Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) vs Nothing Phone (1) - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date April 27, 2022 July 16, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 119.06 cm³ 100.16 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 215 g 193.5 g
Height 168.9 mm 159.2 mm
Width 75.8 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.3 mm 8.3 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Steel Blue
  • Seafoam Green
  • Black
  • White

Display

Screen Size 6.8 " 6.55 "
Resolution 1080 x 2460 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 21:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.8 % 85.8 %
Pixel Density 395 PPI 402 PPI
Refresh Rate 120 Hz 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A 500 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1200 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 108.13 mAh/in² 104.89 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.99 mAh/cm³ 44.93 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4500 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) Qualcomm SM7325-AE Snapdragon 778G+ 5G (6 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) Octa-core (1x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 642L

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 12 12
Maximum OS Version 15

Comparison Summary

Let's dive into a user-centered comparison of the Motorola Moto G Stylus 5G (2022) and the Nothing Phone (1). Instead of getting bogged down in technical jargon, we'll explore how these devices translate into real-world experiences for different users.

1. Design and Usability Assessment:

FeatureMoto G Stylus 5G (2022)Nothing Phone (1)User Experience Impact
Interface DesignStandard AndroidCustom AndroidNothing Phone's unique glyph interface offers a fresh, potentially more engaging interaction paradigm.
Interaction FlowStylus-drivenGesture-basedStylus offers precision for note-taking and drawing; Gesture control prioritizes speed and fluidity.
AccessibilityStandard AndroidGlyph NotificationsGlyphs could provide a unique visual notification system for hearing-impaired users.
Design ErgonomicsLarger, heavierSlimmer, lighterNothing Phone's lighter weight enhances comfort for extended use.

2. Narrative-Driven Feature Exploration:

Scenario: Imagine a student using the Moto G Stylus. They effortlessly jot down notes during a lecture, sketching diagrams directly onto the screen thanks to the integrated stylus. This tactile experience mirrors traditional pen-and-paper note-taking, fostering a more natural learning flow.

Now, picture a creative professional using the Nothing Phone (1). Its sleek design and unique glyph interface become conversation starters. The glyphs pulse with notifications, adding a subtle yet distinctive visual element to their workflow. The phone's superior processing power handles demanding creative apps with ease.

3. Inclusive Technology Evaluation:

User 1: Senior Citizen: The Moto G Stylus's larger screen and stylus might appeal to users with dexterity challenges. The stylus allows for precise interaction, minimizing frustration with smaller touch targets.

User 2: Young Professional: The Nothing Phone's sleek aesthetics, fast performance, and innovative features like wireless charging align with a fast-paced, tech-savvy lifestyle.

4. Design-Centric Decision Framework:

Beyond the Specs: Choosing between these phones hinges on individual priorities. If precise input and a larger screen are paramount, the Moto G Stylus excels. If design innovation, performance, and a unique user interface are more appealing, the Nothing Phone (1) stands out.

My Choice: The Nothing Phone (1)

While the Moto G Stylus offers valuable features like the stylus and larger battery, the Nothing Phone (1) resonates more with my personal design philosophy and technology preferences. Its unique glyph interface, combined with a sleek design and powerful performance, creates a compelling user experience. The commitment to a distinctive aesthetic and innovative interaction model sets it apart. While the smaller battery is a consideration, the overall package, including wireless charging, offers a compelling blend of form and function that aligns with my vision of a user-centered mobile experience. Furthermore, the superior camera of the Nothing Phone (1) and the OLED screen make it a clear winner for me. While I appreciate the utility of a stylus, the overall package offered by the Nothing Phone (1) is more appealing to me.

Sophia Rodriguez
Sophia Rodriguez

Technology Communications Specialist

Expert in transforming complex technological innovations into accessible, engaging narratives.

Key Strengths:

  • Technology storytelling
  • User experience design analysis
  • Inclusive technology communication
  • Design-driven technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with human-centered understanding.