Motorola Moto G Power (2021) vs Nokia XR20 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification
Nokia XR20
Nokia XR20
Nokia

General

Launch Date January 14, 2021 August 4, 2021
Release Year 2021 2021

Physical

Volume 119.19 cm³ 148.25 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.2 "/g 2.69 "/g
Weight 206.5 g 248 g
Height 165.3 mm 171.6 mm
Width 75.9 mm 81.5 mm
Thickness 9.5 mm 10.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Polar Silver
  • Flash Gray
  • Ultra Blue
  • Granite Gray

Display

Screen Size 6.6 " 6.67 "
Resolution 720 x 1600 1080 x 2400
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 83.8 % 76.8 %
Pixel Density 266 PPI 395 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A 550 nits
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 114.78 mAh/in² 104.07 mAh/in²
Battery Density 41.95 mAh/cm³ 31.23 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 4630 mAh
NFC Support No Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM6115 Snapdragon 662 (11 nm) Qualcomm SM4350 Snapdragon 480 5G (8 nm)
CPU Octa-core (4x2.0 GHz Kryo 260 Gold & 4x1.8 GHz Kryo 260 Silver) Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Kryo 460 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 460)
GPU Adreno 610 Adreno 619

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 11
Maximum OS Version 13

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G Power (2021)Nokia XR20Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions165.3 x 75.9 x 9.5 mm171.6 x 81.5 x 10.6 mmNokia XR20 is noticeably larger and bulkier, may be less comfortable for smaller hands or pockets
Weight206.5g248gMotorola is significantly lighter, easier to handle for longer periods; Nokia is heavier due to its rugged build.
Display
Size6.6"6.67"Negligible size difference in practice; both are large for comfortable media consumption.
Resolution720x16001080x2400Nokia XR20 has a much sharper display; text and images will appear clearer, noticeable especially with reading and media playback.
Pixel Density (PPI)266395Nokia XR20's display is much sharper, leading to higher quality images.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDNo difference in display technology; both offer decent color reproduction and viewing angles, but not OLED quality
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth offer a standard 60Hz refresh rate; neither has a smoother scrolling experience offered by higher refresh rates.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBrightness is not specified and cannot be compared, impacting outdoor readability.
Performance
ChipsetSnapdragon 662 (11nm)Snapdragon 480 5G (8nm)Nokia XR20’s chipset is newer and more powerful, providing smoother multitasking and faster app loading; Better for games.
AnTuTu Score178,220320,000Nokia XR20 is significantly faster in performance and suitable for demanding tasks and gaming
GPUAdreno 610Adreno 619Nokia XR20’s GPU is superior, resulting in better graphics performance for gaming and other demanding tasks.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh4630mAhMotorola has a slightly larger battery but the difference is not significant.
Charging15W fast charging18W fast chargingNokia XR20 charges slightly faster; may have marginal charging speed.
Features10W charger in-box, Non-removable15W wireless charging, Non-removableMotorola has a basic charger included; Nokia offers wireless charging convenience.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.748MP, f/1.8Motorola has a slightly wider aperture, potentially performing slightly better in low light conditions but generally performance is similar.
Selfie Camera8MP, f/2.08MP, f/2.0Identical selfie camera specs on both phones, with similar performance expected.
Wide Angle LensNone13MP, f/2.4Nokia XR20 has a wide-angle lens; capturing broader scenes.
Portrait Mode2MP, f/2.4NoneMotorola has a dedicated depth sensor for portrait photography; improving background blur accuracy.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneMotorola has a dedicated macro lens; taking close-up shots of small objects.
Video Recording1080p@30/60fps w/ EIS1080p@30fpsMotorola has an edge with 1080p@60fps recording, resulting in smoother video capture. Nokia does not support slow-motion.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 11, upgradable to 13Nokia XR20 has a newer OS and two future OS upgrades; it has more up-to-date features and security.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11ac802.11ax (Wi-Fi 6)Nokia XR20 supports Wi-Fi 6, offering faster speeds, lower latency and better performance in congested networks
Bluetooth5.0 LE5.0 LEBoth offer similar Bluetooth connectivity; Nokia XR20 has better audio codec support.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, QZSS, Galileo, NavIC SystemNokia XR20 has more satellite systems; resulting in better location accuracy and precision.
SIMSingle SIM (Nano)Dual SIM Dual Standby (Nano)Nokia XR20 offers dual SIM capabilities; allowing to manage multiple phone numbers easily.
Storage
Internal32/64GB64/128GBNokia XR20 has more storage, especially useful for users with large libraries of media and apps.
RAM3/4GB4/6GBNokia XR20 has a maximum 6GB of RAM; smoother multitasking and improved app management.
ExpandableNoNoNeither supports external storage; user must choose internal storage carefully.
Audio
QualityBasic AudioStereo Speakers, 2 microphonesNokia XR20 has better audio features; louder and clearer sound.
Security
FeaturesSide-mounted fingerprintSide-mounted fingerprintSimilar biometric security is provided in both devices.
Build Quality
ProtectionUnknownCorning Gorilla Glass VictusNokia XR20 has a much more durable screen; better scratch and shatter resistance.
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, BarometerNokia XR20 has a Barometer; offering environmental data for outdoor activities.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G Power (2021) Advantages:

  • Lighter and more compact: Significantly lighter and slightly smaller, making it more comfortable for extended use and easier to handle.
  • Larger battery: Slightly larger battery capacity which may translate to marginally longer battery life for some users.
  • Dedicated macro and depth cameras: Offers a macro lens for close-up shots and a depth sensor for better portrait mode; This can be useful for users interested in photography.
  • Lower Price: Generally available at a lower price point

Practical Implications:

  • More comfortable for prolonged use due to its lighter build.
  • Offers versatility in photography with its depth and macro lenses.
  • Potentially longer battery life for some users.

Nokia XR20 Advantages:

  • Superior display: Higher resolution and pixel density resulting in significantly sharper visuals and better viewing experience.
  • Faster performance: More powerful processor and GPU; providing smoother performance and better gaming capabilities.
  • Better build quality: Features Corning Gorilla Glass Victus; greater resistance to scratches and drops.
  • 5G Connectivity: Faster download and upload speeds, lower latency.
  • Wireless charging: Supports convenient 15W wireless charging.
  • Stereo speakers: Offers a superior audio experience; good for media consumption.
  • Longer software support: Offers newer OS and two major version upgrades.
  • Wider camera lens: Provides wide-angle lens for capturing landscape.
  • Better connectivity: Wi-Fi 6, better GPS support, dual sim

Practical Implications:

  • A more premium and durable build, resulting in less risk of screen damage.
  • Improved overall performance; running apps and games smoother.
  • Future-proof due to 5G and software updates.
  • Better audio experience, convenient charging, improved photography.

Trade-offs:

  • The Nokia XR20 is heavier and bulkier due to its rugged design which may not be ideal for all users.
  • The Motorola Moto G Power sacrifices some processing power and display quality in favor of a lower price and lighter build.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G Power (2021):

  • Ideal User: Budget-conscious users who prioritize battery life and comfort. Suitable for those who need a reliable daily driver for basic tasks like browsing, social media, and casual photography.
  • Use Cases:
    • Users who frequently consume media, browse the web and use social media and need a large screen.
    • Users who need a long-lasting phone for everyday use, without high-end performance requirements.
    • Casual photographers who want a basic camera with dedicated macro and depth sensors.
  • Price-to-Value: Good value for basic functionality; great battery life at a budget price.

Nokia XR20:

  • Ideal User: Users who need a durable, high-performing phone that can withstand more rugged conditions; prioritize performance, camera quality, and longevity; also, users who value security and software updates.
  • Use Cases:
    • Outdoor enthusiasts or individuals in demanding professions who need a durable and rugged device.
    • Users who prioritize performance and smooth multitasking for daily usage.
    • Users who often take photos and need wide-angle lens with better quality.
    • Users who rely on up-to-date software and security features
    • Users who value modern connectivity options.
  • Price-to-Value: Higher price but delivers a premium experience with better display, performance, durability, 5G and other features.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions to Consider:

  1. Budget: What's the price range? Is saving money a priority?
  2. Durability: How important is ruggedness and resistance to drops and scratches?
  3. Performance: Is high-end performance and smooth multitasking crucial, or are basic functions sufficient?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget-Conscious User - If budget is the main priority, the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is more affordable and offers a long battery life.
  • Scenario 2: Rugged Use: For users who need a highly durable phone for outdoor activities or demanding work conditions, the Nokia XR20 is the better choice.
  • Scenario 3: Performance & Future-Proofing: For users who value performance, better display, software updates and 5G connectivity, the Nokia XR20 is the superior option.
  • Scenario 4: Everyday Use: For a general user who wants a reliable phone for daily tasks, both can suffice but the Nokia provides a more premium experience.

My Choice

If I had to choose between these two phones, I would choose the Nokia XR20.

Here's why:

  • Future-Proofing: The Nokia XR20 offers 5G connectivity, a more powerful processor, and guaranteed software updates to Android 13. This ensures that the phone will remain relevant and functional for longer.
  • Display Quality: The higher resolution display on the Nokia XR20 significantly improves the user experience, making text and images noticeably sharper.
  • Durability: The Gorilla Glass Victus screen is a critical advantage for a phone I would be using daily. It would give me more peace of mind regarding drops and scratches, leading to the phone lasting longer.
  • Overall Performance: The Snapdragon 480 5G coupled with 6GB RAM provides a more responsive experience for everyday tasks.
  • Better Features: The addition of stereo speakers, dual sim, better GPS and wireless charging make it a more well-rounded device.

While the Motorola Moto G Power (2021) is cheaper and lighter, and it has a slightly larger battery and dedicated macro and depth sensors, the Nokia XR20 wins out with its superior display, performance, durability, better connectivity, and overall software experience. These advantages would justify the higher price tag.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.