Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) vs Motorola Moto G54 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 2, 2023 September 5, 2023
Release Year 2023 2023

Physical

Volume 110.53 cm³ 95.41 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 3.67 "/g
Weight 202 g 177 g
Height 162.8 mm 161.6 mm
Width 73.8 mm 73.8 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 8 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne
  • Midnight blue
  • Indigo blue
  • Glacier blue
  • Mint green

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 85.5 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 405 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.23 mAh/cm³ 52.41 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7020 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 IMG BXM-8-256

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)Motorola Moto G54Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2161.6 x 73.8 x 8.0G54 is slightly shorter and noticeably thinner. Impacts pocketability and in-hand feel.
Weight (g)202177G54 is significantly lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
StylusYesNoStylus offers precise input for note-taking, drawing, and specific tasks. A significant differentiator if these features are important.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.5Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2400Identical resolution, resulting in similar sharpness on both devices.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations thanks to the 120Hz refresh rate.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth use IPS LCD technology. Expect similar color accuracy and viewing angles. Missing data on color depth and HDR capabilities limits a thorough comparison.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm)Dimensity 7020 (6nm)Both are mid-range chipsets. Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 generally offers better GPU performance, beneficial for gaming. Dimensity 7020 may have slight efficiency advantages due to the smaller process node.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55)Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)Slight difference in core configuration. Real-world performance differences likely minimal for everyday tasks.
GPUAdreno 710IMG BXM-8-256Adreno 710 generally considered more powerful, resulting in smoother gaming and graphics-intensive tasks.
RAM (GB)88 (up to 12GB available in some versions)Base RAM is the same. Higher RAM options on G54 could benefit multitasking and demanding applications.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)5050Megapixel count is the same, but sensor details (e.g., sensor size, pixel size) are missing for the G54, limiting a detailed comparison.
Video Recording4K@30fps1080p@60fpsStylus can record 4K video, offering higher resolution. G54 is limited to 1080p but can record at a smoother 60fps.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)50005000Identical battery capacity suggests similar battery life, although real-world usage may vary depending on software optimization and usage patterns.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Integrated Stylus: The key differentiator. Enables precise note-taking, sketching, and other stylus-driven interactions.
  • 4K Video Recording: Captures higher resolution video compared to the G54's 1080p.
  • Potentially Better Gaming Performance: Adreno 710 GPU generally outperforms the IMG BXM-8-256.

Motorola Moto G54 Advantages:

  • Lighter and Slimmer Design: More comfortable for one-handed use and pocket portability.
  • Dual SIM and eSIM Support: Offers greater flexibility for managing multiple phone numbers and data plans.
  • Bluetooth 5.3: Slightly newer Bluetooth version with potential for improved connectivity and efficiency. Potentially faster data transfer for supported accessories.
  • More Color Options: Provides greater aesthetic choices.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Ideal for students, artists, or anyone who values note-taking, sketching, or precise on-screen interaction. Also a good choice for those who prioritize 4K video recording.

Moto G54: Suitable for users who prioritize a lightweight and slim design, need dual SIM functionality, or value a slightly more affordable price point.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Is a stylus important to you? This is the most significant differentiating factor.
  2. Do you prioritize video recording quality or a lighter, slimmer phone?
  3. What is your budget? While both are mid-range, price differences might exist depending on storage configuration.

My Choice: Motorola Moto G54

While the stylus is a compelling feature, I prioritize a lightweight and slim phone for daily use. The Moto G54's lighter weight, slimmer profile, and Dual SIM capabilities are more appealing to my personal needs. I rarely record 4K video, and the performance differences between the two chipsets are unlikely to significantly impact my typical usage. The potential price advantage of the G54 further reinforces my decision. This is a subjective choice based on my usage patterns and preferences. Someone who heavily relies on a stylus would likely prefer the Moto G Stylus.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.