Motorola Moto G 5G vs Sony Xperia 1 VI - Detailed Phone Comparison

Detailed Comparison

Specification

General

Launch Date December 7, 2020 June 3, 2024
Release Year 2020 2024

Physical

Volume 125.14 cm³ 98.3 cm³
Screen Size to Weight Ratio 3.16 "/g 3.39 "/g
Weight 212 g 192 g
Height 166.1 mm 162 mm
Width 76.1 mm 74 mm
Thickness 9.9 mm 8.2 mm
Foldable Design No No
Available Colors
  • Frosted Silver
  • Volcanic Gray
  • Black
  • Platinum silver
  • Khaki green
  • Scar red

Display

Screen Size 6.7 " 6.5 "
Resolution 1080 x 2400 1080 x 2340
Aspect Ratio 20:9 19.5:9
Screen-to-Body Ratio 85.7 % 86.5 %
Pixel Density 393 PPI 396 PPI
Refresh Rate N/A 120 Hz
Typical Brightness N/A N/A
HBM Brightness N/A N/A
Peak Brightness N/A N/A

Hardware

Battery Capacity per Screen Area 111.38 mAh/in² 118.34 mAh/in²
Battery Density 39.96 mAh/cm³ 50.86 mAh/cm³
Battery Capacity 5000 mAh 5000 mAh
NFC Support Yes Yes
Chipset Qualcomm SM7225 Snapdragon 750G 5G (8 nm) Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm)
CPU Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 570 & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 570) Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520)
GPU Adreno 619 Adreno 750

Connectivity

USB Version 2.0 3.2
OTG Support 1
DisplayPort
DisplayPort Version N/A N/A
USB Features USB Type-C 2.0 USB Type-C 3.2, OTG, Video Output

Software

Operating System Android Android
Initial OS Version 10 14
Maximum OS Version 17

Comparison Summary

1. Specifications Comparison

FeatureMotorola Moto G 5GSony Xperia 1 VIPractical Impact
Design
Dimensions166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm162 × 74 × 8.2 mmThe Sony Xperia 1 VI is more compact and thinner, making it easier to handle and pocket. The Motorola Moto G 5G is bulkier.
Weight212g192gThe Sony Xperia 1 VI is noticeably lighter, improving comfort during prolonged use.
Display
Size6.7"6.5"The Motorola has a slightly larger screen for those who prefer bigger displays for media consumption or gaming.
Resolution1080x24001080x2340Both have similar resolutions, providing adequate sharpness for everyday use. Differences are not noticeable to the human eye.
Pixel Density393 PPI396 PPIBoth offer similar levels of sharpness, differences are negligible
TechnologyIPS LCDOLEDThe Sony's OLED display provides superior contrast, deeper blacks, and more vibrant colors, enhancing the viewing experience.
Refresh Rate60Hz120HzThe Sony's 120Hz refresh rate results in noticeably smoother scrolling, animations, and overall responsiveness.
Brightness0 nits0 nitsBoth have identical peak brightness at 0 nits, making it impossible to evaluate outdoor visibility.
Performance
ChipsetQualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8nm)Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm)The Sony's flagship chipset offers significantly faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and much better gaming performance.
AnTuTu Score390,0002,110,000The Sony is substantially faster and more future-proof. The performance difference is very significant.
GPUAdreno 619Adreno 750The Sony has a much more powerful GPU, leading to better graphics rendering in games and demanding apps.
Camera
Rear Main Camera48MP, f/1.7, 0.8µm48MP, f/1.9, 1.17µm, 1/1.4" sensor (Sony IMX888)The Sony has a larger sensor, which generally translates to better low-light performance, despite the slightly narrower aperture.
Front Camera16MP, f/2.2, 1.0µm12MP, f/2.0, 1.22µm, 1/2.93" sensor (Sony IMX663)While the Motorola has a higher megapixel count for the selfie camera, Sony's larger sensor size, wider aperture, and newer sensor will often translate into higher-quality selfies in various lighting conditions.
Telephoto LensNone12MP, f/2.3, 1.0µm, 1/3.5" sensor (Sony IMX650)The Sony offers versatile zoom capabilities, which the Motorola lacks, allowing for better composition of distant subjects.
Wide Angle Lens8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm12.2MP, f/2.2, 1.40µm, 1/2.55" sensor (Sony IMX563)Sony has a higher resolution and larger sensor, potentially better quality photos with a wider field of view.
Macro Lens2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µmNoneThe Motorola can capture close-up macro shots, which Sony cannot.
Video4K@30fps, EISUp to 4K@120fps, HDR, OIS, EISThe Sony provides far superior video capabilities with higher frame rates, HDR, and optical image stabilization (OIS) for smoother, more professional-looking videos.
Battery
Capacity5000mAh5000mAhBoth have the same capacity, suggesting similar battery life. Actual battery life depends on usage patterns.
Charging20W Fast Charging30W Fast ChargingThe Sony charges faster, reducing downtime.
FeaturesNon-removableBypass Charging, Reverse charging, Reverse wireless chargingThe Sony offers more advanced battery features including bypass charging, reverse charging, and wireless reverse charging.
Other
Operating SystemAndroid 10Android 14The Sony has a much newer version of Android, offering the latest features, security updates, and a more modern experience.
WiFi802.11acWiFi 7 (802.11be)The Sony supports newer Wi-Fi standards, ensuring faster and more stable wireless connections.
Bluetooth5.15.4The Sony has a newer version of Bluetooth with improved connectivity and features.
Internal Storage64/128 GB256/512 GBSony offers significantly more storage for apps, photos, videos, and other data.
RAM4/6 GB12 GBThe Sony has far more RAM for better multitasking, smoother app performance, and overall responsiveness.
Expandable StorageNoNoNeither device supports storage expansion.

2. Key Differences Analysis

Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:

  • Macro Lens: The inclusion of a dedicated macro lens allows for detailed close-up photography, which the Sony lacks.
  • Potentially Lower Price: As an older, mid-range phone, the Moto G 5G is likely available at a lower price point.
  • Laser Autofocus (LAF): LAF can provide slightly faster and more accurate focus in certain scenarios, compared to PDAF alone.

Practical Implications:

  • The Moto G 5G appeals to users with a tight budget who also need a macro camera.
  • The Motorola might be a good option for users who want basic smartphone features without any heavy gaming or video editing.

Sony Xperia 1 VI Advantages:

  • Superior Display: The OLED screen with a 120Hz refresh rate provides a vastly superior viewing experience with vibrant colors and smooth motion.
  • Flagship Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 offers substantially faster processing power, better for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Advanced Camera System: The larger sensors, telephoto lens, and superior video recording capabilities provide greater versatility for photography and videography.
  • Newer Software: Android 14 provides the latest features, security updates, and a more refined user experience.
  • Faster Charging: 30W fast charging significantly reduces charging time.
  • Additional Features: Features like Bypass Charging, Reverse Charging and a better build quality with Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 improves user experience

Practical Implications:

  • The Sony Xperia 1 VI is a powerhouse for users who need high performance and advanced camera features.
  • Its higher-quality display makes it suitable for users who consume a lot of media or require a smooth experience.
  • The better camera system is great for those who prioritize photo and video quality.

Significant Trade-offs:

  • The Motorola sacrifices performance, display quality, and camera capabilities for a lower price.
  • The Sony might be more expensive, but it delivers cutting-edge technology and a premium experience.

3. User Profiles & Recommendations

Motorola Moto G 5G Ideal User:

  • Budget-Conscious Users: Individuals looking for a 5G-enabled phone at a lower price point.
  • Basic Smartphone Users: People who need a phone for calling, texting, web browsing, and occasional social media use.
  • Macro Photography Enthusiasts: Users who frequently take close-up photos and need a dedicated macro lens.

Use Cases:

  • Daily Communication: Making calls, sending texts, and using basic social media.
  • Casual Browsing: Surfing the web, checking emails, and using basic apps.
  • Macro Photography: Capturing detailed close-up shots of objects or small subjects.

Sony Xperia 1 VI Ideal User:

  • Power Users: Individuals who demand high performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding apps.
  • Photography and Videography Enthusiasts: Users who want a versatile camera system with excellent image and video quality.
  • Media Consumers: People who watch a lot of videos or play games and value a high-quality display.

Use Cases:

  • Mobile Gaming: Playing graphics-intensive games with smooth performance.
  • Content Creation: Recording high-quality videos and capturing detailed photos.
  • Media Consumption: Watching videos, movies, and playing games with a vibrant and smooth display.
  • Professional Use: Power users who require fast, reliable performance for business and productivity tasks.

Price-to-Value Ratio:

  • The Motorola offers better value for users looking for a simple and affordable 5G device with a macro lens.
  • The Sony provides superior value for those who require top-tier performance, advanced camera features, and a high-quality display, justifying its higher price.

4. Decision Framework

Key Questions for Buyers:

  1. What is your budget? Are you looking for the most affordable 5G option or are you willing to pay more for premium features?
  2. What do you prioritize most? Is it camera quality, processing speed, display quality, or battery life?
  3. What are your primary use cases? Do you mostly use your phone for basic tasks or do you plan on gaming, content creation, or other demanding activities?

Scenario-Based Recommendations:

  • Scenario 1: Tight Budget, Basic Usage - Recommendation: Motorola Moto G 5G. If your primary concern is cost and your usage is limited to basic tasks with some macro photography, the Motorola is a good fit.
  • Scenario 2: High-Performance Gaming, Professional Use - Recommendation: Sony Xperia 1 VI. If you need top-tier performance for gaming, content creation, or professional work, the Sony is the clear choice.
  • Scenario 3: Photo and Video Enthusiast - Recommendation: Sony Xperia 1 VI. If you prioritize camera capabilities and high-quality video, the advanced features of the Sony are essential.
  • Scenario 4: Media Consumption, Visual Experience - Recommendation: Sony Xperia 1 VI. The Sony's superior OLED display and 120Hz refresh rate provide an outstanding visual experience for videos and gaming.

My Choice

If I were choosing between these two phones, I would pick the Sony Xperia 1 VI.

Here's why:

  • Future-Proof Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset offers significantly higher performance, making it a more future-proof option. This ensures the phone will run smoothly and efficiently for years to come.
  • Superior Display: The OLED display with a 120Hz refresh rate is crucial for a pleasant viewing experience. The superior color accuracy and smooth scrolling make a noticeable difference in everyday use.
  • Advanced Camera System: While I appreciate the macro lens of the Motorola, the Sony's telephoto lens, larger sensors, and overall video capabilities provide greater versatility and image quality, making it better for creative expression.
  • Better Build Quality and Features: The Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 2 and features like bypass and reverse charging add to its premium feel and functionality.

Although the Sony is likely to be more expensive, the vast improvements in performance, display, camera capabilities, and user experience make it the far superior option. The Motorola Moto G 5G, while adequate for basic users on a tight budget, does not come close to the Sony in most aspects of modern smartphone usage.

Emily Harper
Emily Harper

Technology Insights Specialist

Dedicated technology writer specializing in mobile device analysis and technology communication. Expert at translating complex smartphone features into clear, actionable insights for diverse audiences.

Key Strengths:

  • Mobile technology analysis
  • Digital media communication
  • Technical storytelling
  • User-centric technology insights

Bridging technical complexity with engaging, accessible narratives.