Motorola Moto G Power (2022) vs Samsung Galaxy A33 5G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date February 22, 2022 April 20, 2022
Release Year 2022 2022

Physical

Volume 120.23 cm³ 95.72 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.44 "/g
Weight 203 g 186 g
Height 167.2 mm 159.7 mm
Width 76.5 mm 74 mm
Thickness 9.4 mm 8.1 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Black
  • Black
  • Blue
  • White
  • Peach

Display

Screen Size 6.5 " 6.4 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 79.7 % 83.7 %
Pixel Density 270 PPI 411 PPI
Refresh Rate 90 Hz 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 118.34 mAh/in² 122.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.59 mAh/cm³ 52.23 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Mediatek MT6765 Helio G37 (12 nm) Exynos 1280 (5 nm)
CPU 8 Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU 8 Mali-G68

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 11 12
Maximum OS Version 16

Comparison Summary

Motorola Moto G Power (2022) vs. Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: A Deep Dive

Let's dissect the Motorola Moto G Power (2022) and the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G, going beyond the spec sheet to uncover what truly matters for everyday use.

1. Specifications Breakdown

Design
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)Samsung Galaxy A33 5GReal-World Implications
Dimensions167.2 x 76.5 x 9.4 mm159.7 x 74 x 8.1 mmA33 is noticeably more compact and easier to handle.
Weight203g186gA33 is lighter, reducing hand fatigue during extended use.
Build Quality-Gorilla Glass 5A33 offers better screen scratch resistance.
Display
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)Samsung Galaxy A33 5GReal-World Implications
Size6.5"6.4"Negligible size difference.
Resolution720x16001080x2400A33 boasts sharper text and images due to significantly higher resolution.
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDA33's AMOLED screen delivers richer colors, deeper blacks, and better power efficiency.
Refresh Rate90Hz90HzBoth offer smooth scrolling and animations.
Performance
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)Samsung Galaxy A33 5GReal-World Implications
ChipsetHelio G37Exynos 1280A33's Exynos 1280 provides significantly faster performance for demanding tasks and smoother multitasking.
RAM4GB6GB/8GBA33 offers more RAM for smoother multitasking and less app reloading.
Storage64GB/128GB128GB/256GBA33 provides more base storage and a higher-tier option for storing large files and applications.
AnTuTu Score~159,800~475,448A33 delivers roughly three times the performance in benchmarks, translating to a much snappier experience.
Camera
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)Samsung Galaxy A33 5GReal-World Implications
Main Camera50MP f/1.848MP f/1.8While the Moto G Power has slightly higher resolution, the A33's larger sensor likely captures more light in low light.
Selfie Camera8MP f/2.013MP f/2.2A33 offers a higher resolution selfie camera for more detailed self-portraits.
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fpsA33 can record video in much higher resolution.
OISNoYesA33's optical image stabilization results in smoother videos and potentially better low-light photos.
Battery Life
FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2022)Samsung Galaxy A33 5GReal-World Implications
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhSimilar battery capacities suggest comparable battery life.
Charging10W25WA33 charges significantly faster, minimizing downtime.

2. Key Insights

  • Performance: The A33's Exynos 1280 and larger RAM capacity vastly outperform the Moto G Power's Helio G37, leading to a noticeably smoother and more responsive experience.
  • Display: The A33's AMOLED display provides vibrant colors and deeper blacks compared to the Moto G Power's LCD. The higher resolution on the A33 also makes a noticeable difference in sharpness.
  • Camera: While megapixel counts are close, the A33 benefits from optical image stabilization (OIS) for steadier videos and improved low-light performance. It also offers 4K video recording.
  • Charging: The A33's 25W fast charging significantly reduces charging time compared to the Moto G Power's 10W.

3. User Profiles and Recommendations

  • Moto G Power (2022): Best for budget-conscious users who prioritize long battery life and basic functionality. Suitable for light tasks like browsing, social media, and calls.
  • Samsung Galaxy A33 5G: Ideal for users who want a well-rounded phone with a great display, solid performance, capable cameras, and 5G connectivity. Suitable for moderate to heavy usage, including gaming and content consumption.

4. Buying Decision Framework

  1. What is your budget? The Moto G Power is typically more affordable.
  2. What are your performance needs? If you need a phone for demanding tasks or gaming, the A33 is the clear winner.
  3. How important is camera quality? The A33 offers better overall camera performance, particularly in video recording and low-light situations.

My Choice: Samsung Galaxy A33 5G

As a tech journalist focused on the interplay of specifications and real-world performance, I'd choose the Samsung Galaxy A33 5G. While the Moto G Power offers impressive battery life at a lower price point, the A33's superior performance, stunning AMOLED display, versatile camera system, and faster charging make it a far more compelling device for my needs. The significantly improved user experience justifies the price difference, offering a smoother, more enjoyable interaction with the device on a daily basis. The A33's future-proof 5G connectivity further solidifies its position as the better long-term investment. In the fast-paced world of mobile technology, the A33 offers a more complete package that aligns better with my demands for performance, visual fidelity, and overall user experience.

Alex Griffin
Alex Griffin

Technology analyst specializing in mobile devices and consumer electronics.

Core Expertise

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Consumer electronics evaluation
  • Technical specification interpretation
  • User experience insights

Professional Mission Empowering readers to make informed technology decisions by transforming intricate specifications into understandable, practical guidance.

Demystifying technology, one device at a time.