Motorola Moto G Power (2021) vs Sony Xperia 1 VI - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2021 2024

Physical

Volume 119.19 cm³ 98.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 206.5 g 192 g
Height 165.3 mm 162 mm
Width 75.9 mm 74 mm
Thickness 9.5 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar Silver
  • Flash Gray
  • Black
  • Platinum silver
  • Khaki green
  • Scar red

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.5 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 266 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.95 mAh/cm³ 50.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Video Output

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2021)Sony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 × 75.9 × 9.5 mm162 × 74 × 8.2 mmThe Sony is noticeably slimmer and slightly smaller, making it more pocketable and comfortable to hold for extended periods.
Weight206.5g192gThe Sony is lighter by 14.5g, which can be felt during extended use, making it less fatiguing.
Display
Size6.6"6.5"Both have similar screen sizes, with negligible difference
Resolution720x16001080x2340The Sony has a significantly sharper display with much more detail and clarity. Text and images are noticeably crisper.
Pixel Density266 ppi396 ppiThe Sony's higher pixel density results in a clearer and more refined visual experience.
TechnologyIPS LCDOLEDThe Sony's OLED display provides deeper blacks, richer colors, and better contrast than the Motorola's IPS LCD.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe Sony's 120Hz refresh rate makes scrolling and animations much smoother and more responsive.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness. The practical impact here is unknown as the value is 0.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)The Sony's high-end processor is vastly superior, leading to dramatically faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and significantly better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score178,2202,110,000The Sony's AnTuTu score is over 1000% higher, highlighting its massive performance advantage.
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 750The Sony's GPU provides superior graphics performance for demanding games and applications.
Camera
Standard Camera48MP, f/1.7, 0.80µm48MP, f/1.9, 1/1.4", 1.17µm, IMX888The Sony has a larger sensor and pixel size, likely resulting in better low-light performance and more detail.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.0, 1.12µm12MP, f/2.0, 1/2.93", 1.22µm, IMX663The Sony's higher resolution and larger sensor should result in better quality selfies.
Telephoto LensNone12MP, f/2.3, 1/3.5", 1.00µm, IMX650The Sony offers a telephoto lens for optical zoom, a feature completely absent on the Motorola.
Wide Angle LensNone12.2MP, f/2.2, 1/2.55", 1.40µm, IMX563The Sony includes a wide-angle lens, allowing for more versatile photography compared to the Motorola.
Portrait mode (depth)2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µmNoneThe Motorola includes a depth sensor, but the impact is less significant compared to what Sony offers with their additional lenses.
Macro lens2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µmNoneThe Motorola has a dedicated macro lens, but the low resolution means it's likely of limited use.
Video1080p@60fpsUp to 4K@120fpsThe Sony offers vastly superior video recording capabilities, including higher resolution, higher frame rates, and HDR support, while the Motorola's 1080p@60fps is more basic.
Video StabilizationEISOIS, EISThe Sony offers superior video stabilization with OIS, which helps with camera shake.
Battery
Capacity5000 mAh5000 mAhBoth have the same battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life.
Charging15W30WThe Sony charges much faster, reducing waiting times for a full charge.
Features10W charger includedBypass charging, reverse charging, reverse wireless chargingThe Sony offers more advanced charging features including reverse charging and bypass charging for gaming.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Power (2021) Advantages:

  • Lower Price: Significantly more affordable, making it accessible for budget-conscious users.
  • Macro Lens: Includes a macro lens for close-up photography, although its resolution is low.
  • Included Charger: Comes with a charger in the box.

Practical Implications:

  • The Motorola is a basic smartphone that fulfills the needs of a user with basic needs.

Sony Xperia 1 VI Advantages:

  • Superior Display: OLED panel with high resolution, high pixel density, and a 120Hz refresh rate for a much better visual experience.
  • Top-Tier Performance: High-end Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chip offering extremely fast performance for all tasks.
  • Advanced Camera System: Versatile triple-lens setup with telephoto and wide-angle lenses, larger sensors, better low light performance, and advanced video capabilities.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging is significantly quicker than 15W.
  • Advanced Features: Includes features like bypass charging, reverse charging, reverse wireless charging, and dual SIM with eSIM.
  • Superior connectivity: Newer Wifi standard with better features and more Bluetooth features
  • More Storage and RAM: Higher internal storage and RAM
  • Better Build Quality: Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 screen protection.

Practical Implications:

  • The Sony offers a flagship-level experience with exceptional display quality, top-tier performance, and advanced camera capabilities. It is a more premium device overall.
  • Its superior video capabilities, especially the 4K video recording, will be a great feature for vloggers and video creators.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Motorola has a much lower resolution display with a lower refresh rate. The performance is very slow, and its cameras are basic.
  • The Sony is noticeably more expensive and may not fit in a budget user's plan.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G Power (2021) Ideal User:

  • Budget-conscious users who need a basic smartphone for calls, texts, and light browsing.
  • Users who prioritize battery life over high performance and advanced features.
  • Those who value having a macro lens in a smartphone.

Use Cases:

  • Everyday communication, social media browsing, and basic app usage.
  • As a secondary phone for travel or emergencies.
  • Users who don't require intensive gaming or high-quality multimedia.

Sony Xperia 1 VI Ideal User:

  • Power users who demand top-tier performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications.
  • Photography and videography enthusiasts who want a high-quality and versatile camera system.
  • Users who value a premium display experience with high resolution, vibrant colors, and smooth animations.
  • Users who need advanced connectivity features like dual SIM with eSIM.

Use Cases:

  • Gaming, video editing, content creation, and heavy multitasking.
  • Capturing high-quality photos and videos, even in low-light conditions.
  • Watching movies and consuming media with a high-quality display experience.
  • Traveling and needing dual SIM and advanced connectivity.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Motorola provides basic functionality at a very low price.
  • The Sony provides a premium experience with advanced features at a much higher price.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? If cost is a primary concern, the Motorola is the better choice. The Sony is in a much higher price bracket.
  2. What are your performance needs? If you need a phone for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, the Sony is the clear winner. If your needs are basic, the Motorola is good enough.
  3. How important is the camera and display? If you value high-quality photos, videos, and a premium display experience, the Sony is far superior. If you are okay with basic cameras and display, Motorola will be good.

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget Shopper: If your budget is limited and you just need a basic phone, the Motorola is the more sensible option.
  • Scenario 2: Performance Seeker: If you demand top-tier performance, excellent camera capabilities, and a premium display, the Sony is the only choice.
  • Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast: The Sony's versatile camera system with telephoto and wide-angle lenses makes it ideal for users who take many pictures and videos.
  • Scenario 4: Basic User: If your main use is social media and some basic tasks, Motorola will suffice.
  • Scenario 5: Power User: If you require higher storage and RAM and use the phone for heavier tasks, Sony is the way to go.

My Choice

Given the massive differences in the features and specifications of these two phones, I would choose the Sony Xperia 1 VI.

Here's why:

  • Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers a performance jump that isn't just faster; it's a different league of performance. This matters for everything from app smoothness to future-proofing.
  • Display: The OLED panel with its higher resolution and 120Hz refresh rate is significantly better. The viewing experience is one of the most noticeable differences when using the phones.
  • Camera: The versatility offered by the additional lenses (telephoto and wide-angle) along with the bigger and higher-resolution sensors and better video capabilities will help me take much better photos and videos.
  • Connectivity: The newer Wifi standard and improved Bluetooth features will help me future-proof the device and give me a better wireless experience.
  • Overall Experience: The Sony provides a smooth and enjoyable premium feel, while the Motorola feels like a basic device.

While the cost difference is significant, the jump in performance, camera quality, display quality, and other premium features is too big to ignore for my use cases. I also value future-proofing my phone which the Sony does better. The Motorola is a budget phone, while the Sony is a premium flagship; the difference is noticeable.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.