Motorola Moto G Power (2022) vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 22, 2022 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2022 2024

Physical

Volume 120.23 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 203 g 189 g
Height 167.2 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.5 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.6 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 79.7 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.59 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU 8 Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU 8 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G Power (2022) vs. ZTE Blade A75 4G: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect these two budget-friendly contenders and see which one comes out on top for different user needs.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Dimensions167.2 x 76.5 x 9.4 mm, 203g164.1 x 75.8 x 8.6 mm, 189gThe ZTE is slightly smaller and noticeably lighter, making it more pocketable and comfortable for extended use.
Build MaterialsPlasticPlastic (assumed)Expect a similar feel in terms of durability and premium feel (or lack thereof). We'd need to handle them to confirm.
Display
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Size6.5"6.6"Negligible difference in screen real estate.
Resolution720x1600720x1612Virtually identical sharpness; you won't notice a difference in pixel density.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations, better than the standard 60Hz.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDExpect similar color accuracy and viewing angles.
Performance
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
ChipsetHelio G37Unisoc T606The ZTE Blade A75 4G boasts significantly higher benchmark scores (AnTuTu: ~240,000 vs ~160,000), indicating smoother multitasking and potentially better gaming performance.
RAM4GB4GB/8GBThe 8GB RAM option on the ZTE is a huge plus for power users, enabling seamless app switching and preventing slowdowns.
Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBThe ZTE offers more generous storage options, crucial for media-heavy users.
Camera
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Main Camera50MP f/1.850MP f/1.8Image quality likely similar in daylight; low-light performance needs real-world testing.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.08MPComparable selfie experience expected.
Extra LensesMacro, Depth SensorNoneThe Moto G Power offers more versatility with dedicated macro and depth sensors, although their quality remains to be seen.
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fpsBasic video recording capabilities on both.
Battery Life
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)ZTE Blade A75 4GReal-World Implications
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhExpect similar battery life, potentially lasting a full day on moderate usage.
Charging10W22.5WThe ZTE charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The ZTE Blade A75 4G pulls ahead with its more powerful processor and the option for 8GB of RAM.
  • Storage: The ZTE also offers more internal storage.
  • Charging: The ZTE's 22.5W fast charging is a major advantage over the Moto G Power's slow 10W charging.
  • Software: The ZTE ships with a more modern Android 13, offering potential feature and security advantages. The Moto G Power launched with Android 11, and updates are uncertain.
  • Versatility: The Moto G Power offers a slightly more versatile camera system with dedicated macro and depth lenses.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G Power (2022): Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize long battery life and occasional photography versatility but aren't heavy multitaskers or gamers.
  • ZTE Blade A75 4G: Suitable for users who want a more responsive phone with faster charging, ample storage, and the latest Android version. Great for moderate gaming and multitasking.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What's your budget? Both are budget phones, but the ZTE might be slightly more expensive depending on the storage/RAM configuration.
  2. What are your primary uses? For basic tasks like calling, texting, and browsing, both suffice. For gaming, multitasking, or media consumption, the ZTE is better equipped.
  3. How important is fast charging? If you hate waiting for your phone to charge, the ZTE's 22.5W fast charging is a significant advantage.

My Choice: ZTE Blade A75 4G

While the Moto G Power (2022) nails the basics of a budget phone, the ZTE Blade A75 4G offers a more compelling package overall. The significantly faster performance, more generous storage options, and notably quicker charging make it a more future-proof and enjoyable device to use daily. The updated Android version also adds to its appeal. Unless battery life is your absolute top priority and you're extremely sensitive to price differences, the ZTE Blade A75 4G seems like the smarter choice in this matchup. Having 8GB of RAM available in a budget phone is a game-changer for smoother multitasking, and the faster processor will make a noticeable difference in day-to-day usability.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.