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical resolution; sharpness is comparable.
Peak BrightnessNot specified1400 nitsOppo's much higher brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1Dimensity 7300Both are mid-range chipsets, but benchmarks suggest the Dimensity 7300 might offer a slight performance edge.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)The Oppo has slightly higher clock speeds, potentially resulting in faster app loading and multitasking.
RAM8GB (specified version)12GB (specified version)The Oppo's significantly larger RAM allows for smoother multitasking and less frequent app reloading.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G615 MC2Both are capable GPUs for mid-range gaming; specific performance comparisons require further benchmarks.
Camera
Main Camera50MP50MPSimilar megapixel count; image quality depends on sensor and processing.
Other Cameras8MP Wide + Macro, 16MP Selfie8MP Wide, 50MP Telephoto, 50MP SelfieThe Oppo features a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom and a significantly higher resolution selfie camera.
Video4K@30fps4K@30fps, up to 960fps slow-motionOppo offers superior slow-motion video recording capabilities.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacity; actual battery life depends on optimization and usage.
Charging SpeedNot specifiedNot specifiedCharging speed comparison is impossible without specific data.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Stylus Support: While not in the provided specs, this model is known to include a stylus for note-taking and drawing, a significant advantage for specific users.
  • Potentially Lower Price: Based on available price data, the Moto G Stylus is likely more affordable.

Oppo Reno12 Pro Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED with HDR10+ and higher brightness offers a significantly better viewing experience.
  • More Powerful Performance: Higher clock speeds, more RAM, and a potentially stronger GPU result in smoother performance.
  • Versatile Camera System: Telephoto lens enables optical zoom, and a high-resolution selfie camera caters to content creators.
  • More Recent OS: Ships with a newer Android version, potentially offering longer software support.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023):

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users, students, note-takers, casual users.
  • Use Cases: Note-taking, casual gaming, basic photography, everyday tasks.

Oppo Reno12 Pro:

  • Ideal User: Users prioritizing multimedia consumption, mobile photography enthusiasts, gamers seeking smoother performance.
  • Use Cases: Watching videos, gaming, photography with zoom capabilities, demanding applications.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions:

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G Stylus likely offers better value for budget-conscious buyers.
  2. What are your primary use cases? The stylus support of the Moto G might be crucial for some, while the Oppo excels in multimedia and photography.
  3. How important is display quality and performance? The Oppo offers significant advantages in these areas.

My Choice: Oppo Reno12 Pro

While the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) offers a unique feature with its stylus and likely a lower price point, the Oppo Reno12 Pro is the superior device overall. The AMOLED display with HDR10+, the more powerful processor and increased RAM, the versatile camera system with telephoto lens, and the newer Android OS with longer potential support outweigh the benefits of the stylus for my personal needs. I prioritize display quality, performance, and camera capabilities, making the Oppo the clear winner for me. However, if budget is extremely tight and note-taking is a primary need, the Moto G Stylus could be a compelling alternative.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.