Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) vs Oppo Reno10 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 2, 2023 July 15, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 110.53 cm³ 96.4 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.62 "/g
Weight 202 g 185 g
Height 162.8 mm 162.4 mm
Width 73.8 mm 74.2 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne
  • Ice Blue
  • Silvery Grey

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.7 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2412
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 89.6 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 394 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A 800 nits
Peak Brightness N/A 950 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 111.38 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.23 mAh/cm³ 51.87 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version 14

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)Oppo Reno10Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2162.4 x 74.2 x 8Moto is slightly taller and thicker. Oppo is slightly narrower and significantly thinner.
Weight (g)202185Oppo is noticeably lighter, improving one-handed use.
BuildPlasticNot specifiedImpacts durability and premium feel. Lack of info on Oppo limits comparison.
Display
Display TypeIPS LCD, 120HzAMOLED, 120HzAMOLED offers deeper blacks, vibrant colors, and potentially better power efficiency.
Size (inches)6.66.7Negligible size difference.
Resolution1080 x 24001080 x 2412Virtually identical resolution; sharpness will be similar.
Peak BrightnessNot specified950 nitsOppo's higher peak brightness ensures better visibility in sunlight. Missing Moto data limits full comparison.
HDRNo HDR support specifiedHDR10+Oppo supports HDR content for a wider dynamic range and more vibrant visuals.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm)Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Both offer mid-range performance. Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 generally benchmarks slightly higher, particularly in GPU tasks. 4nm process suggests potentially better power efficiency for Moto.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Oppo has slightly higher clock speeds on performance cores, but core configuration differences make direct performance comparison difficult without benchmarks.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G68 MC4Adreno 710 generally delivers stronger gaming performance.
RAM8GB (as reviewed)8GBEquivalent RAM capacity for multitasking.
Camera
Main Camera50MP, f/1.8864MP, f/1.7Oppo has a higher resolution main sensor and a wider aperture, potentially capturing more detail and light in low-light conditions.
Ultrawide8MP, f/2.28MP, f/2.2Comparable ultrawide cameras.
TelephotoNone32MP, f/2.0Oppo offers a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom, a significant advantage.
Selfie16MP, f/2.532MP, f/2.4Oppo's higher resolution selfie camera with a wider aperture should produce better self-portraits.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhIdentical battery capacities suggest similar battery life, but real-world usage will vary depending on other factors.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Stylus Support: A key differentiator, enabling note-taking, sketching, and precise screen interaction.
  • Potentially Better Power Efficiency: The 4nm chipset could result in longer battery life. However, this is not confirmed without real-world testing.

Oppo Reno10 Advantages:

  • Superior Display: AMOLED technology delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and HDR support for a better viewing experience.
  • More Versatile Camera System: The inclusion of a telephoto lens provides optical zoom capabilities missing in the Moto. Higher resolution sensors on main and selfie cameras.
  • Lighter and Slimmer Design: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Ideal for users who prioritize note-taking, sketching, or precise on-screen interaction. Students, artists, and anyone who prefers stylus input would benefit.

Oppo Reno10: Suited for users who value a premium multimedia experience with a vibrant display, versatile camera system, and sleek design. Good for photography enthusiasts, content consumers, and those who prioritize aesthetics.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is stylus functionality essential? If yes, the Moto G Stylus is the clear choice.
  2. Do you prioritize display quality and camera versatility? If yes, the Oppo Reno10 is the better option.
  3. What is your budget? Considering price differences within the "medium price" range is crucial.

My Choice

I would choose the Oppo Reno10. While the stylus functionality of the Moto G Stylus is attractive, the Oppo's superior display, more versatile camera system with a telephoto lens, and slimmer, lighter design are more compelling to me. The AMOLED screen with HDR10+ support will offer a significantly better viewing experience for media consumption, and the telephoto lens adds crucial flexibility for photography. I prioritize these aspects over the stylus, making the Oppo Reno10 the better fit for my personal preferences and usage patterns. I also appreciate the lighter weight and slimmer profile. While specific build materials for the Oppo aren't available, the overall package seems more compelling.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.