Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Moto G Power (2021) vs. Samsung Galaxy A32
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G Power (2021) | Samsung Galaxy A32 | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 165.3 × 75.9 × 9.5 mm | 158.9 × 73.6 × 8.4 mm | Motorola is taller, wider, and thicker; Samsung is more pocketable and easier to handle |
| Weight | 206.5g | 184g | Samsung is significantly lighter, making it more comfortable for extended use. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.6" | 6.4" | Motorola has slightly larger screen, better for media consumption |
| Resolution | 720x1600 | 1080x2400 | Samsung has much sharper display, better for text and detail |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 266 | 411 | Samsung has noticeably sharper and clearer visuals due to higher pixel density |
| Technology | IPS LCD | AMOLED | Samsung offers superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors; better for media and dark mode users. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 90Hz | Samsung has smoother animations during scrolling and gaming |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 0 nits | Both have similar brightness levels, but the practical implication is not available due to missing data. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) | Mediatek Helio G80 (12 nm) | Different chipsets, both in the budget range. |
| AnTuTu Score | 178,220 | 200,458 | Samsung offers slightly better overall performance in benchmarks |
| GPU | Adreno 610 | Mali-G52 MC2 | Different GPUs, both suitable for casual gaming |
| Camera | |||
| Rear Camera (Main) | 48MP, f/1.7 | 64.2MP, f/1.8 | Samsung has higher resolution, Motorola has a slightly wider aperture |
| Front Camera | 8MP, f/2.0 | 20MP, f/2.2 | Samsung offers higher resolution, better detail for selfies |
| Wide-Angle Lens | None | 8MP, f/2.2 | Samsung has a wide angle lens for more versatile photos |
| Depth Sensor | 2MP, f/2.4 | 5MP, f/2.4 | Samsung captures more detailed portrait mode photos. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4 | 5MP, f/2.4 | Samsung captures more detailed macro photos |
| Video Recording | 1080p@30/60fps with EIS | 1080p@30fps | Motorola offers 60fps option and both feature EIS; Samsung has no slow motion video mode. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery life for both phones |
| Charging | 15W Fast Charging | Standard Charging | Motorola charges faster; Samsung's charging specs are not provided |
| Charger | 10W charger in-box | No info | Motorola provides a charger in the box, which is a plus for convenience. |
| Software | |||
| OS | Android 10 | Android 11 (upgradeable to 13) | Samsung is running a newer OS and is eligible for more updates |
| Connectivity | |||
| WiFi | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | 802.11a/b/g/n/ac | Both support modern wifi standards |
| Bluetooth | 5.0 LE | 5.0 | Samsung has a more comprehensive Bluetooth profile |
| GPS | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, Galileo | GPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, Galileo | Samsung uses more satellite systems for improved accuracy |
| SIM | Single SIM | Dual SIM | Samsung offers dual SIM functionality for flexibility |
| Storage | |||
| Internal | 32GB or 64GB | 64GB or 128GB | Samsung has 128GB storage as an option, better for those who need more space for files |
| RAM | 3GB or 4GB | 4GB, 6GB or 8GB | Samsung offers up to 8GB RAM, better for multitasking and gaming |
| Expandable Storage | No | No | No option for storage expansion in either phone. |
| Security | |||
| Fingerprint Sensor | Side-mounted | Basic sensor | Motorola features a more convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor. |
| Build Quality | |||
| Screen Protection | Unknown | Unknown | Both phones have unspecified screen protection |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Moto G Power (2021) Advantages:
- Larger Display: 6.6" screen is better for consuming media.
- Fast Charging: 15W charging means quicker recharge times.
- Side-Mounted Fingerprint Sensor: Considered more convenient by some users.
- Included Charger: 10W charger in-box adds convenience.
Samsung Galaxy A32 Advantages:
- Superior Display: AMOLED display with higher resolution and refresh rate provides a much better visual experience.
- Higher Performance: A slightly better processor and GPU.
- Better Cameras: Higher resolution main, selfie, and additional wide-angle and macro lenses offer versatility and detail.
- More RAM and Storage Options: Up to 8GB RAM and 128GB storage.
- Newer OS: Android 11, with guaranteed updates through Android 13
- Dual SIM Support: Use two SIM cards simultaneously.
- More Comprehensive Bluetooth profile: Supports more features and profiles for enhanced connectivity.
Trade-offs:
- Motorola's larger screen comes with a lower resolution and IPS LCD panel, while Samsung offers a superior display but is smaller.
- Motorola has faster charging but no advantage in camera or display quality.
- Samsung lacks fast charging specifications (standard charging)
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola Moto G Power (2021) Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize battery life and a larger screen.
- Budget-conscious buyers looking for a reliable daily driver.
- Users who prefer a convenient side-mounted fingerprint sensor.
- Individuals who want fast charging, with the convenience of an included charger.
Use Cases:
- Extensive media consumption (videos, browsing)
- Long periods away from power outlets.
- Basic gaming and social media usage.
Samsung Galaxy A32 Ideal User:
- Users who prioritize a high-quality display for media consumption and photography.
- Individuals who take a lot of pictures and want versatile camera capabilities.
- Users who need more storage and RAM for multitasking and apps.
- Those who value a modern operating system and software updates.
- Users who need dual SIM functionality.
Use Cases:
- High-quality photography and videography.
- Mobile gaming.
- Frequent multitasking and app usage.
- Users who prefer the visual quality of AMOLED displays.
- International travelers who need dual SIM support.
Price-to-Value Ratio:
- The Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is generally the more budget-friendly option, making it a good value for basic users.
- The Samsung Galaxy A32 offers a better user experience in key areas like display and camera, making it worthwhile for users willing to spend a bit more.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- Display Quality: How important is a high-resolution, vibrant AMOLED display vs a larger but less detailed IPS LCD?
- Camera Needs: Do you need a versatile camera system with multiple lenses, or will a basic single-lens setup suffice?
- Performance & Software: How much do you value the latest Android version, more RAM, and more storage space vs reliable performance?
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User:
- If budget is a primary concern and you just want a reliable smartphone with long battery life, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is sufficient.
- Scenario 2: Media Enthusiast:
- If you prioritize display quality, media consumption, and taking photos, the Samsung Galaxy A32 is the superior choice with its AMOLED display and versatile camera system.
- Scenario 3: Photography Enthusiast
- If photography is your main priority, then the Samsung Galaxy A32 is the better option because of the multiple lenses and higher resolution on both front and back camera sensors.
My Choice
If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Samsung Galaxy A32. Here's why:
- Superior Display: The AMOLED screen with its higher resolution and refresh rate is a significant advantage for everyday use. The visual experience is much more enjoyable, whether I'm browsing the web, watching videos, or playing games.
- Better Camera System: As someone who takes photos regularly, the versatility of having a wide-angle and macro lens, along with higher resolution sensors, is a feature I value.
- More RAM and Storage: The higher RAM and storage capacity provide a smoother experience, which would keep the phone running better for a longer period.
- Software Advantage: The newer version of Android (and guaranteed updates) means that it will have better software support for longer.
While the Motorola's larger screen and faster charging are appealing, the overall user experience offered by the Galaxy A32 is superior, particularly regarding display quality and camera versatility. For me, these differences justify the higher cost.
