Smartphone Comparison: Motorola Moto G 5G vs. Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra
1. Specifications Comparison
| Feature | Motorola Moto G 5G | Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra | Practical Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Design | |||
| Dimensions | 166.1 × 76.1 × 9.9 mm | 162.3 × 79 × 8.6 mm | Moto G 5G is taller and thicker, S24 Ultra is wider. S24 Ultra feels more premium while the Moto G is bulkier. |
| Weight | 212g | 232g | Moto G 5G is lighter and more comfortable for prolonged use, S24 Ultra is heavier. |
| Display | |||
| Size | 6.7" | 6.8" | Negligible difference in size. Both are large for immersive media consumption. |
| Resolution | 1080x2400 | 1440x3120 | S24 Ultra has a significantly sharper display with more detail due to higher resolution. |
| Pixel Density (PPI) | 393 | 505 | S24 Ultra's higher PPI means noticeably sharper text and images. |
| Technology | IPS LCD | Unknown | Unknown display technology of S24 Ultra. Moto G 5G has a standard LCD. |
| Refresh Rate | 60Hz | 120Hz | S24 Ultra provides smoother scrolling and animations, resulting in a more fluid user experience. |
| Brightness | 0 nits | 2600 nits | S24 Ultra is vastly superior for outdoor visibility in direct sunlight. The Moto G 5G may be difficult to view under bright conditions. |
| Performance | |||
| Chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G (8 nm) | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) | S24 Ultra has a vastly superior processor, leading to faster app launches, smoother multitasking, and better gaming performance. |
| AnTuTu Score | 390,000 | 1,814,869 | S24 Ultra is significantly more powerful, handling intensive tasks and demanding applications with ease. |
| GPU | Adreno 619 | Adreno 750 | S24 Ultra's GPU is much faster, leading to better graphics in games and demanding apps. |
| Battery | |||
| Capacity | 5000mAh | 5000mAh | Similar battery capacity, suggesting comparable battery life; However, the S24 Ultra's more efficient chipset may provide slightly better real-world endurance. |
| Charging | 20W fast charging | 45W fast charging | S24 Ultra charges much faster than the Moto G 5G, reducing waiting time. |
| Features | Non-removable | Bypass Charging, Reverse charging, Non-removable, 15W wireless charging, 4.5W reverse wireless charging | S24 Ultra offers more battery features (wireless charging, reverse charging, bypass charging). |
| Camera | |||
| Standard Camera | 48MP, f/1.7, 0.80µm | 200MP, f/1.7, 1/1.3", 1.00µm, Samsung ISOCELL HP2 | S24 Ultra captures much more detailed images due to higher resolution. Better in low light due to larger pixel size and superior sensor. |
| Telephoto+Portrait | None | 50MP, f/2.4, 1/1.56", 1.00µm, Sony IMX854 | S24 Ultra offers dedicated telephoto capabilities for better zoom and portrait shots. |
| Selfie Camera | 16MP, f/2.2, 1.00µm | 12MP, f/2.2 | The Moto G 5G has a higher resolution selfie camera. The practical difference in quality depends on the sensor capabilities. |
| Telephoto Lens | None | 10MP, f/3.4, 1/3.52", 1.12µm, Sony IMX754 | S24 Ultra offers dedicated telephoto capabilities for better zoom shots. |
| Wide Angle Lens | 8MP, f/2.2, 1.12µm | 12.2MP, f/2.2, 1/2.55", 1.40µm, Sony IMX564 | S24 Ultra captures wider, higher quality wide angle shots due to larger pixel size and better sensor. |
| Macro Lens | 2MP, f/2.4, 1.75µm | None | Moto G 5G has a dedicated macro lens for close-up shots, which is missing on the S24 Ultra. |
| Video Recording | 4K@30fps, 1080p@60fps w/EIS; Slow-mo 60fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@120fps w/HDR, EIS, stereo sound; Slow-mo 240fps | S24 Ultra offers much higher video quality with 8K recording, better stabilization, HDR, and slow-motion options. |
| DxOMark | Not Available | Mobile: 144 (Photo: 144, Video: 137) | S24 Ultra has a professional-grade camera confirmed by DxOMark scores; Moto G 5G camera has not been tested. |
| Features | Triple camera, LAF, Night Mode | Quadruple camera, OIS, 4K, 8K video, Night Mode 2.0 | S24 Ultra offers more advanced camera features (OIS, 4K/8K recording, better night mode); Moto G 5G has a laser autofocus. |
2. Key Differences Analysis
Motorola Moto G 5G Advantages:
- Lighter Weight: The Moto G 5G is significantly lighter (20g), which is better for long usage sessions and one-handed operation.
- Macro Lens: Includes a dedicated macro lens for close-up photography, which may appeal to certain users.
- Lower Price: As an older phone, it will be priced significantly lower.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Advantages:
- Superior Display: Higher resolution, pixel density, refresh rate, and significantly higher brightness for a much better viewing experience.
- Far Superior Performance: The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset offers a massive performance leap for demanding tasks, gaming, and future-proofing.
- More Camera Features: Offers a far more versatile camera system including telephoto lenses, better sensors, 8k video recording, OIS, better low-light performance and much more.
- Faster Charging & Wireless Charging: 45W fast charging and wireless charging capabilities are significantly more convenient.
- More Storage: Comes with higher storage options.
- More Software & Connectivity Features: Newer Android version, more advanced Bluetooth and WiFi standards, as well as eSIM support.
Trade-offs:
- Moto G 5G: Sacrifices performance, display quality, camera versatility, and charging speed for a lower price and lighter design.
- Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra: Is much more expensive, heavier, and may not appeal to users seeking a simpler, lighter device with a focus on value.
3. User Profiles & Recommendations
Motorola Moto G 5G Ideal User:
- Budget-conscious users who prioritize basic smartphone functions.
- Users who value a lighter phone.
- Users who take close-up macro photos.
- Users who don't need the latest tech or performance and are more price-sensitive.
Use Cases for Moto G 5G:
- Everyday communication and social media browsing.
- Basic photography for casual sharing.
- Web browsing and basic app usage.
- As a secondary phone.
Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra Ideal User:
- Power users who demand top performance and the best features.
- Photography enthusiasts and content creators.
- Users who want the best screen quality and smooth user experience.
- Users who need the most advanced connectivity features.
- Users who are not price-sensitive and value the best available tech.
Use Cases for S24 Ultra:
- Gaming and heavy multitasking.
- High-quality photo and video recording.
- Professional content creation.
- Demanding productivity tasks.
- Outdoor use where screen visibility is critical.
4. Decision Framework
Key Questions for Buyers:
- What is your budget? The price difference is substantial, and is a primary differentiator for these devices.
- What is your priority: performance/camera or price/lightness? The S24 Ultra excels in performance and camera capabilities while the Moto G 5G offers a more affordable price and lighter build.
- What do you mostly use your smartphone for? Heavy users will benefit greatly from the performance and features of the S24 Ultra, while light users may not see much difference.
Scenario-Based Recommendations:
- Scenario 1: Budget is a major concern, basic phone needed: The Motorola Moto G 5G is recommended as a more affordable device that covers the basics.
- Scenario 2: Best performance, camera, and display is necessary: The Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra is the clear winner for users who want top-tier performance and features.
- Scenario 3: Need a light device: The Motorola Moto G 5G is the better option for a user who values a light smartphone.
My Choice
Given my profile as a tech enthusiast and a person who values performance, camera quality, and display technology, I would choose the Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra. While the Moto G 5G is a capable device at its price point, the S24 Ultra's superior performance, display, and camera capabilities offer a significantly better experience for the kind of tasks I perform on my smartphone, which include gaming, photography, and video editing. The price difference is significant, but for me the improved user experience makes the S24 Ultra the better choice.
