Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) vs Cubot KingKong X - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date June 2, 2023 July 23, 2024
Release Year 2023 2024

Physical

Volume 110.53 cm³ 262.7 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.27 "/g 1.7 "/g
Weight 202 g 388 g
Height 162.8 mm 170.9 mm
Width 73.8 mm 82.2 mm
Thickness 9.2 mm 18.7 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Cosmic Black
  • Rose Champagne
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.58 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2408
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 87.5 % 74.2 %
Pixel Density 399 PPI 401 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 235.59 mAh/in²
Battery Density 45.23 mAh/cm³ 38.83 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 10200 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6450 Snapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4 nm) Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 710 Mali-G68 MC4

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 N/A
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 13 14
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023)Cubot KingKong XPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions (mm)162.8 x 73.8 x 9.2170.9 x 82.2 x 18.7Cubot is significantly larger and thicker, potentially less pocketable.
Weight (g)202388Cubot is much heavier, impacting one-handed use and portability.
Build MaterialsUnspecifiedUnspecifiedDurability and premium feel cannot be compared without further information.
Display
Size (inches)6.66.58Negligible size difference.
Resolution (pixels)1080 x 24001080 x 2408Virtually identical sharpness.
Refresh Rate (Hz)120120Both offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Display TypeIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar color accuracy and viewing angles expected.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 6 Gen 1 (4nm)Dimensity 7050 (6nm)Dimensity 7050 generally offers slightly better performance but potentially higher power consumption due to the less efficient 6nm process.
CPUOcta-core (4x2.2 GHz A78 & 4x1.8 GHz A55)Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz A78 & 6x2.0 GHz A55)Cubot has slightly higher clock speeds, potentially resulting in faster app loading and multitasking.
GPUAdreno 710Mali-G68 MC4Performance differences will vary based on specific tasks and games, further benchmarking required for definitive comparison.
RAM8GB (reviewed version)16GB (reviewed version)Cubot offers significantly more RAM, enabling better multitasking and preventing app closures.
Storage256GB (reviewed version)512GB (reviewed version)Cubot offers double the storage.
Camera
Main Camera (MP)50100Higher megapixel count on Cubot doesn't guarantee better image quality; sensor size and processing are crucial.
Front Camera (MP)1632Cubot has a higher resolution front camera, potentially better for selfies.
Video Recording4K@30fps4K@30fpsComparable video resolution.
Battery
Capacity (mAh)500010200Cubot has more than double the battery capacity, significantly extending potential usage time.
Charging SpeedUnspecifiedUnspecifiedCharging speed comparison not possible without further data.
Other
OSAndroid 13Android 14Cubot has the newer Android version with potential features and security updates.
NFCYesYesBoth support contactless payments.
StylusYesNoMotorola offers stylus functionality for note-taking and drawing.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023) Advantages:

  • Integrated Stylus: Offers precise note-taking and drawing capabilities.
  • Potentially More Compact and Lighter: Easier for one-handed use and pocket portability.

Cubot KingKong X Advantages:

  • Significantly Larger Battery: Much longer battery life.
  • More RAM and Storage: Superior multitasking and ample storage space.
  • Higher Resolution Cameras: Potential for better image quality, especially in the front camera. Needs further analysis due to sensor quality being unknown.
  • Newer Android Version: Access to the latest features and security updates.

Trade-offs:

  • Cubot's Size and Weight: While offering a larger battery, the Cubot's bulk might be undesirable for some users.
  • Motorola's Lower RAM and Storage: Could limit multitasking performance compared to the Cubot.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2023): Ideal for users who prioritize note-taking, drawing, or prefer a compact and lighter phone. Students, artists, or anyone who frequently uses a stylus would benefit.

Cubot KingKong X: Suitable for users who need exceptional battery life, ample storage, and prioritize performance for demanding tasks or extended usage without charging. Ideal for travelers, power users, or those in areas with limited access to charging.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is stylus functionality? If crucial, the Motorola is the only option.
  2. What is your priority: portability or battery life? The Motorola offers better portability, while the Cubot boasts significantly longer battery life.
  3. What is your budget and required storage/RAM? The Cubot offers more for a slightly higher price, particularly in terms of memory and storage.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Student on a Budget: Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G, offering note-taking capabilities and decent performance at a lower price.
  • Frequent Traveler: Cubot KingKong X, due to its extended battery life.
  • Power User: Cubot KingKong X, given its superior RAM, storage, and processing power.

My Choice: Cubot KingKong X

While the stylus functionality of the Motorola is attractive, the Cubot KingKong X's significantly larger battery, greater RAM and storage, and newer Android version outweigh the benefits for my personal needs. I prioritize long battery life and smooth performance for multitasking, making the Cubot a more compelling choice despite its larger size and weight. The higher resolution cameras are a potential bonus, but image quality ultimately depends on real-world testing and sensor/software quality which is not provided in the specs.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.