Motorola Moto G 5G vs ZTE Blade A75 4G - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 July 1, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 106.97 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.49 "/g
Weight 212 g 189 g
Height 166.1 mm 164.1 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.8 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.6 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Basalt Black
  • Aqua Green
  • Marble White

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1612
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 84.1 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 90 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 46.74 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Unisoc T606 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (2x1.6 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.6 GHz Cortex-A55)
GPU Adreno 619 Mali-G57 MP1

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 13
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GZTE Blade A75 4GPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm164.1 × 75.8 × 8.6 mmMoto G 5G is slightly larger and thicker, may feel bulkier in hand; A75 4G is slimmer and lighter, potentially more comfortable.
Weight212g189gA75 4G is noticeably lighter, which is more comfortable for extended use.
Display
Size6.7"6.6"Moto G 5G has a marginally larger display, potentially better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x2400720x1612Moto G 5G offers a significantly sharper display, resulting in clearer text and images.
Pixel Density (PPI)393267Moto G 5G provides a much sharper and detailed image.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDBoth offer similar color reproduction and viewing angles, typical for LCD displays.
Refresh Rate60Hz90HzA75 4G has a smoother scrolling experience compared to the Moto G 5G, with more fluid transitions.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsPeak brightness is unknown for both phones.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8 nm)Unisoc T606 (12 nm)Moto G 5G's chipset offers significantly better performance for demanding apps and gaming.
AnTuTu Score390,000240,000Moto G 5G delivers much smoother performance in multitasking and graphically intensive applications.
GPUAdreno 619Mali-G57 MP1Moto G 5G has a more powerful GPU, better suited for gaming and graphics-intensive applications.
Camera
Main Camera48MP, f/1.750MP, f/1.8A75 4G has a slightly higher resolution, but the Moto G 5G's wider aperture might offer better low-light performance.
Selfie Camera16MP, f/2.28MPMoto G 5G's selfie camera will likely capture more detailed photos.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2NoneMoto G 5G offers an additional wide-angle lens for landscape shots and group photos.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4NoneMoto G 5G allows for close-up macro shots.
Video Recording4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps with EIS1080p@30fps with EISMoto G 5G can record higher-resolution videos with image stabilization, offering more versatility.
Camera FeaturesTriple camera, LAF, RAW, Night ModeDual cameraMoto G 5G has more advanced photography features such as Night Mode and RAW capture, along with a triple camera setup.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth phones have a similar battery capacity, offering comparable battery life.
Charging20W Fast Charging22.5W Fast ChargingA75 4G charges slightly faster, reducing downtime.
Battery TypeLi-IonLi-PolymerBoth have non-removable batteries.
Software
OSAndroid 10Android 13A75 4G has a newer OS, which might offer better features, security updates, and a more modern user experience.
Connectivity
Wi-Fi802.11a/b/g/n/ac802.11a/b/g/n/acBoth have similar Wi-Fi standards, offering dual-band support and other typical features.
Bluetooth5.15.0Moto G 5G has a slightly newer Bluetooth standard, potentially offering better connectivity and efficiency.
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoA75 4G supports more satellite systems, leading to more accurate location tracking.
SIMDual SIM Dual StandbyDual SIM Dual StandbyBoth offer dual SIM functionality.
Storage
Internal64 GB or 128 GB128 GB or 256 GBA75 4G has a higher storage capacity option, allowing users to store more files and apps, while the Moto G 5G has a 64GB base configuration.
RAM4 GB or 6 GB4 GB or 8 GBA75 4G has more RAM on its higher configuration, better for multitasking.
ExpandableNoNoNeither device supports microSD card expansion.
Audio
Audio Quality2 microphonesDTS / DTS XZTE's audio enhancements aim for improved surround sound experiences while Moto G offers dual microphones for improved audio recording
Security
Featuresrear-mounted fingerprint sensorside-mounted fingerprint sensorA75 4G's side-mounted fingerprint sensor tends to be more ergonomic and faster, depending on user preference.
Build Quality
Screen ProtectionUnknownUnknownScreen protection is unknown for both phones.
Sensors
FeaturesAccelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintAccelerometer, Gyroscope, Proximity, FingerprintMoto G 5G has a compass, which can be helpful for navigation.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset and Adreno 619 GPU provide significantly better performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps compared to the Unisoc T606 and Mali-G57 MP1 in the ZTE.
  • Higher Resolution Display: The 1080x2400 display offers significantly sharper and more detailed visuals, which is better for reading, browsing, and watching media.
  • Better Cameras: Offers a 16MP front camera for better selfies, plus additional wide-angle and macro lenses for greater shooting versatility. It also captures video at up to 4K resolution.
  • More Camera Features: Comes with features like RAW capture and night mode
  • More Sensors: Includes a compass sensor
  • Newer Bluetooth: Uses Bluetooth 5.1 LE

ZTE Blade A75 4G Advantages:

  • Newer Android OS: Ships with Android 13, offering a more updated user experience with security updates and potentially better battery optimization.
  • Smoother Display: The 90Hz refresh rate provides a smoother and more responsive feel during scrolling and transitions.
  • Larger Storage Option: Offers up to 256 GB of storage.
  • Faster Charging: Supports 22.5W fast charging, slightly faster than the Moto G 5G.
  • More Ram: Offers 8GB of Ram
  • Slightly Lighter Build: Weighs 23 grams less than the Motorola Moto G 5G
  • More GPS Support: supports more satellite systems

Trade-offs:

  • The Moto G 5G sacrifices a smoother refresh rate and newer OS for significant performance and a better camera setup.
  • The ZTE Blade A75 4G provides a more up-to-date Android experience and a smoother display, but it comes with a significant performance drop compared to the Moto G 5G.
  • The Moto G 5G has a smaller base storage option of 64GB

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G:

  • Ideal User: Users who prioritize performance for gaming and multitasking, also those who value a high-quality display and versatile camera system.
  • Use Cases:
    • Mobile gamers who need a smooth experience.
    • Users who consume a lot of media and demand a crisp display.
    • Photo enthusiasts who want a flexible camera system.
    • Those who like a faster processor for opening apps and general navigation

ZTE Blade A75 4G:

  • Ideal User: Users who want a phone with a modern Android OS and a smoother display experience without needing high-end performance.
  • Use Cases:
    • Users who prioritize day-to-day tasks, like browsing, social media, and calling.
    • Individuals who prefer a more recent version of Android OS.
    • Users who appreciate a smoother screen for general navigation and reading.
    • Those who prefer a slightly lighter phone

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Moto G 5G is targeted at a user who values performance and display quality.
  • The ZTE Blade A75 4G aims for a user who prefers up-to-date software and smooth scrolling on a budget.
  • The price will be key to determining value.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. Performance vs. Software: Do you need a phone for demanding tasks and gaming, or is a smoother display and newer OS more important?
  2. Camera Quality: Are versatile camera features and high-resolution video recording crucial for you, or is a simple camera sufficient?
  3. Display Sharpness: How important is display clarity and detail?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1 (Performance Focus): If you game, multitask, or use demanding apps, the Motorola Moto G 5G is the better choice due to its superior chipset and GPU.
  • Scenario 2 (Software and Smoothness Focus): If you prioritize a modern Android experience and smooth scrolling, the ZTE Blade A75 4G is more appropriate.
  • Scenario 3 (Balanced Use): If you want a combination of decent performance, a good camera, and don't need high-end graphics, and prefer more storage, the ZTE Blade A75 4G might be a better choice. The lack of a high resolution screen would be an issue for some.

My Choice

If I had to choose, I would pick the Motorola Moto G 5G. The primary reason is the significant performance advantage offered by the Snapdragon 750G chipset. As someone who uses a phone for a variety of tasks, including app testing, browsing, photography, and light gaming, the better processing power and GPU are more important than the slightly smoother display of the Blade A75 4G. While the newer Android OS and larger storage on the ZTE are appealing, the performance difference is too great to ignore. The better camera system, with its higher resolution selfie camera and added functionality, also contributes to this decision. Therefore, the Moto G 5G offers a more well-rounded and capable experience.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.