Motorola Moto G 5G vs Tecno Spark Go 2023 - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 January 24, 2023
Release Year 2020 2023

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 110.13 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g N/A
Weight 212 g 0 g
Height 166.1 mm 163.9 mm
Width 76.1 mm 75.5 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.9 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Nebula Purple
  • Endless Black
  • Uyuni Blue
  • Skin Orange

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.6 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 720 x 1600
Aspect Ratio 20:9 20:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 85 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 267 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A N/A
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 114.78 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 45.4 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes No
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Mediatek MT6761 Helio A22 (12 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Quad-core 2.0 GHz Cortex-A53
GPU Adreno 619 PowerVR GE8320

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 2.0
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 2.0, OTG

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 12
Maximum OS Version

Comparison Summary

Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Moto G 5G vs. Tecno Spark Go 2023

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GTecno Spark Go 2023Practical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm163.9 × 75.5 × 8.9 mmMotorola is slightly taller and thicker, might feel bulkier. Tecno is slimmer and more pocketable.
Weight212g0g (Likely an error)Motorola is likely heavier, impacting long-term comfort; Tecno's weight is incorrectly stated as 0g; likely much lighter than Motorola.
Display
Size6.7"6.6"Motorola offers a slightly larger viewing area, better for media consumption.
Resolution1080x2400720x1600Motorola offers sharper text, images and videos due to significantly higher resolution.
Pixel Density (PPI)393267Motorola's display appears clearer and less pixelated.
TechnologyIPS LCDIPS LCDSimilar display tech; color reproduction is likely comparable.
Refresh Rate60Hz60HzBoth have standard 60Hz refresh, so the smoothness will be comparable in everyday use.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsThe screen brightness appears to be unstated for both; this can hinder outdoor visibility
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm)MediaTek Helio A22 (12 nm)Motorola’s chip offers much faster performance for gaming and demanding apps.
AnTuTu Score390,00092,140Motorola will load apps quicker and handle multitasking much better.
GPUAdreno 619PowerVR GE8320Motorola offers better graphics, leading to better gaming performance.
Camera
Rear Camera Resolution48MP (f/1.7)13MP (f/1.85)Motorola captures more detail, especially in low light, due to the higher resolution sensor and wider aperture.
Front Camera Resolution16MP (f/2.2)5MP (f/2.0)Motorola takes much higher quality selfies, with more detail and clarity.
Wide Angle Lens8MP (f/2.2)NoneMotorola offers versatile shooting options with a wide angle camera; the Tecno does not.
Macro Lens2MP (f/2.4)NoneMotorola captures close-up details with a dedicated macro lens; the Tecno does not.
Video RecordingUp to 4K@30fps w/ EISUp to 1080p@30fpsMotorola captures higher resolution videos with Electronic Image Stabilization.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have similar battery life; real life results depend on usage patterns.
Charging20W Fast Charging10W Fast ChargingMotorola charges faster, reducing downtime waiting.
Battery TypeLi-IonLi-Ion PolymerThese are two different battery chemistries, but performance implications are minor.
Software & Connectivity
OSAndroid 10Android 12Tecno has a more up-to-date operating system out of the box.
Wi-Fi802.11 a/b/g/n/ac802.11 b/g/nMotorola supports faster Wi-Fi standards, allowing for better internet speeds on compatible networks.
Bluetooth5.1 LE4.2 LEMotorola has more efficient and up-to-date bluetooth standards for device connectivity
GPSGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, SUPL, GalileoGPS, A-GPS, GLONASS, Beidou, GalileoBoth have good GPS; Tecno has additional Beidou support, which may improve coverage in some areas.
Storage
Internal Storage64GB or 128GB64GBMotorola has the option for more built-in storage for apps and files.
RAM4GB or 6GB3GBMotorola’s RAM options offer better multitasking performance.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither phone supports expandable storage which may limit users with extensive files.
Audio
Audio Quality2 microphonesBasic audio featuresMotorola offers better voice capture for calls and recordings due to the inclusion of dual microphones
Security
SecurityRear-mounted fingerprint sensorRear-mounted fingerprint sensorBoth offer basic biometric security with rear-mounted fingerprint sensors
Sensors
SensorsFingerprint, Proximity, Accelerometer, Compass, GyroscopeFingerprint, Proximity, AccelerometerMotorola offers comprehensive sensor suites which is useful for gaming and advanced features

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Significantly Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 750G chipset is much more powerful than the Helio A22, leading to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and better gaming.
  • Higher Quality Display: The FHD+ resolution and higher pixel density make the display noticeably sharper and more pleasant to use.
  • Superior Camera System: The 48MP main camera, along with the wide-angle and macro lenses, provides much more versatility and image quality than the Tecno's 13MP single camera. The front 16MP is also considerably better for selfies.
  • Faster Charging: 20W charging reduces charging times significantly compared to the Tecno's 10W.
  • More RAM options: Motorola offers both 4GB and 6GB of RAM whereas Tecno only has 3GB.
  • Better Audio: Motorola's dual microphone array allows for better voice capture.
  • Advanced Sensors: Motorola's inclusion of the compass and gyroscope provides features that Tecno cannot utilize.

Tecno Spark Go 2023 Advantages:

  • More Recent Software: Comes with Android 12 out of the box, offering a more up-to-date experience and likely extended software support.
  • Potentially Lighter (Likely): The stated 0g is likely a typo. In practice, the Tecno is likely noticeably lighter.
  • Slightly More Compact: A bit shorter and thinner, making it potentially more pocketable.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • Performance vs. Software: The Motorola offers significantly better performance, while the Tecno offers a more up-to-date Android version.
  • Camera Versatility vs. Price: The Motorola’s camera is more versatile but may contribute to a higher cost.
  • Screen Clarity vs Size: Motorola has a much clearer screen (with higher resolution and PPI) but a negligibly bigger size.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G is Ideal For:

  • Users who value Performance: Gamers, frequent app users, and those who need smooth multitasking.
  • Photography Enthusiasts: Users who prioritize camera quality, versatility and image quality, capturing memories with detail.
  • Media Consumers: Users who enjoy watching videos, movies, and playing games on their phones and will value higher resolution.
  • Users who value future proofing: The more capable chip set and camera will keep the phone capable for longer.

Use Cases:

  • Gaming: High frame rates and graphics quality in popular mobile games.
  • Photography: Capturing detailed photos and videos in various lighting conditions.
  • Content Creation: Editing videos and photos on the go with a phone that can handle the load.

Tecno Spark Go 2023 is Ideal For:

  • Budget-Conscious Buyers: Users who need a basic smartphone for essential tasks at a lower price point.
  • Casual Users: Users who mainly use their phone for calls, texts, and light browsing.
  • Users Prioritizing Software: Users who want a more up-to-date version of Android.

Use Cases:

  • Basic communication and social media browsing.
  • Light use applications for daily tasks like budgeting.
  • Simple media consumption like music and podcasts

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. How important is performance for you? (High performance vs Basic performance).
  2. How much do you value camera quality and versatility? (Multiple lenses and high quality vs. a basic camera).
  3. Is having the latest version of Android crucial? (Up-to-date software vs. capable hardware).

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Budget is a major concern.
    • Recommendation: Tecno Spark Go 2023 is better for basic users who are not performance focused.
  • Scenario 2: Performance, Camera, and Screen Quality are Crucial.
    • Recommendation: The Motorola Moto G 5G is the better choice due to its powerful chipset, advanced camera, and superior display resolution, albeit for a higher price.
  • Scenario 3: Software experience matters most.
    • Recommendation: The Tecno Spark Go 2023 is better due to its more up-to-date version of Android.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would choose the Motorola Moto G 5G. While the Tecno Spark Go 2023 is more recent and runs a newer version of Android, the performance gap is simply too large to ignore. The Snapdragon 750G offers a vastly superior experience in every aspect, from everyday app usage to gaming. Additionally, the camera system on the Motorola is significantly more capable and versatile, allowing for better photos and videos. While the outdated Android version is a drawback, the overall performance benefits and more versatile camera would outweigh the disadvantages. The user experience would be much more rewarding with the Moto G 5G due to its superior processor and screen.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.