Motorola Moto G Power (2021) vs ZTE Axon 40 Ultra - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 May 13, 2022
Release Year 2021 2022

Physical

Volume 119.19 cm³ 100.96 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.33 "/g
Weight 206.5 g 204 g
Height 165.3 mm 163.3 mm
Width 75.9 mm 73.6 mm
Thickness 9.5 mm 8.4 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar Silver
  • Flash Gray
  • Silver
  • Gold
  • Black

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.8 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1116 x 2480
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 92.9 %
Pixel Density 266 PPI 400 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A 1500 nits

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 108.13 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.95 mAh/cm³ 49.53 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.00 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.50 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 730

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.1
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.1, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Moto G Power (2021) vs. ZTE Axon 40 Ultra

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2021)ZTE Axon 40 UltraPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 × 75.9 × 9.5 mm163.3 × 73.6 × 8.4 mmThe Axon 40 Ultra is slightly smaller and thinner, making it more pocketable. The Moto G Power is bulkier.
Weight206.5g204gBoth are similar in weight, likely feeling equally substantial in the hand.
Display
Size6.6"6.8"The Axon 40 Ultra offers a slightly larger screen for more immersive content consumption.
Resolution720x16001116x2480The Axon 40 Ultra's display is significantly sharper, resulting in clearer text and images.
PPI266400The Axon 40 Ultra's higher pixel density will make the display look much less pixelated and clearer
TechnologyIPS LCDAMOLEDThe Axon 40 Ultra's AMOLED screen offers deeper blacks, higher contrast, and more vibrant colors. It will also be more efficient with dark themes.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe Axon 40 Ultra provides smoother scrolling and animations, enhancing the user experience.
Brightness0 nits1500 nitsThe Axon 40 Ultra is much brighter, making it significantly more visible in direct sunlight.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)Qualcomm SM8450 Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 (4 nm)The Axon 40 Ultra has a dramatically more powerful processor, offering far superior speed and responsiveness for all tasks including gaming.
AnTuTu Score178,2201,061,300The Axon 40 Ultra will provide much faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 730The Axon 40 Ultra's GPU is significantly more powerful, resulting in much better graphics performance, particularly in gaming.
Camera
Rear Camera (Standard)48MP, f/1.764MP, f/1.6The Axon 40 Ultra has a higher resolution sensor and a wider aperture that will lead to better image quality and low light performance.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.016MP, f/2.0The Axon 40 Ultra has higher selfie camera resolution and should produce clearer selfies
Telephoto LensNone64MP, f/3.5The Axon 40 Ultra has a dedicated telephoto lens for optical zoom capabilities not available on the Moto G Power.
ToF 3D SensorNone0.3MPThe Axon 40 Ultra has a depth sensor that can help with portrait mode and other camera effects.
Portrait Mode (depth)2MP, f/2.4NoneThe Moto G Power uses this sensor for portrait mode instead of a dedicated telephoto camera.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneThe Moto G Power has a dedicated macro camera for close-up shots.
Wide Angle + MacroNone64MP, f/2.3The Axon 40 Ultra has an ultrawide and macro lens in one.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps8K@30fps, 4K@30/60/120fpsThe Axon 40 Ultra has significantly better video recording capabilities, supporting up to 8K resolution and higher frame rates.
StabilizationEISEIS + OISThe Axon 40 Ultra has better video stabilization with the addition of OIS for less shaky footage.
Slow MotionYes, 60 fpsYes, 480 fpsThe Axon 40 Ultra supports higher framerate slow-motion video recording.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life, although the Axon's more powerful chip could impact this in practice.
Charging15W65WThe Axon 40 Ultra charges much faster, allowing you to quickly top up the battery.
Charger in-box10WNoneThe Motorola includes a 10W charger while the Axon 40 Ultra does not include a charger.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 12The Axon 40 Ultra runs a newer version of Android, potentially getting longer software support and features.
Max Version13The Axon 40 Ultra is planned to get upgraded to android 13.
Connectivity
WiFi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/ac/axThe Axon 40 Ultra supports the newer WiFi 6 standard (802.11ax) which has faster speeds.
Bluetooth5.05.2The Axon 40 Ultra has a newer version of Bluetooth, offering more features and better energy efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo, GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1)The Axon 40 Ultra supports more satellite systems for improved location accuracy, especially in urban environments.
SIMSingle SIMDual SIMThe Axon 40 Ultra allows you to use two SIM cards simultaneously.
Storage
Internal32/64 GB128/256/512/1024 GBThe Axon 40 Ultra offers significantly more storage for photos, videos, and apps.
RAM3/4 GB8/12/16/18 GBThe Axon 40 Ultra has significantly more RAM, leading to smoother multitasking and performance in demanding apps.
ExpandableNoNoNeither phone has expandable storage.
Audio
QualityBasic audioDTS/DTS X, Stereo speakers, 3 MicrophonesThe Axon 40 Ultra offers a better audio experience with stereo speakers and higher quality microphones.
Security
FingerprintSide-mountedBasicBoth phones offer fingerprint sensor for security. The side-mounted sensor on the Motorola may be more convenient for some.
Sensors
MotionAccelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeAccelerometer, GyroscopeThe Axon 40 Ultra additionally features gravity and hall sensors for more advanced functionalities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Power (2021) Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Typically, the Moto G Power is much more affordable than the Axon 40 Ultra.
  • In-box Charger: The phone comes with a 10W charger.
  • Compass Sensor: The Moto G power has a compass sensor, missing from the Axon 40 Ultra.
  • Dedicated Macro Camera and Portrait Mode: The Moto G Power has these dedicated camera sensors, while the Axon 40 Ultra uses a dedicated ultrawide/macro sensor.
  • Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: This can be preferred by some users.

Practical Implications: The Moto G Power is a budget-friendly option that covers the basics, perfect for users who need a phone for day-to-day use without intensive tasks.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Advantages:

  • Superior Display: Larger AMOLED screen with much higher resolution, refresh rate, and brightness offering a better viewing experience.
  • Significantly Faster Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 1 is a flagship-level chipset providing far more power for all tasks, especially gaming and multitasking.
  • Advanced Camera System: Higher resolution sensors, dedicated telephoto lens, ultrawide, and 8K video recording capabilities leading to significantly better image quality and versatility.
  • Faster Charging: 65W fast charging significantly reduces charging times.
  • More Storage and RAM: Offers substantially more internal storage and RAM, which can improve performance and future-proof the phone.
  • Upgraded Software and Connectivity: Newer version of Android and supports faster WiFi and Bluetooth.
  • Better Audio: Comes with stereo speakers, DTS/DTS X, and higher quality microphones.
  • Dual SIM support: The Axon 40 Ultra supports the use of two SIM cards.

Practical Implications: The Axon 40 Ultra is a premium phone that offers a superior user experience in every area. It's ideal for users who prioritize performance, display quality, and camera capabilities.

Trade-offs:

  • The Axon 40 Ultra's significantly higher price is a trade-off for the improved performance and features. It also lacks an in-box charger.
  • The Moto G Power lacks in raw performance compared to the Axon, along with display quality and camera performance.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G Power (2021) Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Users who need a functional smartphone for basic tasks and don't want to spend much money.
  • Light Users: People who primarily use their phone for calls, texts, browsing, and social media, without demanding games or apps.
  • Users Prioritizing Battery Life over Performance: The phone is optimized for battery life over performance.
  • Users Who Prefer Physical Buttons: The fingerprint sensor is side-mounted

Use Cases:

  • Basic daily communication (calls, texts).
  • Casual web browsing and social media.
  • Playing less graphically intense games.
  • Long battery life for travel or emergencies.

ZTE Axon 40 Ultra Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Users who need top-tier performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Multimedia Enthusiasts: People who consume a lot of video, play mobile games, and want a superior viewing experience.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera with excellent image quality and advanced features.
  • Users Who Prioritize Performance: Users who prioritize performance above all else.
  • Professionals: Users who need a phone for content creation or business use, and who want the option for dual SIM.

Use Cases:

  • High-end mobile gaming with smooth frame rates.
  • Recording high-quality video content.
  • Multitasking between multiple apps.
  • Professional photography.
  • Business users using two sim cards.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Moto G Power provides great value for its very low price, offering decent functionality at a budget price point.
  • The Axon 40 Ultra provides a premium experience, but the cost is much higher. It delivers a lot of value if you can use it's advanced features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Ask:

  1. What is my budget? The Moto G Power is much cheaper.
  2. How do I use my phone? Do you need a basic phone or more processing power and camera capabilities?
  3. What features are most important to me? Do you prioritize display, performance, camera, or other features?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is a Primary Concern: Choose the Motorola Moto G Power (2021). It offers a functional experience for everyday use without breaking the bank.

  • Scenario 2: Performance and Camera Quality are Key: Choose the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. It's a powerful device that excels in all areas, especially for photography, gaming, and media consumption.

  • Scenario 3: A Balance of Price and Performance: If you need better performance than the Moto G Power, but are not willing to spend as much as the Axon 40 Ultra, consider looking for a different model within this price range.

My Choice

If I were to choose between these two phones, I would go with the ZTE Axon 40 Ultra. While the price difference is considerable, the Axon 40 Ultra offers a superior experience across the board. The significantly better display, vastly superior performance, much more advanced camera system, faster charging, and additional features make it the clear choice for me. I prioritize performance, display quality, and camera capabilities, and the Axon 40 Ultra is superior in all of these areas. I also think the faster charging speed is important to me. The Moto G Power is a decent budget phone, but it's simply outclassed by the Axon 40 Ultra in all performance related categories.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.